Suppr超能文献

美国生物医学研究基础发现的未来。

Future of fundamental discovery in US biomedical research.

机构信息

Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305;

Statistical Cybermetrics Research Group, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jun 20;114(25):6498-6503. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1609996114. Epub 2017 Jun 5.

Abstract

Young researchers are crucially important for basic science as they make unexpected, fundamental discoveries. Since 1982, we find a steady drop in the number of grant-eligible basic-science faculty [principal investigators (PIs)] younger than 46. This fall occurred over a 32-y period when inflation-corrected congressional funds for NIH almost tripled. During this time, the PI success ratio (fraction of basic-science PIs who are R01 grantees) dropped for younger PIs (below 46) and increased for older PIs (above 55). This age-related bias seems to have caused the steady drop in the number of young basic-science PIs and could reduce future US discoveries in fundamental biomedical science. The NIH recognized this bias in its 2008 early-stage investigator (ESI) policy to fund young PIs at higher rates. We show this policy is working and recommend that it be enhanced by using better data. Together with the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) Maximizing Investigators' Research Award (MIRA) program to reward senior PIs with research time in exchange for less funding, this may reverse a decades-long trend of more money going to older PIs. To prepare young scientists for increased demand, additional resources should be devoted to transitional postdoctoral fellowships already offered by NIH.

摘要

青年研究人员对于基础科学至关重要,因为他们能够做出意想不到的、基础性的发现。自 1982 年以来,我们发现,46 岁以下符合资助条件的基础科学教师[主要研究者(PI)]人数稳步下降。这一下降发生在 32 年期间,期间 NIH 的国会资金经通胀调整后几乎翻了三倍。在此期间,年轻的 PI(低于 46 岁)的 PI 成功率(获得 R01 资助的基础科学 PI 比例)下降,而年龄较大的 PI(超过 55 岁)的 PI 成功率则上升。这种与年龄相关的偏见似乎导致了年轻基础科学 PI 人数的稳步下降,并可能减少美国未来在基础生物医学科学方面的发现。NIH 在其 2008 年早期研究者(ESI)政策中认识到了这种偏见,该政策以更高的比例为年轻 PI 提供资金。我们表明,该政策正在发挥作用,并建议通过使用更好的数据来加强该政策。与国家普通医学科学研究所(NIGMS)的奖励资深 PI 研究时间以换取较少资金的奖励资深 PI 的最大化研究者研究奖(MIRA)计划一起,这可能会扭转数十年来资金更多地流向年长 PI 的趋势。为了让年轻科学家做好需求增加的准备,应将更多资源用于 NIH 已经提供的过渡性博士后奖学金。

相似文献

1
Future of fundamental discovery in US biomedical research.美国生物医学研究基础发现的未来。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jun 20;114(25):6498-6503. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1609996114. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
9
NIH Funding for Surgeon-Scientists in the US: What Is the Current Status?美国外科医生科学家的 NIH 资助:现状如何?
J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Mar;232(3):265-274.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.12.015. Epub 2021 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1

本文引用的文献

2
Basic science: Bedrock of progress.基础科学:进步的基石。
Science. 2016 Mar 25;351(6280):1405. doi: 10.1126/science.351.6280.1405-a.
9
Research groups: How big should they be?研究团队:规模应该有多大?
PeerJ. 2015 Jun 9;3:e989. doi: 10.7717/peerj.989. eCollection 2015.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验