a Department of Communication Studies , Sam Houston State University.
Health Commun. 2018 Jul;33(7):877-886. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1321161. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
To account for the effect of prevention-message exposure on binge drinking among college students, I hypothesized a conceptual model outlining potential mechanisms including perceived probability of negative consequences (PPNC), perceived severity of negative consequences (PSNC), perceived probability of positive consequences (PPPC), and perceived beneficiality of positive consequences (PBPC) from binge drinking, based on the two-step process model. I conducted an online survey at a public university in the US (N = 278). Findings suggested only PBPC was significantly related to binge drinking and the relationship was positive; prevention-message exposure was not directly associated with binge drinking, but was positively associated with PPNC, PSNC, PPPC, and PBPC; none of the mediational paths was significant; higher risk perception (interaction between PPNC and PSNC) was significantly related to less binge drinking, while benefit perception (interaction between PPPC and PBPC) was not predictive of binge drinking. Implications of findings were discussed.
为了解释预防信息暴露对大学生 binge drinking 的影响,我假设了一个概念模型,该模型概述了潜在的机制,包括对负面后果的感知概率 (PPNC)、对负面后果的感知严重程度 (PSNC)、对正面后果的感知概率 (PPPC) 和对正面后果的感知益处 (PBPC),这些都是基于两步过程模型。我在美国的一所公立大学进行了一项在线调查(N=278)。结果表明,只有 PBPC 与 binge drinking 显著相关,且呈正相关;预防信息暴露与 binge drinking 没有直接关联,但与 PPNC、PSNC、PPPC 和 PBPC 呈正相关;中介路径均不显著;更高的风险感知(PPNC 和 PSNC 的交互作用)与更少的 binge drinking 显著相关,而益处感知(PPPC 和 PBPC 的交互作用)不能预测 binge drinking。讨论了研究结果的意义。