• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

富豪特权方案:富裕患者付费参与临床试验的伦理途径

A Plutocratic Proposal: an ethical way for rich patients to pay for a place on a clinical trial.

机构信息

Freelance/No affiliation.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2017 Nov;43(11):730-736. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-104050. Epub 2017 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2016-104050
PMID:28588147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5749301/
Abstract

Many potential therapeutic agents are discarded before they are tested in humans. These are not quack medications. They are drugs and other interventions that have been developed by responsible scientists in respectable companies or universities and are often backed up by publications in peer-reviewed journals. These possible treatments might ease suffering and prolong the lives of innumerable patients, yet they have been put aside. In this paper, we outline a novel mechanism-the Plutocratic Proposal-to revive such neglected research and fund early phase clinical trials. The central idea of the Proposal is that any patient who rescues a potential therapeutic agent from neglect by funding early phase clinical trials (either entirely or in large part) should be offered a place on the trial.

摘要

许多潜在的治疗药物在进行人体试验之前就被淘汰了。这些不是庸医的药物。它们是由负责任的科学家在有信誉的公司或大学开发的药物和其他干预措施,并且通常有同行评议期刊的出版物支持。这些可能的治疗方法可以减轻无数患者的痛苦并延长他们的生命,但它们被搁置了。在本文中,我们概述了一种新颖的机制——富豪提案——来恢复这种被忽视的研究并为早期临床试验提供资金。该提案的核心思想是,任何通过为早期临床试验提供资金(全部或大部分)来挽救潜在治疗药物的患者都应该获得试验的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af43/5749301/31fcf2c9ca49/medethics-2016-104050f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af43/5749301/31fcf2c9ca49/medethics-2016-104050f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af43/5749301/31fcf2c9ca49/medethics-2016-104050f01.jpg

相似文献

1
A Plutocratic Proposal: an ethical way for rich patients to pay for a place on a clinical trial.富豪特权方案:富裕患者付费参与临床试验的伦理途径
J Med Ethics. 2017 Nov;43(11):730-736. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-104050. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
2
Donor-funded research: permissible, not perfect.捐赠研究:允许,但不完美。
J Med Ethics. 2019 Jan;45(1):36-40. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-104966. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
3
Acceptability of donor funding for clinical trials in the UK: a qualitative empirical ethics study using focus groups to elicit the views of research patient public involvement group members, research ethics committee chairs and clinical researchers.英国临床试验中接受捐赠资金的可接受性:一项定性实证伦理研究,使用焦点小组来引出研究患者公众参与小组成员、研究伦理委员会主席和临床研究人员的观点。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 17;12(6):e055208. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055208.
4
Putting the "ethics" into "research ethics".将“伦理”融入“研究伦理”。
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Winter;5(1):51-3; author reply W15-8. doi: 10.1080/15265160590927822.
5
Independent medical research.独立医学研究。
Neth J Med. 2007 Apr;65(4):124-6.
6
Participant-funded clinical trials on rare diseases.罕见病患者主导的临床试验。
An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2020 Oct;93(4):267.e1-267.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.anpede.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
7
[Participant-funded clinical trials on rare diseases].[罕见病的受试者资助临床试验]
An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2020 Oct;93(4):267.e1-267.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2020.03.019. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
8
Why adopt a maximin theory of exploitation?为什么要采用剥削的极大极小理论?
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jun;10(6):38-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.482635.
9
Fair benefits in developing countries: maximin as a good start.发展中国家的公平利益:最大最小值原则是一个良好的开端。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jun;10(6):36-7. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.482648.
10
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients' Views on Paying to Participate in Clinical Trials.患者对支付参与临床试验费用的看法。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2025 Jul 3:1-8. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2025.2526325.
2
Acceptability of donor funding for clinical trials in the UK: a qualitative empirical ethics study using focus groups to elicit the views of research patient public involvement group members, research ethics committee chairs and clinical researchers.英国临床试验中接受捐赠资金的可接受性:一项定性实证伦理研究,使用焦点小组来引出研究患者公众参与小组成员、研究伦理委员会主席和临床研究人员的观点。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 17;12(6):e055208. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055208.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Can you teach old drugs new tricks?老药能否有新用?
Nature. 2016 Jun 16;534(7607):314-6. doi: 10.1038/534314a.
2
Clinical research: Should patients pay to play?临床研究:患者应该付费参与吗?
Sci Transl Med. 2015 Jul 29;7(298):298ps16. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aac5204.
3
Exploring the rising incidence of neuroendocrine tumors: a population-based analysis of epidemiology, metastatic presentation, and outcomes.探讨神经内分泌肿瘤发病率的上升:基于人群的流行病学、转移表现和结局分析。
A systematic literature review to identify ethical, legal, and social responsibilities of nonprofit organizations when funding clinical trials in pediatric cancer.
系统文献回顾,以确定非营利组织在资助儿科癌症临床试验时的伦理、法律和社会责任。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022 Sep;69(9):e29854. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29854. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
Cancer. 2015 Feb 15;121(4):589-97. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29099. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
4
Clinical development success rates for investigational drugs.研究性药物的临床开发成功率。
Nat Biotechnol. 2014 Jan;32(1):40-51. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2786.
5
Practical aspects of recruitment and retention in clinical trials of rare genetic diseases: the phenylketonuria (PKU) experience.罕见遗传病临床试验中招募和留住参与者的实际问题:苯丙酮尿症(PKU)的经验
J Genet Couns. 2014 Feb;23(1):20-8. doi: 10.1007/s10897-013-9642-y. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
6
The Valley of Death in anticancer drug development: a reassessment.抗癌药物研发中的“死亡谷”:再评估。
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2012 Apr;33(4):173-80. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Mar 10.
7
Adenovirus with hexon Tat-protein transduction domain modification exhibits increased therapeutic effect in experimental neuroblastoma and neuroendocrine tumors.六邻体 Tat 蛋白转导结构域修饰的腺病毒在实验性神经母细胞瘤和神经内分泌肿瘤中表现出增强的治疗效果。
J Virol. 2011 Dec;85(24):13114-23. doi: 10.1128/JVI.05759-11. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
8
Oncolytic adenovirus modified with somatostatin motifs for selective infection of neuroendocrine tumor cells.携带生长抑素基序的溶瘤腺病毒,用于选择性感染神经内分泌肿瘤细胞。
Gene Ther. 2011 Nov;18(11):1052-62. doi: 10.1038/gt.2011.54. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
9
Double-detargeted oncolytic adenovirus shows replication arrest in liver cells and retains neuroendocrine cell killing ability.双重靶向溶瘤腺病毒在肝细胞中显示复制停滞,同时保留对神经内分泌细胞的杀伤能力。
PLoS One. 2010 Jan 27;5(1):e8916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008916.
10
Translational research: crossing the valley of death.转化医学研究:跨越死亡谷。
Nature. 2008 Jun 12;453(7197):840-2. doi: 10.1038/453840a.