文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

经胸多普勒超声心动图测量主动脉瓣口面积对严重无症状性主动脉瓣狭窄患者的预后价值。

Prognostic Value of Aortic Valve Area by Doppler Echocardiography in Patients With Severe Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis.

机构信息

Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille/Faculté libre de médecine, Université Lille Nord de France, Lille, France INSERM U-1088, Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France.

Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille/Faculté libre de médecine, Université Lille Nord de France, Lille, France.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 May 3;5(5):e003146. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.003146.


DOI:10.1161/JAHA.115.003146
PMID:27143354
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4889185/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between aortic valve area (AVA) obtained by Doppler echocardiography and outcome in patients with severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis and to define a specific threshold of AVA for identifying asymptomatic patients at very high risk based on their clinical outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 199 patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AVA ≤1.0 cm(2)). The risk of events (death or need for aortic valve replacement) increased linearly on the scale of log hazard with decreased AVA (adjusted hazard ratio 1.17; 95% CI 1.06-1.29 per 0.1 cm(2) AVA decrement; P=0.002). Event-free survival at 12, 24, and 48 months was 63±6%, 51±6%, and 34±6%, respectively, for AVA 0.8 to 1 cm(2); 49±6%, 36±6%, and 26±6%, respectively, for AVA 0.6 to 0.8 cm(2); and 33±8%, 20±7%, and 11±5%, respectively, for AVA ≤0.6 cm(2) (Ptrend=0.002). Patients with AVA ≤0.6 cm(2) had a significantly increased risk of events compared with patients with AVA 0.8 to 1 cm(2) (adjusted hazard ratio 2.22; 95% CI 1.41-3.52; P=0.001), whereas patients with AVA 0.6 to 0.8 cm(2) had an increased risk of events compared with those with AVA 0.8 to 1 cm(2), but the difference was not statistically significant (adjusted hazard ratio 1.38; 95% CI 0.93-2.05; P=0.11). After adjustment for covariates and aortic valve replacement as a time-dependent variable, patients with AVA ≤0.6 cm(2) had a significantly greater risk of all-cause mortality than patients with AVA >0.6 cm(2) (hazard ratio 3.39; 95% CI 1.80-6.40; P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis and AVA ≤0.6 cm(2) displayed an important increase in the risk of adverse events during short-term follow-up. Further studies are needed to determine whether elective aortic valve replacement improves outcome in this high-risk subgroup of patients.

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估经多普勒超声心动图测量的主动脉瓣口面积(AVA)与严重无症状性主动脉瓣狭窄患者预后之间的关系,并确定基于临床结果识别极高风险无症状患者的特定 AVA 阈值。

方法和结果:我们纳入了 199 例无症状性重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AVA≤1.0cm²)患者。风险事件(死亡或主动脉瓣置换需求)的发生率随 AVA 下降呈对数风险线性增加(每降低 0.1cm² AVA,校正风险比为 1.17;95%CI,1.06-1.29;P=0.002)。12、24 和 48 个月时的无事件生存率分别为:AVA 0.8 至 1cm²时为 63±6%、51±6%和 34±6%;AVA 0.6 至 0.8cm²时为 49±6%、36±6%和 26±6%;AVA≤0.6cm²时为 33±8%、20±7%和 11±5%(Ptrend=0.002)。与 AVA 0.8 至 1cm²的患者相比,AVA≤0.6cm²的患者发生风险事件的风险显著增加(校正风险比 2.22;95%CI,1.41-3.52;P=0.001),而 AVA 0.6 至 0.8cm²的患者发生风险事件的风险虽高于 AVA 0.8 至 1cm²的患者,但差异无统计学意义(校正风险比 1.38;95%CI,0.93-2.05;P=0.11)。在校正协变量和主动脉瓣置换(作为一个时变变量)后,AVA≤0.6cm²的患者全因死亡率显著高于 AVA>0.6cm²的患者(风险比 3.39;95%CI,1.80-6.40;P<0.0001)。

