Medani Samar A, Hensey Mark, Caples Norma, Owens Patrick
Cardiology Department, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland.
Cardiology Department, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland.
J Electrocardiol. 2018 Jan-Feb;51(1):50-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2017.04.018. Epub 2017 May 16.
Inaccurate electrocardiography (ECG) lead placement may lead to erroneous diagnoses, such as poor R wave progression. We sought to assess the accuracy of precordial ECG lead placement amongst hospital staff members, and to re-evaluate performance after an educational intervention.
100 randomly selected eligible staff members placed sticker dots on a mannequin, their positions were recorded on a radar plot and compared to the correct precordial lead positions. The commonest errors were placing V1 and V2 leads too superiorly, and V5 and V6 leads too medially.Following an educational intervention with the aid of moderated poster presentations and volunteer patients, the study was repeated six months later. 60 subjects correctly placed all leads, compared to 10 in the pre-intervention cohort (P<0.0001) with the proportion achieving correct placement of any lead rising from 0.34 to 0.83, (p<0.0001 for all leads).
Incorrect ECG lead placement is common. This may be addressed through regular training incorporated into annual induction processes for relevant health care professionals.
心电图(ECG)导联放置不准确可能导致错误诊断,如R波递增不良。我们旨在评估医院工作人员胸前区ECG导联放置的准确性,并在进行教育干预后重新评估其表现。
随机选取100名符合条件的工作人员在人体模型上放置贴纸点,其位置记录在雷达图上,并与正确的胸前导联位置进行比较。最常见的错误是V1和V2导联放置得过高,V5和V6导联放置得过于靠内。在借助适度的海报展示和志愿者患者进行教育干预后,六个月后重复该研究。60名受试者正确放置了所有导联,而干预前队列中只有10名(P<0.0001),任何导联放置正确的比例从0.34升至0.83(所有导联P<0.0001)。
ECG导联放置错误很常见。这可以通过将定期培训纳入相关医护人员的年度入职流程来解决。