Guerbaii Raphaëlle-Ashley, Fustier Gabriel, Ennezat Pierre-Vladimir, Ringle Anne, Trouillet Camille, Graux Pierre, Vincentelli André, Tribouilloy Christophe, Maréchaux Sylvestre
Department of cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Department of cardiology and heart valve center, GCS-Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille (GHICL), Faculté de Médecine et de Maïeutique de Lille / Université Catholique de Lille, Lille, France.
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 5;12(6):e0178932. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178932. eCollection 2017.
Clinical and echocardiography follow-up is recommended in patients with aortic stenosis to detect symptom onset, thus a watchful waiting approach has to be safe and effective. For both AS patients and their general practitioners, evaluation of valvular heart disease (VHD) knowledge, after the indexed specialized assessment has never been measured.
To evaluate the knowledge of clinical symptoms of aortic stenosis by both patients and their general practitioner.
Sixty-four patients, with moderate to severe and initially asymptomatic AS (median AVA (interquartile range) 1.01(0.80-1.15) cm2) previously referred to a tertiary center and medically managed for at least 6 months after the index echocardiogram, and their primary care doctors were interviewed on the phone and asked to answer specific questions related to knowledge of aortic stenosis symptoms.
Fifty-six percent of patients quoted shortness of breath as one of the aortic stenosis symptoms, and only 16% knew the 3 aortic stenosis symptoms. Fifty percent of patients reported having received sufficient information regarding aortic stenosis; only 48% remembered receiving information regarding specific symptoms. Only 14% general practitioners quoted the 3 specific symptoms. According to the initial recommendation, only 41 patients (64%) benefitted from a 6-to-12 month clinical and echocardiography follow up.
GPs are not sufficiently trained to safely manage AS patients in the community and to ensure adequate follow-up and monitoring. AS patients were not properly informed about their diagnosis and symptomatology. Hence, therapeutic education should be improved for patients with asymptomatic AS and continuous medical education on VHD should be reinforced, for GPs.
对于主动脉瓣狭窄患者,建议进行临床和超声心动图随访以检测症状发作,因此密切观察等待策略必须安全有效。对于主动脉瓣狭窄患者及其全科医生而言,在进行索引式专业评估后,尚未对瓣膜性心脏病(VHD)知识进行评估。
评估患者及其全科医生对主动脉瓣狭窄临床症状的了解情况。
对64例中度至重度且最初无症状的主动脉瓣狭窄患者(主动脉瓣面积中位数(四分位间距)为1.01(0.80 - 1.15)cm²)进行电话访谈,这些患者此前已转诊至三级中心,并在索引超声心动图检查后接受了至少6个月的药物治疗,同时询问他们及其初级保健医生与主动脉瓣狭窄症状知识相关的特定问题。
56%的患者将呼吸急促列为主动脉瓣狭窄症状之一,只有16%的患者知道主动脉瓣狭窄的3种症状。50%的患者报告已获得有关主动脉瓣狭窄的充分信息;只有48%的患者记得收到过有关特定症状的信息。只有14%的全科医生提到了这3种特定症状。根据最初的建议,只有41例患者(64%)受益于6至12个月的临床和超声心动图随访。
全科医生未接受足够培训以在社区安全管理主动脉瓣狭窄患者并确保进行充分的随访和监测。主动脉瓣狭窄患者未得到关于其诊断和症状的适当告知。因此,应改善无症状主动脉瓣狭窄患者的治疗教育,并加强全科医生关于瓣膜性心脏病的持续医学教育。