Suppr超能文献

经胸多普勒超声心动图测量主动脉瓣口面积对严重无症状性主动脉瓣狭窄患者的预后价值。

Prognostic Value of Aortic Valve Area by Doppler Echocardiography in Patients With Severe Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis.

机构信息

Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille/Faculté libre de médecine, Université Lille Nord de France, Lille, France INSERM U-1088, Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France.

Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille/Faculté libre de médecine, Université Lille Nord de France, Lille, France.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 May 3;5(5):e003146. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.003146.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between aortic valve area (AVA) obtained by Doppler echocardiography and outcome in patients with severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis and to define a specific threshold of AVA for identifying asymptomatic patients at very high risk based on their clinical outcome.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We included 199 patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AVA ≤1.0 cm(2)). The risk of events (death or need for aortic valve replacement) increased linearly on the scale of log hazard with decreased AVA (adjusted hazard ratio 1.17; 95% CI 1.06-1.29 per 0.1 cm(2) AVA decrement; P=0.002). Event-free survival at 12, 24, and 48 months was 63±6%, 51±6%, and 34±6%, respectively, for AVA 0.8 to 1 cm(2); 49±6%, 36±6%, and 26±6%, respectively, for AVA 0.6 to 0.8 cm(2); and 33±8%, 20±7%, and 11±5%, respectively, for AVA ≤0.6 cm(2) (Ptrend=0.002). Patients with AVA ≤0.6 cm(2) had a significantly increased risk of events compared with patients with AVA 0.8 to 1 cm(2) (adjusted hazard ratio 2.22; 95% CI 1.41-3.52; P=0.001), whereas patients with AVA 0.6 to 0.8 cm(2) had an increased risk of events compared with those with AVA 0.8 to 1 cm(2), but the difference was not statistically significant (adjusted hazard ratio 1.38; 95% CI 0.93-2.05; P=0.11). After adjustment for covariates and aortic valve replacement as a time-dependent variable, patients with AVA ≤0.6 cm(2) had a significantly greater risk of all-cause mortality than patients with AVA >0.6 cm(2) (hazard ratio 3.39; 95% CI 1.80-6.40; P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis and AVA ≤0.6 cm(2) displayed an important increase in the risk of adverse events during short-term follow-up. Further studies are needed to determine whether elective aortic valve replacement improves outcome in this high-risk subgroup of patients.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估经多普勒超声心动图测量的主动脉瓣口面积(AVA)与严重无症状性主动脉瓣狭窄患者预后之间的关系,并确定基于临床结果识别极高风险无症状患者的特定 AVA 阈值。

方法和结果

我们纳入了 199 例无症状性重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AVA≤1.0cm²)患者。风险事件(死亡或主动脉瓣置换需求)的发生率随 AVA 下降呈对数风险线性增加(每降低 0.1cm² AVA,校正风险比为 1.17;95%CI,1.06-1.29;P=0.002)。12、24 和 48 个月时的无事件生存率分别为:AVA 0.8 至 1cm²时为 63±6%、51±6%和 34±6%;AVA 0.6 至 0.8cm²时为 49±6%、36±6%和 26±6%;AVA≤0.6cm²时为 33±8%、20±7%和 11±5%(Ptrend=0.002)。与 AVA 0.8 至 1cm²的患者相比,AVA≤0.6cm²的患者发生风险事件的风险显著增加(校正风险比 2.22;95%CI,1.41-3.52;P=0.001),而 AVA 0.6 至 0.8cm²的患者发生风险事件的风险虽高于 AVA 0.8 至 1cm²的患者,但差异无统计学意义(校正风险比 1.38;95%CI,0.93-2.05;P=0.11)。在校正协变量和主动脉瓣置换(作为一个时变变量)后,AVA≤0.6cm²的患者全因死亡率显著高于 AVA>0.6cm²的患者(风险比 3.39;95%CI,1.80-6.40;P<0.0001)。

结论

在短期随访中,严重无症状性主动脉瓣狭窄且 AVA≤0.6cm²的患者发生不良事件的风险显著增加。需要进一步的研究来确定在这一高危亚组患者中,择期主动脉瓣置换是否能改善预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7051/4889185/3d9c187ad8e3/JAH3-5-e003146-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验