Suppr超能文献

子宫切除术后定期预防性止痛与按需治疗的比较。

Regular interval preventive pain relief compared with on demand treatment after hysterectomy.

作者信息

Jørgensen Bent Chræmmer, Schmidt Jes F, Risbo Allan, Pedersen Jan, Kolby Peter

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup Hospital, DK-2600 GlostrupDenmark.

出版信息

Pain. 1985 Feb;21(2):137-142. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(85)90283-0.

Abstract

Eighty otherwise healthy women, aged 22-64 years, admitted for elective hysterectomy were studied in a prospective randomized trial. The aim was to compare two different postoperative pain relief schedules--one with the analgesic given at regular intervals and the other with the analgesic given on demand. All the patients had a neuroleptanaesthesia with fentanyl. Forty patients received an initial dose of buprenorphine 0.3 mg intravenously before termination of anaesthesia and continued with sublingual buprenorphine 0.4 mg 6 hourly postoperatively (regular interval (RI) group). Forty patients received the standard postoperative medication, meperidine 1 mg/kg on demand in the recovery room, followed by ketobemidone 5 mg subcutaneously on demand in the surgical ward (on demand (OD) group). There was no difference between groups concerning pain relief following a single dose of analgesic (P greater than 0.05, type II error 1-5%). In the recovery room 17.5% of the patients in the RI group received an analgesic compared to 87.5% in the OD group (P less than 0.05). Among patients in the RI group who had previously got injections for postoperative pain relief on demand 95% preferred regular interval sublingual buprenorphine for future treatment. The nurses found that 90% of the patients in the RI group were treated adequately compared to 62.5% of the patients in the OD group (P less than 0.05). It is concluded, that regular interval preventive pain relief is superior to conventional on demand analgesic therapy in postoperative pain.

摘要

在一项前瞻性随机试验中,对80名年龄在22至64岁、因择期子宫切除术入院的健康女性进行了研究。目的是比较两种不同的术后疼痛缓解方案——一种是定期给予镇痛药,另一种是按需给予镇痛药。所有患者均采用芬太尼神经安定麻醉。40名患者在麻醉结束前静脉注射初始剂量的丁丙诺啡0.3mg,术后每6小时舌下含服丁丙诺啡0.4mg(定期给药(RI)组)。40名患者接受标准的术后药物治疗,在恢复室按需给予哌替啶1mg/kg,随后在外科病房按需皮下注射凯托米酮5mg(按需给药(OD)组)。单剂量镇痛药后的疼痛缓解在两组之间没有差异(P>0.05,II类错误1-5%)。在恢复室,RI组17.5%的患者接受了镇痛药,而OD组为87.5%(P<0.05)。在RI组中,之前曾按需注射术后镇痛药的患者中,95%的患者更倾向于未来采用定期舌下含服丁丙诺啡进行治疗。护士发现,RI组90%的患者得到了充分治疗,而OD组为62.5%(P<0.05)。得出的结论是,在术后疼痛中,定期预防性疼痛缓解优于传统的按需镇痛治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验