Ishida Kelly, Castro Rafaela Alves, Torrado Juan J, Serrano Dolores Remedios, Borba-Santos Luana Pereira, Quintella Leonardo Pereira, de Souza Wanderley, Rozental Sonia, Lopes-Bezerra Leila M
Laboratory of Antifungal Chemotherapy, Department of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Laboratory of Cellular Mycology and Proteomics, Department of Cell Biology, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Med Mycol. 2018 Apr 1;56(3):288-296. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myx040.
In severe cases of sporotrichosis, it is recommended to use amphotericin B deoxycholate (D-AMB) or its lipid formulations and/or in association with itraconazole (ITC). Our aim was to evaluate the antifungal efficacy of a poly-aggregated amphotericin B (P-AMB), a nonlipid formulation, compared with D-AMB on systemic sporotrichosis caused by Sporothrix brasiliensis. In vitro assays showed that Sporothrix schenckii sensu stricto and S. brasiliensis yeast clinical isolates were susceptible to low concentrations of P-AMB and D-AMB. Although P-AMB presented a higher minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) compared to D-AMB, its cytotoxic effect on renal cells and erythrocytes was lower. For the in vivo assays, male BALB/c mice were intravenously infected with S. brasiliensis yeasts, and P-AMB or D-AMB was administered 3 days post-infection. The efficacy of five therapeutic regimens was tested: intravenous monotherapy with P-AMB or D-AMB, intravenous pulsed-therapy with P-AMB or D-AMB, and intravenous therapy with P-AMB, followed by oral ITC. These treatments increased murine survival and controlled the fungal burden in the liver, spleen, lungs, and kidneys. However, only D-AMB monotherapy or the pulsed-therapies with D-AMB or P-AMB led to 100% survival of the mice 45 days post-infection; only pulsed administration of D-AMB was able to control the fungal load in all organs 45 days post-infection. Accordingly, the histopathological findings showed reductions in the fungal burden and inflammatory reactions in these treatment regimens. Together, our results suggest that the P-AMB formulation could be considered as an alternative drug to D-AMB for treating disseminated sporotrichosis.
在孢子丝菌病的严重病例中,建议使用两性霉素B去氧胆酸盐(D-AMB)或其脂质制剂和/或与伊曲康唑(ITC)联合使用。我们的目的是评估一种非脂质制剂多聚体两性霉素B(P-AMB)与D-AMB相比,对巴西孢子丝菌引起的系统性孢子丝菌病的抗真菌疗效。体外试验表明,申克孢子丝菌狭义种和巴西孢子丝菌酵母临床分离株对低浓度的P-AMB和D-AMB敏感。尽管与D-AMB相比,P-AMB的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)更高,但其对肾细胞和红细胞的细胞毒性作用更低。在体内试验中,雄性BALB/c小鼠静脉注射巴西孢子丝菌酵母,感染后3天给予P-AMB或D-AMB。测试了五种治疗方案的疗效:P-AMB或D-AMB静脉单一疗法、P-AMB或D-AMB静脉脉冲疗法,以及P-AMB静脉疗法后口服ITC。这些治疗提高了小鼠的存活率,并控制了肝脏、脾脏、肺和肾脏中的真菌负荷。然而,只有D-AMB单一疗法或D-AMB或P-AMB的脉冲疗法在感染后45天导致小鼠100%存活;只有D-AMB的脉冲给药能够在感染后45天控制所有器官中的真菌载量。因此,组织病理学结果显示这些治疗方案中的真菌负荷和炎症反应有所减少。总之,我们的结果表明,P-AMB制剂可被视为治疗播散性孢子丝菌病的D-AMB替代药物。