• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重大创伤后 1 年的功能结局:英国 1 级创伤中心的经验。

One-year functional outcomes following major trauma: experience of a UK level 1 major trauma centre.

机构信息

1 National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, UK.

2 Oxford Major Trauma Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Clin Rehabil. 2017 Dec;31(12):1646-1652. doi: 10.1177/0269215517712044. Epub 2017 Jun 5.

DOI:10.1177/0269215517712044
PMID:28580790
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To pilot a method for routine outcome data collection one year after admission to a major trauma centre, to determine current outcomes, and to identify possible methodological improvements.

DESIGN

A postal questionnaire audit.

SETTING

A major trauma centre in the United Kingdom.

SUBJECTS

In total, 355 patients known to be alive 12 months after admission with major trauma (Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 9 or more).

INTERVENTIONS

All patients received standard trauma and rehabilitation services available to them.

MAIN MEASURES

The main measures used are as follows: ISS; EuroQol, five dimensions five levels (EQ-5D-5L); single questions about accommodation, mobility, and self-care; demographic and injury data collected from hospital records; and outcome data by postal questionnaire.

RESULTS

In total, 429 patients were registered over six months: at one year, 64 had died and 10 had no UK address. In total, 355 questionnaires were sent out: 179 (50%) were never returned, 154 (43%) were returned with complete data, 11 forms were incomplete, 7 patients were dead, and 4 were not at the address contacted. Of the 154 with complete data, 91 had new mobility problems and 54 had new problems with personal activities. Of the 68 previously employed, 19 were unemployed, 38 were fully employed in the same job, and 13 had altered jobs. There was no association between Injury Severity Score and any of the outcome scores.

CONCLUSION

A short simple questionnaire sent only once achieved a complete data set response rate of 43%. The outcome data are consistent with experience in other studies. Collection of data on specific functional outcomes might be most sensitive.

摘要

目的

试点一种在主要创伤中心入院后一年常规采集结局数据的方法,以确定当前结局,并确定可能的方法学改进。

设计

邮寄问卷调查审核。

地点

英国一家主要创伤中心。

对象

共 355 例已知在创伤后 12 个月存活且创伤严重度评分(ISS)≥9 分的严重创伤患者。

干预措施

所有患者均接受标准创伤和康复服务。

主要措施

主要措施如下:ISS;欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D-5L);关于住宿、活动能力和自理能力的单项问题;从医院记录中收集人口统计学和损伤数据;以及通过邮寄问卷获得结局数据。

结果

共登记 6 个月内的 429 例患者:1 年后,64 例死亡,10 例患者没有英国地址。共寄出 355 份问卷:179 份(50%)从未返回,154 份(43%)返回时有完整数据,11 份表格不完整,7 例患者死亡,4 例患者未联系到所联系的地址。在 154 份完整数据中,91 例有新的活动能力问题,54 例有新的自理活动问题。在 68 例曾有工作的患者中,19 例失业,38 例在同一工作中完全就业,13 例改变了工作。损伤严重度评分与任何结局评分均无相关性。

结论

仅发送一次的简短简单问卷获得了 43%的完整数据集应答率。结局数据与其他研究中的经验一致。特定功能结局数据的采集可能最敏感。

相似文献

1
One-year functional outcomes following major trauma: experience of a UK level 1 major trauma centre.重大创伤后 1 年的功能结局:英国 1 级创伤中心的经验。
Clin Rehabil. 2017 Dec;31(12):1646-1652. doi: 10.1177/0269215517712044. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
2
Factors affecting planned return to work after trauma: A prospective descriptive qualitative and quantitative study.创伤后影响计划复工的因素:一项前瞻性描述性定性与定量研究。
Injury. 2016 Dec;47(12):2664-2670. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.09.040. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
3
Impact of the severity of trauma on early retirement.创伤严重程度对提前退休的影响。
Injury. 2014 Mar;45(3):618-23. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
4
Moving beyond personnel and process: a case for incorporating outcome measures in the trauma center designation process.超越人员与流程:在创伤中心指定过程中纳入结果指标的理由。
Arch Surg. 2008 Feb;143(2):115-9; discussion 120. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2007.29.
5
Outcomes of patients with orthopaedic trauma admitted to level 1 trauma centres.入住一级创伤中心的骨科创伤患者的治疗结果。
ANZ J Surg. 2006 Jul;76(7):600-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03785.x.
6
Traumatic injury in the United States: In-patient epidemiology 2000-2011.美国的创伤性损伤:2000 - 2011年住院患者流行病学
Injury. 2016 Jul;47(7):1393-403. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
7
A study of outcomes of patients treated at a UK major trauma centre for moderate or severe injuries one to three years after injury.一项对 UK 大型创伤中心的中度或重度创伤患者在受伤后 1 至 3 年的治疗结果进行的研究。
Clin Rehabil. 2018 Mar;32(3):410-418. doi: 10.1177/0269215517730862. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
8
iTACTIC - implementing Treatment Algorithms for the Correction of Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.iTACTIC——实施创伤性凝血病纠正治疗算法:一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Oct 18;18(1):486. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2224-9.
9
Outcome measures in major trauma care: a review of current international trauma registry practice.创伤救治结局指标:国际创伤登记实践现状综述。
Emerg Med J. 2011 Dec;28(12):1008-12. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2011-200326. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
10
Prevalence and prognostic factors of disability after childhood injury.儿童期受伤后残疾的患病率及预后因素。
Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):e810-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1035.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of health-related quality of life in the German TraumaRegister DGU® - first results of a pilot study.健康相关生活质量在德国创伤登记处 DGU®中的实施 - 一项试点研究的初步结果。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Jun 5;22(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02261-y.
2
A scoping review on the challenges, improvement programs, and relevant output metrics for neurotrauma services in major trauma centers.一项关于主要创伤中心神经创伤服务的挑战、改进计划及相关产出指标的范围综述。
Surg Neurol Int. 2022 Apr 29;13:171. doi: 10.25259/SNI_203_2022. eCollection 2022.
3
An economic evaluation of triage tools for patients with suspected severe injuries in England.
英格兰疑似严重创伤患者分诊工具的经济评估。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Jan 11;22(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00557-6.
4
Measuring post-discharge socioeconomic and quality of life outcomes in trauma patients: a scoping review.创伤患者出院后社会经济状况及生活质量结局的测量:一项范围综述
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021 Aug 9;5(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00346-6.
5
Health status and psychological outcomes after trauma: A prospective multicenter cohort study.创伤后健康状况和心理结局:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 21;15(4):e0231649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231649. eCollection 2020.
6
Predictors of Change in Functional Outcome at six months and twelve months after Severe Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study.严重损伤后 6 个月和 12 个月功能结局变化的预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Dec 3;13:57. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0217-y. eCollection 2018.
7
Long-Term Follow-Up After Non-operative Management of Blunt Splenic and Liver Injuries: A Questionnaire-Based Survey.钝性脾损伤和肝损伤非手术治疗后的长期随访:一项基于问卷的调查
World J Surg. 2018 May;42(5):1358-1363. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4336-5.