Suppr超能文献

新诊断为癫痫合并精神共病患者的治疗模式。

Treatment patterns in patients with a new diagnosis of epilepsy and psychiatric comorbidities.

机构信息

UCB Pharma, 8010 Arco Corporate Drive, Raleigh, NC 27617, USA.

UCB Pharma, 2 Kinross Ave, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 9EP, London, UK.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2019 Oct;99:106405. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Sep 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to describe antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment patterns in patients with epilepsy, with and without psychiatric comorbidities.

METHODS

This was a retrospective claims-based cohort study using Truven Health MarketScan databases (Commercial and supplemental Medicare, calendar years 2012-2017; Medicaid, 2012-2016). Persons met epilepsy diagnostic criteria, had an index date (first epilepsy diagnosis) with a preceding 2-year baseline (<1 year for persons of 1 to <2 years of age; none for persons <1 year), and continuous medical and pharmacy enrolment without epilepsy/seizure diagnosis or AED prescription during baseline. Based on presence/absence of psychiatric diagnosis codes in the baseline period, persons were classified into two cohorts: with or without psychiatric comorbidities. Outcomes included percentage of treated persons (AED prescription), type, duration, and outcome of first-line AED treatment.

RESULTS

There were 18,062 persons in each cohort with and without psychiatric comorbidities, matched by age, sex, and insurance type, who met selection (or inclusion) criteria. More patients with psychiatric comorbidities were prescribed an AED after diagnosis (57.6% vs. 52.8%), and had at least two AEDs prescribed during follow-up (16.7% vs. 11.4%) than patients without psychiatric comorbidities. Most patients with and without psychiatric comorbidities prescribed AED monotherapy as first-line treatment (73.0% vs. 78.7%). Levetiracetam was the most common AED prescribed less frequently in patients with than without psychiatric comorbidities (40.8% vs. 56.7%). More patients with psychiatric comorbidities changed first-line AED treatment than patients without psychiatric comorbidities.

CONCLUSION

The presence of psychiatric comorbidities may impact treatment decisions in newly diagnosed persons with epilepsy to optimize patient outcomes.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述伴有和不伴有精神共病的癫痫患者的抗癫痫药物(AED)治疗模式。

方法

这是一项回顾性基于索赔的队列研究,使用 Truven Health MarketScan 数据库(商业和补充医疗保险,2012-2017 年;医疗补助,2012-2016 年)。患者符合癫痫诊断标准,有索引日期(首次癫痫诊断),并在前 2 年的基线期(年龄在 1 至<2 岁的患者为<1 年;年龄<1 岁的患者没有),且在基线期内持续接受医疗和药房登记,没有癫痫/发作诊断或 AED 处方。根据基线期内是否存在精神科诊断代码,将患者分为两个队列:伴有或不伴有精神共病。结果包括接受治疗的患者比例(AED 处方)、一线 AED 治疗的类型、持续时间和结局。

结果

每个伴有和不伴有精神共病的队列中都有 18062 名患者,他们在年龄、性别和保险类型方面匹配,符合选择(或纳入)标准。与不伴有精神共病的患者相比,伴有精神共病的患者在诊断后更常开具 AED 处方(57.6%比 52.8%),且在随访期间至少开具两种 AED 处方(16.7%比 11.4%)。大多数伴有和不伴有精神共病的患者首选 AED 单药治疗(73.0%比 78.7%)。与不伴有精神共病的患者相比,伴有精神共病的患者较少使用左乙拉西坦作为一线治疗药物(40.8%比 56.7%)。伴有精神共病的患者比不伴有精神共病的患者更频繁地改变一线 AED 治疗。

结论

伴有精神共病可能会影响新诊断为癫痫患者的治疗决策,以优化患者结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验