• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过数字图像的计算机化平面测量法测量创面面积:准确性和可靠性。

Wound areas by computerized planimetry of digital images: accuracy and reliability.

机构信息

College of Medical Sciences, Department of Nursing, Nova Southeastern University, Ft Lauderdale, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009 May;22(5):222-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000350839.19477.ce.

DOI:10.1097/01.ASW.0000350839.19477.ce
PMID:19521289
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tracking wound size is an essential part of treatment. Because a wound's initial size may affect apparent healing rates, its surface area (S) and its surface area-to-perimeter (S/P) ratio are useful to document healing. Assessments of these parameters can be made by computerized planimetry of digital images using suitable software.

OBJECTIVE

Because different caregivers often evaluate wounds and because measurement time is important, the objective of this study was to determine accuracy, repeatability, and measurement time of S and S/P from measurements of images recorded by digital photography.

METHODS

Six wound images of various complexities with known areas were measured in triplicate by 20 senior nursing students during 2 sessions 1 week apart. Images included an ellipse, 2 traced venous ulcers, and photographs of a pressure, diabetic plantar, and venous ulcer. Area error was determined as the percentage difference between known and planimetry measured areas. Reliability was assessed from test-retest coefficient of variations (CV%) from which the smallest meaningful percentage change (SMPC) was determined.

RESULTS

Area errors (mean +/- SD) ranged from -2.95% +/- 7.01% to +2.32% +/- 6.04%. For well-defined image margins, area and S/P SMPC values were all less than 3.2%. For borders that were not as well defined, SMPCs were larger, ranging between 6.2% and 10.8%. Wound measurement time decreased from 93.4 +/- 35.1 seconds at session 1 to 67.7 +/- 24.4 at session 2 (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

: Results based on the specific software used and on the outcomes of the study group indicate that simple computer-based planimetry of digital images can provide rapid, accurate, and reliable estimates of wound area and S/P ratios.

摘要

背景

跟踪伤口大小是治疗的重要组成部分。由于伤口的初始大小可能会影响明显的愈合速度,因此其表面积 (S) 和表面积与周长比 (S/P) 很有用,可用于记录愈合情况。这些参数的评估可以通过使用合适软件对数字图像进行计算机化的平面测量来完成。

目的

由于不同的护理人员经常评估伤口,并且测量时间很重要,因此本研究的目的是确定通过数字摄影记录的图像测量时 S 和 S/P 的准确性、可重复性和测量时间。

方法

在两次间隔一周的会议上,由 20 名高级护理学生对具有已知面积的 6 个复杂程度不同的伤口图像进行了三次测量。图像包括一个椭圆、2 个追踪的静脉溃疡以及压力、糖尿病足底和静脉溃疡的照片。面积误差是通过比较已知面积和平面测量面积之间的百分比差异来确定的。可靠性是通过测试-再测试变异系数 (CV%) 来评估的,从中确定了最小有意义的百分比变化 (SMPC)。

结果

面积误差(平均值 +/- SD)范围为 -2.95% +/- 7.01% 至 +2.32% +/- 6.04%。对于定义明确的图像边缘,面积和 S/P SMPC 值均小于 3.2%。对于定义不明确的边界,SMPC 值较大,范围在 6.2%至 10.8%之间。测量时间从第一次会议的 93.4 +/- 35.1 秒减少到第二次会议的 67.7 +/- 24.4 秒(P <.001)。

