Haarmann Lena, Kalbe Elke, Anapa Görkem, Kurt Dilara, Seven Ümran Sema
Medical Psychology|Neuropsychology and Gender Studies & Center for Neuropsychological Diagnostics and Intervention (CeNDI), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Mar 7;22(3):392. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22030392.
Low health literacy (HL) is associated with numerous negative health behaviors and outcomes, making it crucial to understand its underlying determinants. While associations between sociodemographic variables and subjective HL have already been demonstrated, data on the association between HL and personality remain limited. This study aims to extend the current knowledge by exploring how personality traits influence HL, beyond the effects of sociodemographic variables on HL. A cross-sectional study was performed with a sample of 238 healthy participants aged 50 to 92 years. Personality was measured using the NEO Five-Factor Inventory and subjective health literacy using the HLS-EU-Q47 questionnaire. Descriptive and correlational analyses as well as a multiple linear regression analysis with the Big Five personality traits, sex, age, and education as predictors of subjective health literacy were performed. The General-HL index was 37.22 (SD 7.98), which corresponds to sufficient or non-limited health literacy. The Big Five personality traits accounted for 32.2% of the variance in health literacy. Of the traits, Conscientiousness emerged as the strongest predictor (β = 0.31, medium effect), followed by Neuroticism (β = -0.21, small effect) and Openness to experience (β = 0.15, small effect). Sex was also a significant predictor of health literacy (β = 0.14, small effect). These results suggest that personality plays a significant role in health literacy, with higher Conscientiousness, lower Neuroticism, and higher Openness to experience, as well as female sex, predicting better health literacy. These findings underscore the importance of considering personality traits in interventions aimed at improving health literacy, with potential implications for both theoretical understanding and practical application in healthcare settings.
低健康素养(HL)与众多负面健康行为及结果相关联,因此了解其潜在决定因素至关重要。虽然社会人口统计学变量与主观健康素养之间的关联已得到证实,但关于健康素养与人格之间关联的数据仍然有限。本研究旨在通过探讨人格特质如何影响健康素养,超越社会人口统计学变量对健康素养的影响,来扩展当前的知识。对238名年龄在50至92岁的健康参与者进行了一项横断面研究。使用NEO五因素问卷测量人格,使用HLS-EU-Q47问卷测量主观健康素养。进行了描述性和相关性分析,以及以大五人格特质、性别、年龄和教育作为主观健康素养预测因素的多元线性回归分析。总体健康素养指数为37.22(标准差7.98),这对应于充足或无限制的健康素养。大五人格特质占健康素养方差的32.2%。在这些特质中,尽责性成为最强的预测因素(β = 0.31,中等效应),其次是神经质(β = -0.21,小效应)和开放性体验(β = 0.15,小效应)。性别也是健康素养的一个重要预测因素(β = 0.14,小效应)。这些结果表明,人格在健康素养中起着重要作用,较高的尽责性、较低的神经质、较高的开放性体验以及女性性别预示着更好的健康素养。这些发现强调了在旨在提高健康素养的干预措施中考虑人格特质的重要性,对医疗环境中的理论理解和实际应用都有潜在影响。