Questionnaire Should not Be Used any Longer.
作者信息
Steckelberg Anke, Meyer Gabriele, Mühlhauser Ingrid
出版信息
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 May 5;114(18):330. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0330a.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Questionnaire Should not Be Used any Longer.问卷不应再使用。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 May 5;114(18):330. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0330a.
2
Follow-up by mail in clinical trials: does questionnaire length matter?临床试验中的邮件随访：问卷长度重要吗？
Control Clin Trials. 2004 Feb;25(1):31-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2003.08.013.
3
Standardized Questionnaire Time Burden for Practitioners and Patients.
Surg Technol Int. 2015 May;26:302-6.
4
Surveys and questionnaires in nursing research.护理研究中的调查与问卷。
Nurs Stand. 2015 Jun 17;29(42):42-50. doi: 10.7748/ns.29.42.42.e8904.
5
Comparison of single questions and brief questionnaire with longer validated food frequency questionnaire to assess adequate fruit and vegetable intake.将单个问题及简短问卷与经过验证的较长食物频率问卷进行比较，以评估水果和蔬菜的充足摄入量。
Nutrition. 2015 Jul-Aug;31(7-8):941-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2015.01.006. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
6
Does length of questionnaire matter? A randomised trial of response rates to a mailed questionnaire.问卷长度重要吗？一项关于邮寄问卷回复率的随机试验。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000 Oct;5(4):219-21. doi: 10.1177/135581960000500406.
7
User satisfaction is influenced by the interval between a health care service and the assessment of the service.用户满意度受到医疗服务和服务评估之间间隔的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jun;70(12):1882-1887. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.035. Epub 2010 Mar 18.
8
Questionnaires used to assess barriers of clinical guideline use among physicians are not comprehensive, reliable, or valid: a scoping review.用于评估医生临床指南使用障碍的问卷并不全面、可靠或有效：一项范围综述。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Jun;86:25-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.12.012. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
9
Response burden and questionnaire length: is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis.应答负担和问卷长度：更短是否更好？综述和荟萃分析。
Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):1101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
10
Reducing questionnaire length did not improve physician response rate: a randomized trial.减少问卷长度并未提高医生的回复率：一项随机试验。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;67(4):477-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.09.012. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
引用本文的文献
1
Subjective Health Literacy and Personality in Older Adults: Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, and Openness as Key Predictors-A Cross-Sectional Study.老年人的主观健康素养与人格：尽责性、神经质和开放性作为关键预测因素——一项横断面研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Mar 7;22(3):392. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22030392.
2
Evaluating student's ability to assess treatment claims: validating a German version of the Claim Evaluation Tools.评估学生评估治疗主张的能力：验证主张评估工具的德文版本。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 7;23(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14700-w.
3
Patient satisfaction with computer-assisted structured initial assessment facilitating patient streaming to emergency departments and primary care practices: results from a cross-sectional observational study accompanying the DEMAND intervention in Germany.患者对计算机辅助结构化初始评估促进患者流向急诊科和初级保健实践的满意度：德国 DEMAND 干预伴随的横断面观察性研究结果。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Aug 23;23(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01825-5.
4
Text-Based vs. Graphical Information Formats in Sepsis Prevention and Early Detection: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Informed Choice.脓毒症预防与早期检测中基于文本与图形的信息格式：一项关于知情选择的随机对照试验
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 24;11(13):3659. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133659.
5
[Knowledge facilitates health: the "Fit in Health" program for strengthening the health literacy of students].知识促进健康：“健康融入”项目助力提升学生的健康素养
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Jul;65(7-8):803-813. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03549-4. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
6
Health literacy, health status and health behaviors of German students- study protocol for the "Healthy Habits" cohort study.德国学生的健康素养、健康状况和健康行为——“健康习惯”队列研究的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Aug 6;21(1):1523. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11542-w.
7
Adaptation and qualitative evaluation of Ask 3 Questions - a simple and generic intervention to foster patient empowerment.“Ask 3 Questions”的改编与定性评估——一项促进患者赋权的简单而通用的干预措施。
Health Expect. 2020 Oct;23(5):1310-1325. doi: 10.1111/hex.13114. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
8
Quality of life and fear of disease progression are associated with aspects of health literacy in men with prostate cancer from Germany.生活质量和对疾病进展的恐惧与德国前列腺癌男性健康素养的各个方面有关。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 May;28(5):2283-2292. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05052-0. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
本文引用的文献
1
Health Literacy in the German Population.德国人口的健康素养。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Jan 27;114(4):53-60. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0053.
2
Understanding adverse drug reactions in package leaflets - an exploratory survey among health care professionals.了解药品说明书中的药物不良反应——一项针对医护人员的探索性调查
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Nov 10;15:505. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1160-1.
Zotero 插件