Saad Jacqueline F, Griffiths Kristi R, Kohn Michael R, Clarke Simon, Williams Leanne M, Korgaonkar Mayuresh S
Brain Dynamics Centre, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Australia; The Discipline of Psychiatry, University of Sydney Medical School: Western, Westmead Hospital, Australia.
Brain Dynamics Centre, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Australia.
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 May 22;15:383-390. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.05.016. eCollection 2017.
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is characterized clinically by hyperactive/impulsive and/or inattentive symptoms which determine diagnostic subtypes as Predominantly Hyperactive-Impulsive (ADHD-HI), Predominantly Inattentive (ADHD-I), and Combined (ADHD-C). Neuroanatomically though we do not yet know if these clinical subtypes reflect distinct aberrations in underlying brain organization. We imaged 34 ADHD participants defined using DSM-IV criteria as ADHD-I ( = 16) or as ADHD-C ( = 18) and 28 matched typically developing controls, aged 8-17 years, using high-resolution T1 MRI. To quantify neuroanatomical organization we used graph theoretical analysis to assess properties of structural covariance between ADHD subtypes and controls (global network measures: path length, clustering coefficient, and regional network measures: nodal degree). As a context for interpreting network organization differences, we also quantified gray matter volume using voxel-based morphometry. Each ADHD subtype was distinguished by a different organizational profile of the degree to which specific regions were anatomically connected with other regions (i.e., in "nodal degree"). For ADHD-I (compared to both ADHD-C and controls) the nodal degree was higher in the hippocampus. ADHD-I also had a higher nodal degree in the supramarginal gyrus, calcarine sulcus, and superior occipital cortex compared to ADHD-C and in the amygdala compared to controls. By contrast, the nodal degree was higher in the cerebellum for ADHD-C compared to ADHD-I and in the anterior cingulate, middle frontal gyrus and putamen compared to controls. ADHD-C also had reduced nodal degree in the rolandic operculum and middle temporal pole compared to controls. These regional profiles were observed in the context of no differences in gray matter volume or global network organization. Our results suggest that the clinical distinction between the Inattentive and Combined subtypes of ADHD may also be reflected in distinct aberrations in underlying brain organization.
注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)在临床上的特征是多动/冲动和/或注意力不集中症状,这些症状决定了诊断亚型,即主要为多动-冲动型(ADHD-HI)、主要为注意力不集中型(ADHD-I)和混合型(ADHD-C)。从神经解剖学角度来看,我们尚不清楚这些临床亚型是否反映了潜在脑组织结构的明显异常。我们对34名根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》(DSM-IV)标准定义为ADHD-I(n = 16)或ADHD-C(n = 18)的ADHD参与者以及28名年龄在8至17岁的匹配的正常发育对照者进行了高分辨率T1磁共振成像(MRI)。为了量化神经解剖组织,我们使用图论分析来评估ADHD亚型与对照者之间结构协方差的属性(全局网络测量指标:路径长度、聚类系数,以及区域网络测量指标:节点度)。作为解释网络组织差异的背景,我们还使用基于体素的形态测量法对灰质体积进行了量化。每种ADHD亚型都以特定区域与其他区域在解剖学上的连接程度(即“节点度”)的不同组织特征为区别。对于ADHD-I(与ADHD-C和对照者相比),海马体的节点度更高。与ADHD-C相比,ADHD-I在缘上回、距状沟和枕叶上回的节点度也更高,与对照者相比,杏仁核的节点度更高。相比之下,与ADHD-I相比,ADHD-C的小脑节点度更高,与对照者相比,前扣带回、额中回和壳核的节点度更高。与对照者相比,ADHD-C在中央 operculum和颞中极的节点度也降低。在灰质体积或全局网络组织无差异的背景下观察到了这些区域特征。我们的结果表明,ADHD注意力不集中型和混合型亚型之间的临床区别也可能反映在潜在脑组织结构的明显异常中。