Meeks Derek W, Smith Michael W, Taylor Lesley, Sittig Dean F, Scott Jean M, Singh Hardeep
Houston VA Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA Department of Family and Community Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Houston VA Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):1053-9. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002578. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
A recent Institute of Medicine report called for attention to safety issues related to electronic health records (EHRs). We analyzed EHR-related safety concerns reported within a large, integrated healthcare system.
The Informatics Patient Safety Office of the Veterans Health Administration (VA) maintains a non-punitive, voluntary reporting system to collect and investigate EHR-related safety concerns (ie, adverse events, potential events, and near misses). We analyzed completed investigations using an eight-dimension sociotechnical conceptual model that accounted for both technical and non-technical dimensions of safety. Using the framework analysis approach to qualitative data, we identified emergent and recurring safety concerns common to multiple reports.
We extracted 100 consecutive, unique, closed investigations between August 2009 and May 2013 from 344 reported incidents. Seventy-four involved unsafe technology and 25 involved unsafe use of technology. A majority (70%) involved two or more model dimensions. Most often, non-technical dimensions such as workflow, policies, and personnel interacted in a complex fashion with technical dimensions such as software/hardware, content, and user interface to produce safety concerns. Most (94%) safety concerns related to either unmet data-display needs in the EHR (ie, displayed information available to the end user failed to reduce uncertainty or led to increased potential for patient harm), software upgrades or modifications, data transmission between components of the EHR, or 'hidden dependencies' within the EHR.
EHR-related safety concerns involving both unsafe technology and unsafe use of technology persist long after 'go-live' and despite the sophisticated EHR infrastructure represented in our data source. Currently, few healthcare institutions have reporting and analysis capabilities similar to the VA.
Because EHR-related safety concerns have complex sociotechnical origins, institutions with long-standing as well as recent EHR implementations should build a robust infrastructure to monitor and learn from them.
美国医学研究所近期的一份报告呼吁关注与电子健康记录(EHR)相关的安全问题。我们分析了在一个大型综合医疗系统中报告的与EHR相关的安全问题。
退伍军人健康管理局(VA)的信息学患者安全办公室维护一个非惩罚性的自愿报告系统,以收集和调查与EHR相关的安全问题(即不良事件、潜在事件和未遂失误)。我们使用一个八维度社会技术概念模型分析已完成的调查,该模型考虑了安全的技术和非技术维度。通过对定性数据采用框架分析方法,我们确定了多份报告中共同出现的新出现的和反复出现的安全问题。
我们从344起报告事件中提取了2009年8月至2013年5月期间连续的100起独特的结案调查。74起涉及不安全技术,25起涉及技术的不安全使用。大多数(70%)涉及两个或更多模型维度。最常见的是,工作流程、政策和人员等非技术维度与软件/硬件、内容和用户界面等技术维度以复杂的方式相互作用,从而产生安全问题。大多数(94%)安全问题与EHR中未满足的数据显示需求(即最终用户可用的显示信息未能降低不确定性或导致患者伤害的可能性增加)、软件升级或修改、EHR组件之间的数据传输或EHR内的“隐藏依赖关系”有关。
尽管我们的数据源代表了复杂的EHR基础设施,但在“上线”很久之后,与EHR相关的涉及不安全技术和技术不安全使用的安全问题仍然存在。目前,很少有医疗机构具备与VA类似的报告和分析能力。
由于与EHR相关的安全问题具有复杂的社会技术根源,长期以及近期实施EHR的机构应建立强大的基础设施来对其进行监测并从中吸取经验教训。