结论

基于使用的特定软件和研究组的结果,简单的数字图像计算机化平面测量可以提供快速、准确、可靠的伤口面积和 S/P 比估计值。

相似文献

1
Wound areas by computerized planimetry of digital images: accuracy and reliability.通过数字图像的计算机化平面测量法测量创面面积:准确性和可靠性。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009 May;22(5):222-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000350839.19477.ce.
2
Wound debridement: Comparative reliability of three methods for measuring fibrin percentage in chronic wounds.伤口清创:三种方法测量慢性伤口中纤维蛋白百分比的比较可靠性。
Wound Repair Regen. 2010 Jan-Feb;18(1):13-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00555.x.
3
A study of the efficiency and convenience of an advanced portable Wound Measurement System (VISITRAK).一项关于先进便携式伤口测量系统(VISITRAK)的效率与便利性的研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jul;16(7):1265-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01790.x.
4
Wound measurement comparing the use of acetate tracings and Visitrak digital planimetry.使用醋酸盐描记法和Visitrak数字平面测量法进行伤口测量比较。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Apr;15(4):422-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01364.x.
5
Reliability and validity of the revised photographic wound assessment tool on digital images taken of various types of chronic wounds.修订后的数码图像拍摄各种慢性伤口的摄影伤口评估工具的可靠性和有效性。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2013 Aug;26(8):360-73. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000431329.50869.6f.
6
Measurement of venous leg ulcers with a laser-based three-dimensional method: comparison to computer planimetry with photography.基于激光的三维方法测量下肢静脉性溃疡:与计算机摄影平面测量法的比较
Wound Repair Regen. 2007 Sep-Oct;15(5):767-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00300.x.
7
[A comparison of digital planimetry and transparency tracing based methods for measuring diabetic cutaneous ulcer surface area].[基于数字平面测量法和透明描记法测量糖尿病皮肤溃疡表面积的比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008 May;22(5):563-6.
8
Three-dimensional documentation of wound healing: first results of a new objective method for measurement.伤口愈合的三维记录:一种新的客观测量方法的初步结果
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2006 Oct;4(10):848-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2006.06113.x.
9
Photographic assessment of the appearance of chronic pressure and leg ulcers.慢性压力性腿部溃疡外观的摄影评估。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2000 Apr;46(4):20-6, 28-30.
10
An assessment of the accuracy and usability of a novel optical wound measurement system.一种新型光学伤口测量系统的准确性和可用性评估。
Diabet Med. 2009 Jan;26(1):93-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02611.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Fabrication of Mupirocin-Loaded PEGylated Chitosan Nanoparticulate Films for Enhanced Wound Healing.载莫匹罗星的聚乙二醇化壳聚糖纳米粒膜的制备及其增强创伤愈合的研究
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Aug 24;25(17):9188. doi: 10.3390/ijms25179188.
2
Comparison of Digital Planimetry and Ruler Methods for the Measurement of Extraction Socket Wounds.数字测径法与标尺法测量拔牙窝的比较。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 10;59(1):135. doi: 10.3390/medicina59010135.
3
Software-Based Method for Automated Segmentation and Measurement of Wounds on Photographs Using Mask R-CNN: a Validation Study.
基于软件的方法,使用 Mask R-CNN 对照片上的伤口进行自动分割和测量:一项验证研究。
J Digit Imaging. 2021 Aug;34(4):788-797. doi: 10.1007/s10278-021-00490-x. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
4
Pilot study to evaluate a novel three-dimensional wound measurement device.评估一种新型三维伤口测量装置的初步研究。
Int Wound J. 2016 Dec;13(6):1372-1377. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12534. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
5
Methods to assess area and volume of wounds - a systematic review.评估伤口面积和体积的方法——一项系统综述
Int Wound J. 2016 Aug;13(4):540-53. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12472. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
6
Validation of a laser-assisted wound measurement device in a wound healing model.激光辅助伤口测量装置在伤口愈合模型中的验证
Int Wound J. 2016 Oct;13(5):614-8. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12328. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
7
Validation of a laser-assisted wound measurement device for measuring wound volume.用于测量伤口容积的激光辅助伤口测量装置的验证
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 Sep 1;7(5):1161-6. doi: 10.1177/193229681300700508.
8
A novel and accurate technique of photographic wound measurement.一种新颖且准确的伤口摄影测量技术。
Indian J Plast Surg. 2012 May;45(2):425-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-0358.101333.