Port M, Pieper B, Knie T, Dörr H, Ganser A, Graessle D, Meineke V, Abend M
a Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, Munich, Germany.
b Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Germany.
Radiat Res. 2017 Aug;188(2):156-168. doi: 10.1667/RR14612.1. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
Rapid clinical triage of radiation injury patients is essential for determining appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. We examined the utility of blood cell counts (BCCs) in the first three days postirradiation to predict clinical outcome, specifically for hematologic acute radiation syndrome (HARS). We analyzed BCC test samples from radiation accident victims (n = 135) along with their clinical outcome HARS severity scores (H1-4) using the System for Evaluation and Archiving of Radiation Accidents based on Case Histories (SEARCH) database. Data from nonirradiated individuals (H0, n = 132) were collected from an outpatient facility. We created binary categories for severity scores, i.e., 1 (H0 vs. H1-4), 2 (H0-1 vs. H2-4) and 3 (H0-2 vs. H3-4), to assess the discrimination ability of BCCs using unconditional logistic regression analysis. The test sample contained 454 BCCs from 267 individuals. We validated the discrimination ability on a second independent group comprised of 275 BCCs from 252 individuals originating from SEARCH (HARS 1-4), an outpatient facility (H0) and hospitals (e.g., leukemia patients, H4). Individuals with a score of H0 were easily separated from exposed individuals based on developing lymphopenia and granulocytosis. The separation of H0 and H1-4 became more prominent with increasing hematologic severity scores and time. On day 1, lymphocyte counts were most predictive for discriminating binary categories, followed by granulocytes and thrombocytes. For days 2 and 3, an almost complete separation was achieved when BCCs from different days were combined, supporting the measurement of sequential BCC. We found an almost complete discrimination of H0 vs. irradiated individuals during model validation (negative predictive value, NPV > 94%) for all three days, while the correct prediction of exposed individuals increased from day 1 (positive predictive value, PPV 78-89%) to day 3 (PPV > 90%). The models were unable to provide predictions for 10.9% of the test samples, because the PPVs or NPVs did not reach a 95% likelihood defined as the lower limit for a prediction. We developed a prediction model spreadsheet to provide early and prompt diagnostic predictions and therapeutic recommendations including identification of the worried well, requirement of hospitalization or development of severe hematopoietic syndrome. These results improve the provisional classification of HARS. For the final diagnosis, further procedures (sequential diagnosis, retrospective dosimetry, clinical follow-up, etc.) must be taken into account. Clinical outcome of radiation injury patients can be rapidly predicted within the first three days postirradiation using peripheral BCC.
对辐射损伤患者进行快速临床分诊对于确定适当的诊断和治疗干预措施至关重要。我们研究了辐射后前三天血细胞计数(BCC)在预测临床结果方面的效用,特别是针对血液学急性辐射综合征(HARS)。我们使用基于病例历史的辐射事故评估和存档系统(SEARCH)数据库,分析了辐射事故受害者(n = 135)的BCC测试样本及其临床结果HARS严重程度评分(H1 - 4)。来自非辐射个体(H0,n = 132)的数据是从门诊机构收集的。我们为严重程度评分创建了二元类别,即1(H0与H1 - 4)、2(H0 - 1与H2 - 4)和3(H0 - 2与H3 - 4),以使用无条件逻辑回归分析评估BCC的辨别能力。测试样本包含来自267名个体的454个BCC。我们在第二个独立组上验证了辨别能力,该组由来自SEARCH(HARS 1 - 4)、门诊机构(H0)和医院(如白血病患者,H4)的252名个体的275个BCC组成。根据淋巴细胞减少和粒细胞增多情况,H0评分的个体很容易与受照射个体区分开来。随着血液学严重程度评分和时间的增加,H0和H1 - 4的区分变得更加明显。在第1天,淋巴细胞计数对于区分二元类别最具预测性,其次是粒细胞和血小板。在第2天和第3天,当合并不同日期的BCC时,几乎实现了完全分离,这支持了连续BCC的测量。我们发现在模型验证期间,对于所有三天,H0与受照射个体之间几乎完全区分(阴性预测值,NPV > 94%),而对受照射个体的正确预测从第1天(阳性预测值,PPV 78 - 89%)增加到第3天(PPV > 90%)。由于PPV或NPV未达到定义为预测下限的95%可能性,模型无法对10.9%的测试样本进行预测。我们开发了一个预测模型电子表格,以提供早期和及时的诊断预测以及治疗建议,包括识别担忧健康者、住院需求或严重造血综合征的发展。这些结果改善了HARS的临时分类。对于最终诊断,必须考虑进一步的程序(连续诊断、回顾性剂量测定、临床随访等)。使用外周BCC可在辐射后前三天快速预测辐射损伤患者的临床结果。