Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università degli Studi di Roma 'La Sapienza', Rome, Italy.
Departamento de Psicología, Facultad de Ciencias sociales y humanas, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Dos Hermanas Seville, España.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Jul-Aug;58(4):1316-1334. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12855. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
Bilingualism is widespread and being bilingual is more common than being monolingual. The lifelong practice bilinguals receive from managing two languages seems to lead to a cognitive benefit. Conversely, bilingualism seems to affect language ability negatively due to less use of each known language.
This systematic review aims to summarize the results of the studies on the effect of bilingualism on executive functioning assessed by verbal fluency tasks. The verbal fluency task is a neuropsychological measure of lexical retrieval efficiency and executive functioning.
The review was conducted according to the PRISMA statement through searches in the scientific databases PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science and SCOPUS. Studies included in this review had at least one bilingual and monolingual group, participants over 18 years and one verbal fluency task. Studies that considered bimodal bilingual, second language learners, trilingual or multilingual people, and clinical populations were excluded. A total of 38 studies were included in the systematic review.
Quantitative analysis of performance did not show significant differences between monolinguals and bilinguals. Qualitative results are mixed, and no definitive conclusions can be drawn about a bilingual advantage or disadvantage in the verbal fluency tasks.
Normative data based on the monolingual population are not appropriate to test a bilingual population. It is necessary to take precautions in using this task, especially in clinical practice.
What is already known on the subject Bilingualism seems to lead to a cognitive benefit due to constantly monitoring the known languages to select the most suitable one for each interactional context and to affect language ability negatively due to less use of each known language but also to language ability negatively. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge This systematic review summarizes the results of the studies on the effect of bilingualism on executive functioning assessed by verbal fluency tasks, a neuropsychological measure of lexical retrieval efficiency and executive functioning. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Normative data based on the monolingual population are not appropriate to test a bilingual population. It is necessary to take precautions in using this task, especially in clinical practice.
双语是普遍存在的,而且会双语比只会一种语言更为常见。双语者在管理两种语言的过程中接受的终身实践似乎带来了认知上的好处。相反,由于每种已知语言的使用较少,双语似乎会对语言能力产生负面影响。
本系统综述旨在总结使用词汇流畅性任务评估双语对执行功能影响的研究结果。词汇流畅性任务是一种词汇检索效率和执行功能的神经心理学测量方法。
本综述按照 PRISMA 声明进行,在科学数据库 PsycINFO、PsycARTICLES、MEDLINE、PubMed、Web of Science 和 SCOPUS 中进行了检索。本综述纳入的研究至少有一个双语和单语组,参与者年龄超过 18 岁,且使用了一种词汇流畅性任务。排除了考虑双语者、第二语言学习者、三语或多语者和临床人群的研究。共有 38 项研究纳入了系统综述。
对表现的定量分析显示,单语者和双语者之间没有显著差异。定性结果参差不齐,因此无法就词汇流畅性任务中双语者具有优势或劣势得出明确结论。
基于单语人群的规范数据不适合测试双语人群。在使用该任务时,特别是在临床实践中,需要谨慎。
关于这个主题,已经知道的内容是:由于不断监测已知语言以选择最适合每个交互情境的语言,双语似乎会带来认知上的好处,并且由于每种已知语言的使用较少,双语也会对语言能力产生负面影响,但也会对语言能力产生负面影响。本文在现有知识的基础上增加了什么: 本系统综述总结了使用词汇流畅性任务评估双语对执行功能影响的研究结果,词汇流畅性任务是一种词汇检索效率和执行功能的神经心理学测量方法。这项工作有哪些潜在或实际的临床意义? 基于单语人群的规范数据不适合测试双语人群。在使用该任务时,特别是在临床实践中,需要谨慎。