Suppr超能文献

关节内胸椎关节突关节类固醇注射与胸椎内侧支阻滞治疗胸椎关节突关节痛的比较。

Comparison of Intra-articular Thoracic Facet Joint Steroid Injection and Thoracic Medial Branch Block for the Management of Thoracic Facet Joint Pain.

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University.

Dr Ahn's Spine and Pain Clinic, and Dr Ahn's Spine and Pain Institute, Daegu.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Jan 15;43(2):76-80. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002269.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to show the effect of intra-articular (IA) thoracic facet joint (TFJ) steroid injection for the management of TFJ pain, and to compare it with the effect of therapeutic thoracic medial branch block (MBB) with a local anesthetic and steroid.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Several studies have shown the effects of thoracic MBB with local anesthetics with or without steroids and radiofrequency neurotomy in managing TFJ pain, but thus far, the effectiveness of IA TFJ steroid injection has not been studied.

METHODS

Forty patients with TFJ pain were recruited and randomly assigned to one of two groups, the IA steroid injection and the MBB group, each with 20 patients. For IA TFJ steroid injection and therapeutic MBB, we injected 0.5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine, mixed with 10 mg (0.25 mL) of dexamethasone. We assessed the severity of TFJ pain using a numeric rating scale (NRS) before treatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment.

RESULTS

Compared to the pretreatment NRS scores, the NRS scores at 1, 3, and 6 months after each treatment showed a significant decrease in patients in both the groups. Intergroup changes in the NRS scores were not significantly different over time. Six months after the treatment, 65% of the patients in the IA steroid injection group reported successful pain relief (pain relief ≥50%), and 40% of the patients in the MBB group showed successful pain relief.

CONCLUSION

In the present study, both IA TFJ steroid injection and therapeutic MBB significantly relieved TFJ pain. Their effects persisted for at least 6 months after the procedure. Thus, we think that both IA TFJ steroid injection and therapeutic thoracic MBB are useful treatment options for managing TFJ pain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

摘要

研究设计

一项前瞻性观察研究。

目的

本研究旨在展示关节内(IA)胸椎关节突关节(TFJ)类固醇注射治疗 TFJ 疼痛的效果,并将其与局部麻醉和类固醇的治疗性胸椎内侧支阻滞(MBB)进行比较。

背景资料概要

多项研究表明,胸椎 MBB 联合局部麻醉剂、类固醇和射频神经切断术在治疗 TFJ 疼痛方面具有疗效,但迄今为止,IA TFJ 类固醇注射的有效性尚未得到研究。

方法

共招募了 40 名 TFJ 疼痛患者,并随机分为 IA 类固醇注射组和 MBB 组,每组 20 名患者。IA TFJ 类固醇注射和治疗性 MBB 均注射 0.5mL 0.5%布比卡因,混合 10mg(0.25mL)地塞米松。在治疗前和治疗后 1、3 和 6 个月使用数字评分量表(NRS)评估 TFJ 疼痛的严重程度。

结果

与治疗前 NRS 评分相比,两组患者在治疗后 1、3 和 6 个月的 NRS 评分均显著下降。两组患者 NRS 评分的组间变化在不同时间点均无显著差异。治疗后 6 个月,IA 类固醇注射组 65%的患者报告疼痛缓解(疼痛缓解≥50%),MBB 组 40%的患者疼痛缓解。

结论

在本研究中,IA TFJ 类固醇注射和治疗性 MBB 均显著缓解了 TFJ 疼痛。它们的效果至少在治疗后 6 个月内持续存在。因此,我们认为 IA TFJ 类固醇注射和治疗性胸椎 MBB 都是治疗 TFJ 疼痛的有效选择。

证据水平

2 级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验