• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哪些患者在他们偏好的地点去世?对失去亲人的亲属问卷调查数据的二次分析。

Which patients die in their preferred place? A secondary analysis of questionnaire data from bereaved relatives.

机构信息

1 Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.

2 Comprehensive Cancer Center the Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;32(2):347-356. doi: 10.1177/0269216317710383. Epub 2017 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1177/0269216317710383
PMID:28590159
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies on factors influencing the place of death have focused on cancer patients dying at home. However, home is not always the preferred place.

AIM

To provide insight into the extent to which patients with various diseases die in their preferred place and into factors associated with dying in the preferred place.

DESIGN

A secondary analysis of the data set of the evaluation study of the National Quality Improvement Programme for Palliative Care was undertaken to explore factors related to 'dying in the preferred place'.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 797 bereaved relatives filled in the Consumer Quality Index Palliative Care, a validated and reliable questionnaire.

RESULTS

Two-thirds of the patients died in the preferred place. A preference for dying at home and having had a stroke decreased the likelihood of dying in the preferred place, while having a partner, dementia, contact with the general practitioner in the last week before death, and continuity of care between professionals increased the likelihood of dying in the preferred place. Furthermore, people who wanted to die at home and also had dementia were more likely to die elsewhere than people without dementia who wanted to die at home.

CONCLUSION

Positive associations were found between continuity of care between healthcare professionals and contact with the general practitioner and the chance of people dying in their preferred place. Moreover, special attention for people who have had a stroke and for people with dementia who want to die at home seems indicated as their diagnosis is negatively associated with dying in their preferred place.

摘要

背景

先前关于影响死亡地点的因素的研究主要集中在癌症患者在家中死亡的情况。然而,家并不总是首选的地点。

目的

深入了解患有各种疾病的患者在其首选地点死亡的程度,以及与在首选地点死亡相关的因素。

设计

对姑息治疗国家质量改进计划评估研究数据集进行二次分析,以探讨与“在首选地点死亡”相关的因素。

设置/参与者:共有 797 名失去亲人的亲属填写了消费者质量指数姑息护理调查问卷,该问卷经过验证和可靠。

结果

三分之二的患者在首选地点死亡。在家中死亡的偏好和中风降低了在首选地点死亡的可能性,而有伴侣、痴呆症、在死亡前一周与全科医生的接触以及专业人员之间的护理连续性则增加了在首选地点死亡的可能性。此外,那些希望在家中死亡且患有痴呆症的人比那些希望在家中死亡但没有痴呆症的人更有可能在其他地方死亡。

结论

医疗保健专业人员之间的护理连续性以及与全科医生的接触与人们在首选地点死亡的机会之间存在正相关关系。此外,对于患有中风的人和希望在家中死亡的痴呆症患者,似乎需要特别关注,因为他们的诊断与在首选地点死亡呈负相关。

