Ko Byung-Soo, Drakos Stavros G, Welt Frederick G P, Shah Rashmee U
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, 30 North 1900 East, Room 4A100, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, 30 North 1900 East, Room 4A100, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
Interv Cardiol Clin. 2016 Oct;5(4):541-549. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
The prognosis in ST-elevation myocardial infarction has improved with coronary care units, revascularization, and anticoagulant strategies; however, cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a highly fatal condition. Controversies remain about optimal pharmacologic therapies, revascularization strategies, the role of mechanical circulatory support (MCS), and evidence-based patient selection. The current informed consent paradigm for clinical trials creates challenges testing treatments in CS patients, who are too ill to consent and require immediate treatment. Several trials are underway comparing revascularization strategies and MCS options. Although the prognosis is grim, careful, new and existing treatments could change the course of this condition in the coming years.
随着冠心病监护病房、血运重建和抗凝策略的应用,ST段抬高型心肌梗死的预后已有所改善;然而,心源性休克(CS)仍然是一种高致死性疾病。关于最佳药物治疗、血运重建策略、机械循环支持(MCS)的作用以及基于证据的患者选择仍存在争议。目前临床试验的知情同意模式给CS患者的治疗试验带来了挑战,这些患者病情太重无法同意,且需要立即治疗。目前正在进行几项试验,比较血运重建策略和MCS选项。尽管预后严峻,但谨慎应用新的和现有的治疗方法可能会在未来几年改变这种疾病的病程。