Xu Y, Xu C, Xu S
Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.
Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Key Laboratory of Plant Functional Genomics of Ministry of Education, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Heredity (Edinb). 2017 Sep;119(3):174-184. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2017.27. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
Genomic selection holds a great promise to accelerate plant breeding via early selection before phenotypes are measured, and it offers major advantages over marker-assisted selection for highly polygenic traits. In addition to genomic data, metabolome and transcriptome are increasingly receiving attention as new data sources for phenotype prediction. We used data available from maize as a model to compare the predictive abilities of three different omic data sources using eight representative methods for six traits. We found that the best linear unbiased prediction overall performs better than other methods across different traits and different omic data, and genomic prediction performs better than transcriptomic and metabolomic predictions. For the same maize data, we also conducted genome-wide association study, transcriptome-wide association studies and metabolome-wide association studies for the six agronomic traits using both the genome-wide efficient mixed model association (GEMMA) method and a modified least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method. The new LASSO method has the ability to perform statistical tests. Simulation studies show that the modified LASSO performs better than GEMMA in terms of high power and low Type 1 error.
基因组选择有望通过在测量表型之前进行早期选择来加速植物育种,并且对于高度多基因性状而言,它比标记辅助选择具有显著优势。除了基因组数据外,代谢组和转录组作为表型预测的新数据源也越来越受到关注。我们以玉米数据为模型,使用八种代表性方法对六个性状比较了三种不同组学数据源的预测能力。我们发现,总体上最佳线性无偏预测在不同性状和不同组学数据中表现优于其他方法,并且基因组预测比转录组和代谢组预测表现更好。对于相同的玉米数据,我们还使用全基因组高效混合模型关联(GEMMA)方法和改进的最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)方法,对六个农艺性状进行了全基因组关联研究、转录组全关联研究和代谢组全关联研究。新的LASSO方法具有进行统计检验的能力。模拟研究表明,改进的LASSO在高功效和低一类错误方面比GEMMA表现更好。