结论:在短期随访中,严重无症状性主动脉瓣狭窄且 AVA≤0.6cm²的患者发生不良事件的风险显著增加。需要进一步的研究来确定在这一高危亚组患者中,择期主动脉瓣置换是否能改善预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7051/4889185/3bf45026e9cc/JAH3-5-e003146-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7051/4889185/3d9c187ad8e3/JAH3-5-e003146-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7051/4889185/ec898fc79415/JAH3-5-e003146-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7051/4889185/24f3c43a4c7e/JAH3-5-e003146-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7051/4889185/a74315ffa7de/JAH3-5-e003146-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7051/4889185/3bf45026e9cc/JAH3-5-e003146-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7051/4889185/3d9c187ad8e3/JAH3-5-e003146-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7051/4889185/ec898fc79415/JAH3-5-e003146-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7051/4889185/24f3c43a4c7e/JAH3-5-e003146-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7051/4889185/a74315ffa7de/JAH3-5-e003146-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7051/4889185/3bf45026e9cc/JAH3-5-e003146-g005.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Prognostic Value of Aortic Valve Area by Doppler Echocardiography in Patients With Severe Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis.

J Am Heart Assoc. 2016-5-3

[2]
Outcome Implication of Aortic Valve Area Normalized to Body Size in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis.

Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016-11

[3]
Discordant Grading of Aortic Stenosis Severity: Echocardiographic Predictors of Survival Benefit Associated With Aortic Valve Replacement.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016-5-18

[4]
Stress echocardiography to assess stenosis severity and predict outcome in patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis and preserved LVEF.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013-2

[5]
Contribution of Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography to the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Low-Flow/Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

J Heart Valve Dis. 2016-3

[6]
Aortic valve area calculation in aortic stenosis by CT and Doppler echocardiography.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015-3

[7]
Clinical features and prognosis of patients with isolated severe aortic stenosis and valve area less than 1.0 cm.

Heart. 2017-8-16

[8]
Complications and outcome of balloon aortic valvuloplasty in high-risk or inoperable patients.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010-11

[9]
Prognostic Impact of Aortic Valve Area in Conservatively Managed Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

J Am Heart Assoc. 2019-2-5

[10]
Value of ejection fraction/velocity ratio in the prognostic stratification of patients with asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis.

Echocardiography. 2018-12

引用本文的文献

[1]
Natural history of initially asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a one-stage meta-analysis.

Clin Res Cardiol. 2025-3

[2]
What can we do to improve the diagnosis and treatment of aortic stenosis?

Br J Cardiol. 2023-1-18

[3]
Severe aortic stenosis is associated with perioperative mortality in proximal femur fracture patients.

OTA Int. 2020-5-5

[4]
Echocardiographic assessment of aortic stenosis: a practical guideline from the British Society of Echocardiography.

Echo Res Pract. 2021-4-28

[5]
Prognostic Impact of Aortic Valve Area in Conservatively Managed Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

J Am Heart Assoc. 2019-2-5

[6]
How Should Very Severe Aortic Stenosis Be Defined in Asymptomatic Individuals?

J Am Heart Assoc. 2019-2-5

[7]
Association of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: Natural Course and Prognostic Value.

JAMA Cardiol. 2018-9-1

[8]
Asymptomatic versus Symptomatic Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Sci Rep. 2018-7-4

[9]
Asymptomatic aortic stenosis: An assessment of patients' and of their general practitioners' knowledge, after an indexed specialized assessment in community practice.

PLoS One. 2017-6-5

[10]
Electrocardiographic appearance of aortic stenosis before and after aortic valve replacement.

Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2017-9

本文引用的文献

[1]
Initial Surgical Versus Conservative Strategies in Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015-10-15

[2]
Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015-3

[3]
Low-gradient, low-flow severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: characteristics, outcome, and implications for surgery.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015-1-6

[4]
The value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in individuals with apparently asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a pilot study.

Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2014-10

[5]
2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Circulation. 2014-6-10

[6]
Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012).

Eur Heart J. 2012-10

[7]
Relationship between cutoff values of peak aortic valve velocity and those of other Doppler echocardiographic parameters of severity in patients with aortic stenosis and normal flow.

Echocardiography. 2012-11

[8]
Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation: comparison among cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011-11-15

[9]
Management of asymptomatic aortic stenosis.

Heart. 2011-2

[10]
Impact of valvuloarterial impedance on left ventricular longitudinal deformation in patients with aortic valve stenosis and preserved ejection fraction.

Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2010-5-20

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索