Kinshasa School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).
Ministry of Public Health, Kinshasa, DRC.
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017 Jun 27;5(2):274-285. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00205.
To determine the availability and quality of family planning services within health facilities throughout the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).
Data were collected for the cross-sectional study from April 2014 to June 2014 by the Ministry of Public Health. A total of 1,568 health facilities that reported data to the National Health Information System were selected by multistage random sampling in the 11 provinces of the DRC existing at that time. Data were collected through interviews, document review, and direct observation. Two dependent variables were measured: availability of family planning services (consisting of a room for services, staff assigned to family planning, and evidence of client use of family planning) and quality of family planning services (assessed as "high" if the facility had at least 1 trained staff member, family planning service delivery guidelines, at least 3 types of methods, and a sphygmomanometer, or "low" if the facility did not meet any of these 4 criteria). Pearson's chi-square test and odds ratios (ORs) were used to test for significant associations, using the alpha significance level of .05.
We successfully surveyed 1,555 facilities (99.2%) of those included in the sample. One in every 3 facilities (33%) offered family planning services as assessed by the index of availability, of which 20% met all 4 criteria for providing high-quality services. Availability was greatest at the highest level of the health system (hospitals) and decreased incrementally with each health system level, with disparities between provinces and urban and rural areas. Facilities in urban areas were more likely than in rural areas to meet the standard for high-quality services (<.001). Public facilities were less likely than private facilities to have high-quality services (=.02). Among all 1,555 facilities surveyed, 14% had at least 3 types of methods available at the time of the survey; the most widely available methods were male condoms, combined oral contraceptive pills, and progestin-only injectable contraceptives.
Availability and quality of family planning services in health facilities in the DRC remain low, with inequitable distribution of services throughout the country. To improve access to and use of family planning, efforts should focus on improving availability and quality at lower health system levels and in rural areas where the majority of the population lives.
确定刚果民主共和国(刚果(金))各卫生机构提供计划生育服务的可及性和质量。
本横断面研究的数据于 2014 年 4 月至 6 月间由刚果(金)公共卫生部收集。当时,在刚果(金)11 个省份采用多阶段随机抽样的方法,选择了向国家卫生信息系统报告数据的 1568 个卫生机构。通过访谈、文件审查和直接观察收集数据。测量了两个因变量:计划生育服务的可及性(包括服务室、计划生育分配人员以及客户使用计划生育的证据)和计划生育服务的质量(如果设施至少有 1 名经过培训的工作人员、计划生育服务提供指南、至少 3 种方法和血压计,则评估为“高”,如果设施不符合这 4 个标准中的任何一个,则评估为“低”)。使用 Pearson's chi-square 检验和比值比(OR)检验有显著关联,α 显著性水平为.05。
我们成功调查了抽样中包含的 1555 个设施中的 1555 个设施(99.2%)。按可及性指数评估,每 3 个设施中就有 1 个提供计划生育服务,其中 20%符合提供高质量服务的全部 4 个标准。服务的可及性在卫生系统的最高级别(医院)最高,并且随着卫生系统级别的逐步降低而逐渐降低,省与省之间以及城乡之间存在差异。城市地区的设施比农村地区更有可能符合高质量服务的标准(<.001)。公立设施比私立设施提供高质量服务的可能性更小(=.02)。在所调查的 1555 个设施中,14%在调查时至少有 3 种方法可用;最广泛使用的方法是男用避孕套、复方口服避孕药和单纯孕激素避孕针。
刚果(金)卫生机构提供计划生育服务的可及性和质量仍然很低,全国服务分布不均。为了增加计划生育服务的可及性和使用率,应重点改善较低卫生系统级别的服务可及性和质量,并改善农村地区的服务,因为大多数人口居住在农村地区。