Contreras Fernando, Albacete Auria, Tebé Cristian, Benejam Bessy, Caño Agnes, Menchón José Manuel
Department of Psychiatry, Bellvitge University Hospital- IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
Department of Clinical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 6;12(6):e0178860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178860. eCollection 2017.
The main variables assessed were: answer to complete a target task (wrong or correctly), and percentage gain in the reaction time (RT) to complete a target task correctly depending on whether the prime was a counterfactual or a neutral-control cue. These variables were assessed in 37 patients with schizophrenia and 37 healthy controls. Potential associations with clinical status and socio-demographic characteristics were also explored.
When a counterfactual prime was presented, the probability of giving an incorrect answer was lower for the entire sample than when a neutral prime was presented (OR 0.58; CI 95% 0.42 to 0.79), but the schizophrenia patients showed a higher probability than the controls of giving an incorrect answer (OR 3.89; CI 95% 2.0 to 7.6). Both the schizophrenia patients and the controls showed a similar percentage gain in RT to a correct answer of 8%.
Challenging the results of previous research, our findings suggest a normal activation of behavioural intentions facilitated by CFT in schizophrenia. Nevertheless, the patients showed more difficulty than the controls with the task, adding support to the concept of CFT as a potential new target for consideration in future therapeutic approaches for this illness.
评估的主要变量包括:完成目标任务的答案(错误或正确),以及根据启动刺激是反事实线索还是中性对照线索,正确完成目标任务时反应时间(RT)的百分比增益。在37例精神分裂症患者和37名健康对照者中对这些变量进行了评估。还探讨了与临床状态和社会人口学特征的潜在关联。
当呈现反事实启动刺激时,整个样本给出错误答案的概率低于呈现中性启动刺激时(比值比0.58;95%置信区间0.42至0.79),但精神分裂症患者给出错误答案的概率高于对照组(比值比3.89;95%置信区间2.0至7.6)。精神分裂症患者和对照组在正确答案的反应时间上的百分比增益相似,均为8%。
与先前研究结果不同,我们的研究结果表明,反事实思维训练(CFT)促进了精神分裂症患者行为意图的正常激活。然而,患者在任务上比对照组表现出更多困难,这为将CFT作为该疾病未来治疗方法中一个潜在的新靶点的概念提供了支持。