Department of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience-IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, "Dino Ferrari" Center, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 16;16(2):e0246388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246388. eCollection 2021.
The ability to simulate alternatives to factual events is called counterfactual thinking (CFT) and it is involved both in emotional and behavioral regulation. CFT deficits have been reported in psychiatric and neurological conditions, possibly contributing to patients' difficulties in modulating behaviors and affections. Thus, acknowledging the presence and possible consequences of CFT impairments might be essential for optimal clinical management.
This scoping review aims to summarize the previous evidence about CFT in psychiatric and neurological diseases to determine the extent of the previous research and what has been discovered so far, the variety of clinical conditions considered, the methodologies adopted, and the relevant issues to be addressed by future investigations.
PsycInfo, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched to identify articles published up to January 2020, written in English and focused on CFT in adults affected by psychiatric or neurological conditions.
Twenty-nine studies have been included; most of them focused on psychiatric conditions, a minority considered neurological diseases. The generation of counterfactual thoughts related to a negative real-life or a fictional event and the counterfactual inference test were the most popular tasks adopted. CFT impairments were reported in both psychiatric and neurological conditions, likely associated with a fronto-executive dysfunction.
Future research might further explore CFT in those psychiatric and neurological conditions in which CFT difficulties have been preliminary reported. Furthermore, it would be recommendable to extend this investigation to all the clinical conditions possibly at risk of fronto-executive dysfunction. In the end, we speculate that since CFT plays a role in driving everyday behaviors, it might be crucial also when medical decisions are involved; thus, future research might extend the investigation of CFT especially to those populations that implicate complex clinical management.
模拟事实事件替代方案的能力被称为反事实思维(CFT),它既涉及情绪调节,也涉及行为调节。精神和神经疾病患者的 CFT 能力受损,这可能导致他们在调节行为和情绪方面存在困难。因此,了解 CFT 损伤的存在及其可能产生的后果,对于优化临床管理可能至关重要。
本综述旨在总结精神和神经疾病患者的 CFT 研究证据,以确定已有研究的广度以及迄今为止的发现,所考虑的各种临床病症,所采用的方法学,以及未来研究需要解决的相关问题。
我们在 PsycInfo、PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 上进行了检索,以确定截至 2020 年 1 月发表的、关注成人精神或神经疾病患者 CFT 的英文文章。
共纳入 29 项研究,其中大多数研究聚焦于精神疾病,少数研究涉及神经疾病。最常用的任务是生成与负面现实生活或虚构事件相关的反事实思维和反事实推理测试。精神和神经疾病患者均存在 CFT 损伤,这可能与额叶执行功能障碍有关。
未来的研究可能会进一步探索那些初步报道存在 CFT 困难的精神和神经疾病患者的 CFT。此外,建议将这一研究扩展到所有可能存在额叶执行功能障碍风险的临床病症。最后,我们推测,由于 CFT 在驱动日常行为方面发挥作用,因此在涉及医疗决策时也可能至关重要;因此,未来的研究可能会特别扩展对那些需要复杂临床管理的人群的 CFT 研究。