Suppr超能文献

用拉普拉斯模拟确定骨骼肌结构:与扩散张量成像的比较。

Determining skeletal muscle architecture with Laplacian simulations: a comparison with diffusion tensor imaging.

机构信息

Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Uniservices Building, Level 6 70 Symonds St., Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.

Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2017 Dec;16(6):1845-1855. doi: 10.1007/s10237-017-0923-5. Epub 2017 Jun 2.

Abstract

Determination of skeletal muscle architecture is important for accurately modeling muscle behavior. Current methods for 3D muscle architecture determination can be costly and time-consuming, making them prohibitive for clinical or modeling applications. Computational approaches such as Laplacian flow simulations can estimate muscle fascicle orientation based on muscle shape and aponeurosis location. The accuracy of this approach is unknown, however, since it has not been validated against other standards for muscle architecture determination. In this study, muscle architectures from the Laplacian approach were compared to those determined from diffusion tensor imaging in eight adult medial gastrocnemius muscles. The datasets were subdivided into training and validation sets, and computational fluid dynamics software was used to conduct Laplacian simulations. In training sets, inputs of muscle geometry, aponeurosis location, and geometric flow guides resulted in good agreement between methods. Application of the method to validation sets showed no significant differences in pennation angle (mean difference [Formula: see text] or fascicle length (mean difference 0.9 mm). Laplacian simulation was thus effective at predicting gastrocnemius muscle architectures in healthy volunteers using imaging-derived muscle shape and aponeurosis locations. This method may serve as a tool for determining muscle architecture in silico and as a complement to other approaches.

摘要

确定骨骼肌结构对于准确模拟肌肉行为非常重要。目前用于确定 3D 肌肉结构的方法可能成本高昂且耗时,因此不适合临床或建模应用。基于肌肉形状和腱膜位置的拉普拉斯流模拟等计算方法可以估计肌束的方向。然而,由于尚未针对其他肌肉结构确定标准进行验证,因此该方法的准确性尚不清楚。在这项研究中,将拉普拉斯方法确定的肌肉结构与从扩散张量成像确定的肌肉结构进行了比较,共涉及 8 个成年内侧比目鱼肌。数据集分为训练集和验证集,并用计算流体动力学软件进行了拉普拉斯模拟。在训练集中,肌肉几何形状、腱膜位置和几何流引导的输入导致两种方法之间具有良好的一致性。将该方法应用于验证集,发现旋角(平均差异 [公式:见正文])或肌束长度(平均差异 0.9 毫米)没有显著差异。因此,拉普拉斯模拟可以有效地使用成像衍生的肌肉形状和腱膜位置来预测健康志愿者的比目鱼肌结构。该方法可以作为一种在计算机中确定肌肉结构的工具,并作为其他方法的补充。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验