Suppr超能文献

了解药品说明书中的药物不良反应——一项针对医护人员的探索性调查

Understanding adverse drug reactions in package leaflets - an exploratory survey among health care professionals.

作者信息

Mühlbauer Viktoria, Mühlhauser Ingrid

机构信息

University of Hamburg, MIN Faculty, Health Sciences and Education, Martin-Luther-King Platz 6, D-20146, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Nov 10;15:505. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1160-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current German or UK package leaflets do not contain an explicit notice that the listing of side effects does not imply that they are caused by the drug. Causal interpretations by patients and lay people are frequently observed. The authors examined whether health professionals understand that there is not necessarily a causal relation between drug intake and the frequency of side effects and whether adding placebo comparison improves understanding.

METHODS

Exploratory survey consisting of eight assessments, each containing 2-6 survey items, and focus groups with one survey sample using questionnaires on adverse reactions in standard package leaflets and modified package leaflets supplemented with placebo comparison. Participants were convenience samples of 379 health professionals including 153 physicians (80 gynaecologists, 124 diabetes experts - physicians, nurses, and others, 39 medical students in their last year at university, 49 first year health science and education students with completed vocational training and professional experience in various health care professions and 87 pharmacists/pharmacy students). They were asked to rate how often the different adverse reactions listed were caused by drug intake. All surveys were carried out within university seminars and postgraduate lectures from April 2014 to June 2015 in Germany. Response rate was 86 % or higher.

RESULTS

Without placebo comparison, the majority of participants responded that the drug causes adverse reactions with the frequency given in the package leaflet or even more often (95 % of health science students, 100 % of medical students, 60 to 80 % of physicians and 66 % of pharmacists/pharmacy students). Simply adding placebo comparison in a table did not prevent misunderstanding. Analysis of focus groups with health science students supported the lack of understanding.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present surveys, health professionals had major difficulties understanding frequency information on side effects in package leaflets. The great majority erroneously implied a causal relation between drug intake and the frequency of side effects, even though most side effects listed are symptoms commonly experienced in daily life.

摘要

背景

目前德国或英国的药品说明书中并未明确指出,列出副作用并不意味着它们是由药物引起的。患者和普通民众经常会进行因果关系的解读。作者研究了医疗专业人员是否理解药物摄入与副作用发生频率之间不一定存在因果关系,以及添加安慰剂对照是否能增进理解。

方法

进行了一项探索性调查,包括八项评估,每项评估包含2至6个调查项目,并对一个调查样本进行焦点小组访谈,使用关于标准药品说明书和补充了安慰剂对照的修改版药品说明书中不良反应的问卷。参与者是379名医疗专业人员的便利样本,包括153名医生(80名妇科医生、124名糖尿病专家——医生、护士及其他人员)、39名大学最后一年的医学生、49名完成职业培训并具有各种医疗保健职业专业经验的健康科学与教育专业一年级学生以及87名药剂师/药学专业学生。他们被要求对列出的不同不良反应由药物摄入引起的频率进行评分。所有调查于2014年4月至2015年6月在德国的大学研讨会和研究生讲座中进行。回复率为86%或更高。

结果

在没有安慰剂对照的情况下,大多数参与者回答药物会导致药品说明书中给出频率的不良反应,甚至更频繁(95%的健康科学专业学生、100%的医学生、60%至80%的医生以及66%的药剂师/药学专业学生)。仅仅在表格中添加安慰剂对照并不能防止误解。对健康科学专业学生的焦点小组分析证实了这种理解不足。

结论

在本次调查中,医疗专业人员在理解药品说明书中副作用的频率信息方面存在重大困难。绝大多数人错误地暗示了药物摄入与副作用发生频率之间存在因果关系,尽管列出的大多数副作用是日常生活中常见的症状。

相似文献

10
Readability of medicinal package leaflets: a systematic review.药品说明书的可读性:一项系统综述。
Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49:4. doi: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2015049005559. Epub 2015 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

3
Physicians' use of and preferences for FDA-approved prescribing information.医生对 FDA 批准的处方信息的使用和偏好。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Jun;18(6):3027-3037. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.07.028. Epub 2021 Aug 1.
5
In Reply.作为回复。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018 Sep 21;115(38):637. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0637.
7
Questionnaire Should not Be Used any Longer.问卷不应再使用。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 May 5;114(18):330. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0330a.

本文引用的文献

6
Combination contraceptives: effects on weight.复方避孕药:对体重的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 29;2014(1):CD003987. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003987.pub5.
9
Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.他汀类药物用于心血管疾病的一级预防。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;2013(1):CD004816. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004816.pub5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验