• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定量系统性硬化症的数字溃疡:计算机辅助平面测量法测量病变面积的可靠性。

Quantifying Digital Ulcers in Systemic Sclerosis: Reliability of Computer-Assisted Planimetry in Measuring Lesion Size.

机构信息

University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

University of Manchester and Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Mar;70(3):486-490. doi: 10.1002/acr.23300.

DOI:10.1002/acr.23300
PMID:28575546
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Digital ulcers are a major problem in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), causing severe pain and impairment of hand function. In addition, digital ulcers heal slowly and sometimes become infected, which can lead to gangrene and necessitate amputation if appropriate intervention is not taken. A reliable, objective method for assessing digital ulcer healing or progression is needed in both the clinical and research arenas. This study was undertaken to compare 2 computer-assisted planimetry methods of measurement of digital ulcer area on photographs (ellipse and freehand regions of interest [ROIs]), and to assess the reliability of photographic calibration and the 2 methods of area measurement.

METHODS

Photographs were taken of 107 digital ulcers in 36 patients with SSc spectrum disease. Three raters assessed the photographs. Custom software allowed raters to calibrate photograph dimensions and draw ellipse or freehand ROIs. The shapes and dimensions of the ROIs were saved for further analysis.

RESULTS

Calibration (by a single rater performing 5 repeats per image) produced an intraclass correlation coefficient (intrarater reliability) of 0.99. The mean ± SD areas of digital ulcers assessed using ellipse and freehand ROIs were 18.7 ± 20.2 mm and 17.6 ± 19.3 mm , respectively. Intrarater and interrater reliability of the ellipse ROI were 0.97 and 0.77, respectively. For the freehand ROI, the intrarater and interrater reliability were 0.98 and 0.76, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that computer-assisted planimetry methods applied to SSc-related digital ulcers can be extremely reliable. Further work is needed to move toward applying these methods as outcome measures for clinical trials and in clinical settings.

摘要

目的

手指溃疡是系统性硬化症(SSc)患者的一个主要问题,会导致严重的疼痛和手部功能障碍。此外,手指溃疡愈合缓慢,有时会感染,若不采取适当的干预措施,可能导致坏疽和需要截肢。在临床和研究领域都需要一种可靠的、客观的方法来评估手指溃疡的愈合或进展。本研究旨在比较两种计算机辅助的手指溃疡面积测量方法(椭圆和徒手感兴趣区域[ROI]),并评估照片校准和两种面积测量方法的可靠性。

方法

对 36 例 SSc 谱系疾病患者的 107 个手指溃疡进行了拍照。3 名评估者对照片进行了评估。定制软件允许评估者校准照片尺寸并绘制椭圆或徒手 ROI。ROI 的形状和尺寸被保存下来进行进一步分析。

结果

通过一名评估者对每张图像重复 5 次进行校准(单盲),产生了 0.99 的组内相关系数(组内可靠性)。使用椭圆和徒手 ROI 评估的手指溃疡平均面积分别为 18.7±20.2mm 和 17.6±19.3mm。椭圆 ROI 的组内和组间可靠性分别为 0.97 和 0.77。对于徒手 ROI,组内和组间可靠性分别为 0.98 和 0.76。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,应用于 SSc 相关手指溃疡的计算机辅助面积测量方法非常可靠。需要进一步的工作来推动将这些方法作为临床试验和临床实践中的结果测量方法。

相似文献

1
Quantifying Digital Ulcers in Systemic Sclerosis: Reliability of Computer-Assisted Planimetry in Measuring Lesion Size.定量系统性硬化症的数字溃疡:计算机辅助平面测量法测量病变面积的可靠性。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Mar;70(3):486-490. doi: 10.1002/acr.23300.
2
Consensus opinion of a North American Working Group regarding the classification of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis.北美工作组关于系统性硬化症中指端溃疡分类的共识意见。
Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Feb;33(2):207-14. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2460-7. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
3
Tracking digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: a feasibility study assessing lesion area in patient-recorded smartphone photographs.系统性硬化症中数字溃疡的追踪:一项评估患者记录的智能手机照片中病变面积的可行性研究。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Sep;77(9):1382-1384. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212829. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
4
Simulated Wound Assessment Using Digital Planimetry versus Three-Dimensional Cameras: Implications for Clinical Assessment.使用数字平面测量法与三维相机进行模拟伤口评估:对临床评估的影响
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 May;41:235-240. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.10.029. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
5
Reliability and Photographic Equivalency of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale, an Outcome Measure for Postoperative Scars.瘢痕美观评估和分级(SCAR)量表作为术后瘢痕的一种结局测量工具,其可靠性和照片等效性。
JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Jan 1;153(1):55-60. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.3757.
6
Is there a role for laser speckle contrast analysis (LASCA) in predicting the outcome of digital ulcers in patients with systemic sclerosis?激光散斑对比分析(LASCA)在预测系统性硬化症患者手指溃疡预后中的作用如何?
Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Jan;39(1):69-75. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04662-7. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
7
Pilot study assessing pathophysiology and healing of digital ulcers in patients with systemic sclerosis using laser Doppler imaging and thermography.一项试点研究,运用激光多普勒成像和热成像技术评估系统性硬化症患者手指溃疡的病理生理学及愈合情况。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 Sep-Oct;34 Suppl 100(5):100-105. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
8
[Correlation of a quantitative videocapillaroscopic score with the development of digital skin ulcers in scleroderma patients].[定量视频毛细血管镜评分与硬皮病患者指端皮肤溃疡发生的相关性]
Reumatismo. 2008 Jul-Sep;60(3):199-205. doi: 10.4081/reumatismo.2008.199.
9
Reliability and validity of the revised photographic wound assessment tool on digital images taken of various types of chronic wounds.修订后的数码图像拍摄各种慢性伤口的摄影伤口评估工具的可靠性和有效性。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2013 Aug;26(8):360-73. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000431329.50869.6f.
10
Wound areas by computerized planimetry of digital images: accuracy and reliability.通过数字图像的计算机化平面测量法测量创面面积:准确性和可靠性。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009 May;22(5):222-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000350839.19477.ce.

引用本文的文献

1
Recent advances in non-invasive imaging of systemic sclerosis-related digital ulcers.系统性硬化症相关指端溃疡无创成像的最新进展。
J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2025 May 20:23971983251339703. doi: 10.1177/23971983251339703.
2
Clinicians' perspectives concerning treatment initiation and escalation strategies for digital ulcers in patients with systemic sclerosis.临床医生对系统性硬化症患者指端溃疡治疗起始及强化策略的看法。
J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2025 Apr 30:23971983251336616. doi: 10.1177/23971983251336616.
3
Artificial Intelligence Methods for Diagnostic and Decision-Making Assistance in Chronic Wounds: A Systematic Review.
慢性伤口诊断与决策辅助的人工智能方法:一项系统综述
J Med Syst. 2025 Feb 19;49(1):29. doi: 10.1007/s10916-025-02153-8.
4
Development of a measuring app for systemic sclerosis-related digital ulceration (SALVE: Scleroderma App for Lesion VErification).一种用于系统性硬化症相关指端溃疡的测量应用程序的开发(SALVE:硬皮病病变验证应用程序)
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 Dec 1;63(12):3297-3305. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae371.
5
Reliability of digital ulcer definitions as proposed by the UK Scleroderma Study Group: A challenge for clinical trial design.英国硬皮病研究小组提出的指端溃疡定义的可靠性:对临床试验设计的一项挑战。
J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2018 Jun 1;3(2):170-174. doi: 10.1177/2397198318764796. Epub 2018 Mar 27.