School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Mar;34(1):85-99. doi: 10.1007/s10899-017-9697-z.
The DSM-5 includes provisions for episodic forms of gambling disorder, with such changes aligned with earlier accounts of potential binge gambling behaviours. However, there is little research that indicates the utility of these classifications of episodic or binge gambling, and this study considered their characteristics in a clinical sample. It involved administration of a new binge gambling screening tool, along with routine measures, to n = 214 patients entering a specialist treatment clinic for gambling problems. Results indicated that episodic gambling was common in this clinical context, with 28 and 32% of patients reporting gambling episodes that were (a) regular and alternating, and (b) irregular and intermittent, respectively. These patterns were distinguished by factors including associations with covariates that indicated differences from continuous gamblers. For example, the irregular episodic gamblers, but not the regular pattern, demonstrated lower levels of problem gambling severity and comorbidity. Rates of potential binge gambling, which was defined in terms of additional criteria, were around 4% and numbers were insufficient for comparable analyses. The findings support inclusion of episodic forms of gambling disorder in the DSM-5, but highlight the need for improved recognition and research on heterogeneous forms of episodic gambling.
DSM-5 包括发作性赌博障碍的规定,这些变化与早期潜在的狂欢赌博行为的描述相一致。然而,很少有研究表明这些发作性或狂欢性赌博的分类具有实用性,本研究在一个临床样本中考虑了这些分类的特征。它涉及到对 n=214 名进入专门赌博问题治疗诊所的患者使用新的狂欢赌博筛查工具以及常规措施。结果表明,在这种临床环境中,发作性赌博很常见,分别有 28%和 32%的患者报告了(a)有规律且交替的和(b)不规则且间歇性的赌博发作。这些模式的区别在于与协变量的关联,表明与连续赌博者存在差异。例如,不规则发作性赌博者,而不是有规律的模式,表现出较低的赌博严重程度和共病程度。根据额外标准定义的潜在狂欢性赌博的发生率约为 4%,且数量不足以进行可比分析。这些发现支持将发作性赌博障碍纳入 DSM-5,但强调需要更好地识别和研究发作性赌博的异质形式。