• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《SAFER指南》:助力各机构提高电子健康记录的安全性与有效性。

The SAFER guides: empowering organizations to improve the safety and effectiveness of electronic health records.

作者信息

Sittig Dean F, Ash Joan S, Singh Hardeep

机构信息

UT-Memorial Hermann Center for Healthcare Quality and Safety, 6410 Fannin St, UTPB 1100.43, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail:

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2014 May;20(5):418-23.

PMID:25181570
Abstract

Electronic health records (EHRs) have potential to improve quality and safety of healthcare. However, EHR users have experienced safety concerns from EHR design and usability features that are not optimally adapted for the complex work flow of real-world practice. Few strategies exist to address unintended consequences from implementation of EHRs and other health information technologies. We propose that organizations equipped with EHRs should consider the strategy of "proactive risk assessment" of their EHR-enabled healthcare system to identify and address EHR-related safety concerns. In this paper, we describe the conceptual underpinning of an EHR-related self-assessment strategy to provide institutions a foundation upon which they could build their safety efforts. With support from the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC), we used a rigorous, iterative process to develop a set of 9 self-assessment tools to optimize the safety and safe use of EHRs. These tools, referred to as the Safety Assurance Factors for EHR Resilience (SAFER) guides, could be used to self-assess safety and effectiveness of EHR implementations, identify specific areas of vulnerability, and create solutions and culture change to mitigate risks. A variety of audiences could conduct these assessments, including frontline clinicians or care teams in different practices, or clinical, quality, or administrative leaders within larger institutions. The guides use a multifaceted systems-based approach to assess risk and empower organizations to work with internal or external stakeholders (eg, EHR developers) on optimizing EHR functionality and using EHRs to drive improvements in the quality and safety of healthcare.

摘要

电子健康记录(EHRs)有潜力提高医疗保健的质量和安全性。然而,EHR用户对EHR的设计和可用性特征存在安全担忧,这些特征并未针对现实世界实践的复杂工作流程进行优化。针对EHR和其他健康信息技术实施产生的意外后果,几乎没有应对策略。我们建议,配备EHR的组织应考虑对其基于EHR的医疗系统进行“主动风险评估”的策略,以识别和解决与EHR相关的安全问题。在本文中,我们描述了一种与EHR相关的自我评估策略的概念基础,为机构提供一个安全工作的基础。在美国国家卫生信息技术协调办公室(ONC)的支持下,我们采用了严格的迭代过程来开发一套9种自我评估工具,以优化EHR的安全性和安全使用。这些工具被称为EHR恢复力安全保证因素(SAFER)指南,可用于自我评估EHR实施的安全性和有效性,识别特定的脆弱领域,并创建解决方案和文化变革以降低风险。各种受众都可以进行这些评估,包括不同医疗机构的一线临床医生或护理团队,或大型机构内的临床、质量或行政领导。这些指南采用多方面的基于系统的方法来评估风险,并使组织能够与内部或外部利益相关者(如EHR开发者)合作,优化EHR功能,并利用EHR推动医疗保健质量和安全性的提高。

