• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在问题赌博严重程度指数上区分高危受访者的持续性与间歇性集群。

Distinguishing Persistent Versus Episodic Clusters of At-Risk Respondents on the Problem Gambling Severity Index.

作者信息

Murch W Spencer, Scheurich Rebecca, Monson Eva, French Martin, Kairouz Sylvia

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, T2N 1N4, Canada.

Département des Sciences de la santé communautaire, Université de Sherbrooke - Longueuil, Longueuil, QC, Canada.

出版信息

J Gambl Stud. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.1007/s10899-025-10386-y.

DOI:10.1007/s10899-025-10386-y
PMID:40338426
Abstract

The Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) is a popular tool for assessing past-year problems related to gambling. Multiple categorization schemes have been proposed, with scores 3-7 variously interpreted as reflecting a 'moderate' degree of problems. Crucially, it is possible to land in this Moderate-risk category by reporting one or two persistent problems, or up to seven problems that occur more sporadically. Given that DSM-V gambling disorder may occur either persistently or episodically, this confounding of problems' occurrence and their frequency necessitates the development of a method for delineating the PGSI's Moderate-risk category. We propose a variance clustering approach for understanding Moderate-risk cases on the PGSI. Using 3,868 Moderate-risk cases from an existing database of 18,494 Canadian online gamblers, we use K-means clustering to identify distinct subgroups within the variances of collected PGSI surveys. We find that three clusters (which correspond to lower [61.83%], higher [8.85%], and intermediate [29.32%] variance cases) are not equal in size, and are separated at cutoffs equal to 0.40 and 0.81. These clusters differ in terms of the number of PGSI items endorsed, and multiple dimensions of participants' sociodemographic background. These variance boundaries, and the case clusters they separate, are easy to compute and offer useful context that further informs summed survey scores falling in the Moderate-risk category of the PGSI. Additional applications, and avenues for further research are discussed.

摘要

问题赌博严重程度指数(PGSI)是一种用于评估过去一年与赌博相关问题的常用工具。已经提出了多种分类方案,分数3 - 7被不同地解释为反映“中度”问题程度。至关重要的是,通过报告一两个持续性问题,或者多达七个偶尔出现的问题,都有可能处于这个中度风险类别。鉴于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM - V)中的赌博障碍可能持续出现或间歇性出现,问题发生情况及其频率的这种混淆使得有必要开发一种方法来界定PGSI的中度风险类别。我们提出一种方差聚类方法来理解PGSI上的中度风险案例。利用来自18494名加拿大在线赌徒的现有数据库中的3868个中度风险案例,我们使用K均值聚类来识别收集到的PGSI调查方差内的不同亚组。我们发现三个聚类(分别对应较低方差案例[61.83%]、较高方差案例[8.85%]和中等方差案例[29.32%])大小不等,在等于0.40和0.81的临界值处分开。这些聚类在认可的PGSI项目数量以及参与者社会人口背景的多个维度方面存在差异。这些方差边界以及它们所分隔的案例聚类易于计算,并提供了有用的背景信息,进一步为落在PGSI中度风险类别中的汇总调查分数提供参考。还讨论了其他应用以及进一步研究的途径。

相似文献

1
Distinguishing Persistent Versus Episodic Clusters of At-Risk Respondents on the Problem Gambling Severity Index.在问题赌博严重程度指数上区分高危受访者的持续性与间歇性集群。
J Gambl Stud. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.1007/s10899-025-10386-y.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Group-based interventions to reduce gambling involvement among male football fans: a synopsis of findings from a feasibility study.基于群体的干预措施以减少男性足球迷的赌博行为:一项可行性研究结果概述
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jul;13(6):1-24. doi: 10.3310/SWWP9393.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
6
Psychological interventions for adults who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending.针对有性犯罪行为或有性犯罪风险的成年人的心理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD007507. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007507.pub2.
7
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
8
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
9
Psychological therapies for pathological and problem gambling.针对病态赌博和问题赌博的心理治疗方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):CD008937. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008937.pub2.
10
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing gambling disorder using frequency- and time-based response options: A Rasch analysis of the gambling disorder identification test.使用基于频率和时间的反应选项评估赌博障碍:赌博障碍识别测试的 Rasch 分析。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2024 Mar;33(1):e2018. doi: 10.1002/mpr.2018.
2
Using machine learning to retrospectively predict self-reported gambling problems in Quebec.使用机器学习技术回溯性预测魁北克的自我报告赌博问题。
Addiction. 2023 Aug;118(8):1569-1578. doi: 10.1111/add.16179. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
3
There is (still) a global factor that underlies the PGSI: A reanalysis of Tseng, Flack, Caudwell, and Stevens (2023).
仍有一个全球性因素是 PGSI 的基础:对曾、弗莱克、考德威尔和史蒂文斯(2023 年)的再分析。
Addict Behav. 2023 May;140:107623. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107623. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
4
The Impact of Personalized Feedback Interventions by a Gambling Operator on Subsequent Gambling Expenditure in a Sample of Dutch Online Gamblers.赌博运营商提供个性化反馈干预对荷兰在线赌客后续赌博支出的影响。
J Gambl Stud. 2023 Jun;39(2):929-946. doi: 10.1007/s10899-022-10162-2. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
5
Examination of the Problem Gambling Severity Index for Use with Older Adults: A Rasch Model Approach.老年人问题赌博严重程度指数的检验:一种 Rasch 模型方法。
J Gambl Stud. 2023 Jun;39(2):559-577. doi: 10.1007/s10899-022-10138-2. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
6
Machine learning-based analysis of adolescent gambling factors.基于机器学习的青少年赌博因素分析。
J Behav Addict. 2020 Oct 3;9(3):734-743. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00063. Print 2020 Oct 12.
7
Enhancing the utility of the problem gambling severity index in clinical settings: Identifying refined categories within the problem gambling category.提高问题赌博严重程度指数在临床环境中的效用:在问题赌博类别中确定细化类别。
Addict Behav. 2020 Apr;103:106257. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106257. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
8
Development and validation of the Japanese version of the problem gambling severity index.开发并验证问题赌博严重程度指数的日文版。
Addict Behav. 2019 Nov;98:105987. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 13.
9
Spanish validation of the Problem Gambling Severity Index: A confirmatory factor analysis with sports bettors.西班牙语版问题赌博严重程度指数的验证:对体育博彩者的验证性因素分析。
J Behav Addict. 2018 Sep 1;7(3):814-820. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.84. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
10
Episodic and Binge Gambling: An Exploration and Preliminary Quantitative Study.间歇性和冲动性赌博:一项探索性和初步定量研究。
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Mar;34(1):85-99. doi: 10.1007/s10899-017-9697-z.