相似文献

1
Which patients die in their preferred place? A secondary analysis of questionnaire data from bereaved relatives.哪些患者在他们偏好的地点去世?对失去亲人的亲属问卷调查数据的二次分析。
Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;32(2):347-356. doi: 10.1177/0269216317710383. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
2
Dying at home or in an institution: perspectives of Dutch physicians and bereaved relatives.在家中或机构中离世:荷兰医生和丧亲亲属的观点。
Support Care Cancer. 2007 Dec;15(12):1413-21. doi: 10.1007/s00520-007-0254-7. Epub 2007 Apr 20.
3
Variations in the quality and costs of end-of-life care, preferences and palliative outcomes for cancer patients by place of death: the QUALYCARE study.癌症患者临终关怀的质量和费用、偏好以及姑息治疗结局的差异,与死亡地点有关:QUALYCARE 研究。
BMC Cancer. 2010 Aug 2;10:400. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-400.
4
End-of-life care and achieving preferences for place of death in England: results of a population-based survey using the VOICES-SF questionnaire.英国的临终关怀与实现死亡地点偏好:使用VOICES-SF问卷进行的基于人群调查结果
Palliat Med. 2014 May;28(5):412-21. doi: 10.1177/0269216313512012. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
5
[Dying in Rhineland-Palatinate (Germany): preferred and actual place of death].[在莱茵兰-普法尔茨州(德国)死亡:首选和实际死亡地点]
Gesundheitswesen. 2013 Dec;75(12):853-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1333740. Epub 2013 May 28.
6
Social and clinical determinants of preferences and their achievement at the end of life: prospective cohort study of older adults receiving palliative care in three countries.社会和临床决定因素对生命终末期偏好及其实现的影响:对三个国家接受姑息治疗的老年患者的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Nov 23;17(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0648-4.
7
Relatives' perceived quality of palliative care: comparisons between care settings in which patients die.临终关怀的亲属感知质量:不同临终关怀环境的比较。
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Aug 16;16(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0224-x.
8
Is dying in hospital better than home in incurable cancer and what factors influence this? A population-based study.在患有无法治愈的癌症时,在医院死亡比在家中死亡更好吗?哪些因素会对此产生影响?一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 9;13:235. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0466-5.
9
Place of death and the differences in patient quality of death and dying and caregiver burden.死亡地点与患者死亡质量和临终关怀差异以及照顾者负担。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb 1;33(4):357-63. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.7355. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
10
The complex relationship between household income of family caregivers, access to palliative care services and place of death: A national household population survey.照料者家庭收入、姑息治疗服务获取途径和死亡地点之间的复杂关系:全国家庭人口调查。
Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;32(2):357-365. doi: 10.1177/0269216317711825. Epub 2017 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Reasons for and Congruence Between Preferred and Actual Place of Death Among Cancer Patients Receiving End-of-Life Care: A Cross-Cultural Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study in East Asia.接受临终关怀的癌症患者首选死亡地点与实际死亡地点之间的原因及一致性:东亚的一项跨文化多中心前瞻性队列研究
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 20;17(13):2062. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132062.
2
Development of specialist palliative care in Dutch hospitals between 2014 and 2020: a repeated survey.2014年至2020年荷兰医院专科姑息治疗的发展:一项重复调查。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jan 23;24(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01657-x.
3
Inpatient Neurology Deaths and Factors Associated With Discharge to Hospice.
住院神经内科患者的死亡情况及与临终关怀出院相关的因素。
Neurohospitalist. 2023 Oct;13(4):337-344. doi: 10.1177/19418744231174577. Epub 2023 May 10.
4
Levels and Determinants of Place-Of-Death Congruence in Palliative Patients: A Systematic Review.姑息治疗患者死亡地点一致性的水平及决定因素:一项系统综述
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 13;12:807869. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.807869. eCollection 2021.
5
Palliative care after stroke: A review.脑卒中后姑息治疗:综述。
Int J Stroke. 2021 Aug;16(6):632-639. doi: 10.1177/17474930211016603. Epub 2021 May 17.
6
Experiences of family caregivers of patients with terminal disease and the quality of end-of-life care received: a mixed methods study.晚期疾病患者家庭照顾者的经历及所接受的临终关怀质量:一项混合方法研究。
PeerJ. 2020 Dec 14;8:e10516. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10516. eCollection 2020.
7
Integrating Palliative Care by Virtue of Diplomacy; A Cross-sectional Group Interview Study of the Roles and Attitudes of Palliative Care Professionals to Further Integrate Palliative Care in Europe.通过外交手段整合姑息治疗;姑息治疗专业人员在进一步整合欧洲姑息治疗中的作用和态度的跨部门小组访谈研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Jun 1;11(6):786-794. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.211.
8
Dementia Care at End of Life: Current Approaches.生命终末期的痴呆症护理:当前方法。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018 Jun 23;20(7):50. doi: 10.1007/s11920-018-0915-x.