相似文献

1
The SAFER guides: empowering organizations to improve the safety and effectiveness of electronic health records.《SAFER指南》:助力各机构提高电子健康记录的安全性与有效性。
Am J Manag Care. 2014 May;20(5):418-23.
2
Safety Assurance Factors for Electronic Health Record Resilience (SAFER): study protocol.电子健康记录弹性的安全保障因素(SAFER)研究方案。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Apr 12;13:46. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-46.
3
Adherence to recommended electronic health record safety practices across eight health care organizations.在八个医疗机构中,对推荐的电子健康记录安全实践的遵守情况。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Jul 1;25(7):913-918. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy033.
4
Safe use of electronic health records and health information technology systems: trust but verify.安全使用电子健康记录和健康信息技术系统:信任但要验证。
J Patient Saf. 2013 Dec;9(4):177-89. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182a8c2b2.
5
Nursing Student Experiences Regarding Safe Use of Electronic Health Records: A Pilot Study of the Safety and Assurance Factors for EHR Resilience Guides.护理专业学生关于安全使用电子健康记录的经历:电子健康记录恢复力指南的安全性和保障因素的初步研究
Comput Inform Nurs. 2017 Jan;35(1):45-53. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000291.
6
A red-flag-based approach to risk management of EHR-related safety concerns.一种基于警示标志的电子健康记录相关安全问题风险管理方法。
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2013;33(2):21-6. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21123.
7
Evidence-based management of ambulatory electronic health record system implementation: an assessment of conceptual support and qualitative evidence.门诊电子健康记录系统实施的循证管理:概念支持与定性证据评估
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Jul;83(7):484-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
8
Electronic Health Record Challenges, Workarounds, and Solutions Observed in Practices Integrating Behavioral Health and Primary Care.在整合行为健康与初级保健的实践中观察到的电子健康记录挑战、变通方法及解决方案
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;28 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S63-72. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150133.
9
Electronic health records and patient safety: co-occurrence of early EHR implementation with patient safety practices in primary care settings.电子健康记录与患者安全:初级保健机构中早期电子健康记录实施与患者安全实践的同时出现。
Appl Clin Inform. 2015 Mar 11;6(1):136-47. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-11-RA-0099. eCollection 2015.
10
Strategies for Primary Care Stakeholders to Improve Electronic Health Records (EHRs).基层医疗利益相关者改善电子健康记录(EHRs)的策略。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Jan-Feb;29(1):126-34. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.01.150212.

引用本文的文献

1
Revisions to the Safety Assurance Factors for Electronic Health Record Resilience (SAFER) Guides to update national recommendations for safe use of electronic health records.《电子健康记录恢复力安全保障因素(SAFER)指南》修订版,以更新关于安全使用电子健康记录的国家建议。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Apr 1;32(4):755-760. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf018.
2
Vulnerability of a New Zealand hospital computerised provider order entry system to prescribing error: a comparative study with other systems.新西兰一家医院的计算机化医嘱录入系统对开处方错误的易感性:与其他系统的比较研究。
Intern Med J. 2025 Jun;55(6):975-984. doi: 10.1111/imj.70053. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
3
Perceptions of hospital electronic health record (EHR) training, support, and patient safety by staff position and tenure.
员工职位和任期对医院电子健康记录(EHR)培训、支持和患者安全的看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 20;24(1):955. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11322-3.
4
Evaluating Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Settings-Let Us Not Reinvent the Wheel.评估临床环境中的人工智能——让我们不要重新发明轮子。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 7;26:e46407. doi: 10.2196/46407.
5
Five Strategies for a Safer EHR Modernization Journey.实现更安全的电子健康记录现代化之旅的五大策略。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Oct;38(Suppl 4):940-942. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08331-z.
6
Electronic Health Record Transitions-How to Make Them Work.电子健康记录转换——如何使其发挥作用。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Oct;38(Suppl 4):946-948. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08329-7.
7
System Configuration Evaluation for a Province-Wide Clinical Information System Using the eSafety Checklist.利用 eSafety 清单对全省临床信息系统进行系统配置评估。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Aug;14(4):735-742. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771392. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
8
Development and Validation of SafeHIT: An Instrument to Assess the Self-Reported Safe Use of Health Information Technology.开发与验证 SafeHIT:一种评估健康信息技术自我报告安全使用情况的工具。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Aug;14(4):693-704. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771394. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
9
Precision Medicine in Solid Tumors: How Far We Traveled So Far?实体瘤中的精准医学:我们迄今走了多远?
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jun 30;14(13):3202. doi: 10.3390/cancers14133202.
10
Driving digital health transformation in hospitals: a formative qualitative evaluation of the English Global Digital Exemplar programme.推动医院数字化健康转型:英国全球数字典范项目的形成性定性评估。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021 Dec;28(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100429.