From the George Institute for Global Health (A.B., C.K.C., R.W., A.S., A.P., B.N., D.P., J.T., J.C., M.W., A.R.) and Charles Perkins Centre (C.K.C., B.N.), University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (C.K.C., J.T.); The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.H., T.U., A.R.); The University of Western Australia, Perth (G.S.H.); Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD (M.C.); Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, University College London, United Kingdom (H.-M.D.); Imperial College, London, United Kingdom (B.N., S.T.); Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia (M.N.); Curtin University, Perth, Australia (C.R.); and Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (A.P., B.N.).
Hypertension. 2017 Jul;70(1):85-93. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09202. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
There is a critical need for blood pressure-lowering strategies that have greater efficacy and minimal side effects. Low-dose combinations hold promise in this regard, but there are few data on very-low-dose therapy. We, therefore, conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with at least one quarter-dose and one placebo and standard-dose monotherapy arm. A search was conducted of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Registry, Food and Drug Administration, and European Medicinal Agency websites. Data on blood pressure and adverse events were pooled using a fixed-effect model, and bias was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias. The review included 42 trials involving 20 284 participants. Thirty-six comparisons evaluated quarter-dose with placebo and indicated a blood pressure reduction of -4.7/-2.4 mm Hg (<0.001). Six comparisons were of dual quarter-dose therapy versus placebo, observing a -6.7/ -4.4 mm Hg (<0.001) blood pressure reduction. There were no trials of triple quarter-dose combination versus placebo, but one quadruple quarter-dose study observed a blood pressure reduction of -22.4/-13.1 mm Hg versus placebo (<0.001). Compared with standard-dose monotherapy, the blood pressure differences achieved by single (37 comparisons), dual (7 comparisons), and quadruple (1 trial) quarter-dose combinations were +3.7/+2.6 (<0.001), +1.3/-0.3 (NS), and -13.1/-7.9 (<0.001) mm Hg, respectively. In terms of adverse events, single and dual quarter-dose therapy was not significantly different from placebo and had significantly fewer adverse events compared with standard-dose monotherapy. Quarter-dose combinations could provide improvements in efficacy and tolerability of blood pressure-lowering therapy.
非常需要具有更高疗效和最小副作用的降压策略。低剂量联合用药在这方面有希望,但关于极低剂量治疗的数据很少。因此,我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,纳入了至少一个四分之一剂量、一个安慰剂和一个标准剂量单药治疗组的随机对照试验。我们在 Medline、Embase、Cochrane 注册中心、美国食品药品监督管理局和欧洲药品管理局的网站上进行了搜索。使用固定效应模型汇总血压和不良事件数据,并使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险评估评估偏差。该综述纳入了 42 项涉及 20284 名参与者的试验。36 项比较评估了四分之一剂量与安慰剂,表明血压降低了-4.7/-2.4mmHg(<0.001)。6 项比较是双重四分之一剂量治疗与安慰剂的比较,观察到血压降低了-6.7/-4.4mmHg(<0.001)。没有三倍四分之一剂量联合治疗与安慰剂的试验,但一项四重四分之一剂量研究观察到与安慰剂相比血压降低了-22.4/-13.1mmHg(<0.001)。与标准剂量单药治疗相比,单一(37 项比较)、双重(7 项比较)和四重(1 项试验)四分之一剂量联合治疗的血压差异分别为+3.7/+2.6(<0.001)、+1.3/-0.3(NS)和-13.1/-7.9(<0.001)mmHg。就不良事件而言,单一和双重四分之一剂量治疗与安慰剂相比无显著差异,且与标准剂量单药治疗相比不良事件明显更少。四分之一剂量联合治疗可能在提高降压治疗的疗效和耐受性方面有所改善。