• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[玻利维亚洛斯安第斯地区网络中卫生工作者对孕妇梅毒筛查的障碍]

[Health-worker barriers to syphilis screening in pregnant women in Bolivia's Los Andes network].

作者信息

Tinajeros Freddy, Ares Lucila Rey, Elías Vanessa, Reveiz Ludovic, Sánchez Franz, Mejía Martha, Hernández Rosalinda, Revollo Rita

机构信息

Consultor independiente, Bolivia.

Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2017 May 25;41:e21. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2017.21.

DOI:10.26633/RPSP.2017.21
PMID:28591328
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6660890/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Identify health-worker barriers that keep pregnant women who receive prenatal care from being screened for syphilis (Los Andes Health Network, Bolivia).

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were done with 46 health care providers and 249 clinical health records of pregnant women were analyzed in eight public health facilities in the Los Andes network.

RESULTS

Health-worker barriers to syphilis screening in pregnant women included lack of time by personnel to raise awareness of the benefit of syphilis screening; some mentioned that syphilis tests should only be done in facilities that attend deliveries and have a laboratory; lack of communication between clinicians and laboratory personnel; and problems with provision of supplies and reagents. The clinical record review found that only 55.4% contained syphilis laboratory results and only 37.4% of perinatal clinical histories had records of laboratory results. The interviews found that providers believe that syphilis screening is done in 100% of pregnant women receiving prenatal care.

CONCLUSION

Syphilis screening is not being done according to Bolivia's strategy for the elimination of congenital syphilis, and is not done on more than half of pregnant women in prenatal care with perinatal clinical history records. This is not perceived by health professionals and can become a barrier to syphilis screening in pregnant women.

摘要

目的

确定导致接受产前护理的孕妇未接受梅毒筛查的卫生工作者方面的障碍(玻利维亚洛斯安第斯卫生网络)。

方法

对46名医疗服务提供者进行了半结构化访谈,并分析了洛斯安第斯网络中8家公共卫生机构的249份孕妇临床健康记录。

结果

卫生工作者在孕妇梅毒筛查方面的障碍包括:工作人员缺乏时间来提高对梅毒筛查益处的认识;一些人提到梅毒检测应仅在有接生服务且设有实验室的机构进行;临床医生与实验室人员之间缺乏沟通;以及供应品和试剂的提供存在问题。临床记录审查发现,只有55.4%的记录包含梅毒实验室检测结果,只有37.4%的围产期临床病史有实验室检测结果记录。访谈发现,医疗服务提供者认为接受产前护理的孕妇中有100%进行了梅毒筛查。

结论

梅毒筛查未按照玻利维亚消除先天性梅毒的战略进行,在有围产期临床病史记录的产前护理孕妇中,超过一半未进行筛查。卫生专业人员并未意识到这一点,这可能成为孕妇梅毒筛查的障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5f0/6660890/fa40274a2c3c/rpsp-41-e21_Figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5f0/6660890/87c1e7b14f44/rpsp-41-e21_Figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5f0/6660890/fa40274a2c3c/rpsp-41-e21_Figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5f0/6660890/87c1e7b14f44/rpsp-41-e21_Figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5f0/6660890/fa40274a2c3c/rpsp-41-e21_Figure2.jpg

相似文献

1
[Health-worker barriers to syphilis screening in pregnant women in Bolivia's Los Andes network].[玻利维亚洛斯安第斯地区网络中卫生工作者对孕妇梅毒筛查的障碍]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2017 May 25;41:e21. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2017.21.
2
Gaps in the congenital syphilis prevention cascade: qualitative findings from Kern County, California.先天性梅毒预防环节中的差距:加利福尼亚州克恩县的定性研究结果。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Feb 5;22(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07100-3.
3
The co-occurrence of intimate partner violence and syphilis among pregnant women in Bolivia.玻利维亚孕妇中亲密伴侣暴力和梅毒的同时发生。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 Dec;18(12):2077-86. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.1258.
4
Rollout of rapid point of care tests for antenatal syphilis screening in Ghana: healthcare provider perspectives and experiences.加纳开展产前梅毒筛查即时检测:医疗服务提供者的观点与经验
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 20;18(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2935-y.
5
Barriers to antenatal syphilis screening in Burkina Faso.布基纳法索产前梅毒筛查的障碍
Pan Afr Med J. 2014 Jan 18;17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):12. doi: 10.11694/pamj.supp.2014.17.1.3423. eCollection 2014.
6
Introducing onsite antenatal syphilis screening in Burkina Faso: implementation and evaluation of a feasibility intervention tailored to a local context.在布基纳法索引入现场产前梅毒筛查:针对当地情况开展的可行性干预措施的实施与评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 30;17(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2325-x.
7
[Introduction of rapid syphilis and HIV testing in prenatal care in Colombia: qualitative analysis].[哥伦比亚产前护理中梅毒和艾滋病毒快速检测的引入:定性分析]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2016 Dec;40(6):462-467.
8
[Assessment of the congenital syphilis prevention programs].[先天性梅毒预防项目评估]
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2011 Jul-Sep;115(3):934-7.
9
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of antenatal syphilis screening and treatment for the prevention of congenital syphilis in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia: results of qualitative formative research.刚果民主共和国和赞比亚实施产前梅毒筛查和治疗以预防先天性梅毒的障碍与促进因素:定性形成性研究结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 14;17(1):556. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2494-7.
10
Perceptions, attitude and uptake of rapid syphilis testing services in antenatal clinics in North-Western Tanzania.坦桑尼亚西北部产前诊所对梅毒快速检测服务的认知、态度及接受情况
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Jun;31(5):667-73. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv116. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Facilitators and barriers to point-of-care testing for sexually transmitted infections in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.中低收入国家即时检测性传播感染的促进因素和障碍:范围综述。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Jun 20;22(1):561. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07534-9.
2
Embedded implementation research determinants in Latin American health systems.拉美卫生系统中嵌入式实施研究决定因素。
Rev Saude Publica. 2021 Apr 23;55:16. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003027. eCollection 2021.
3
Embedding implementation research to enhance health policy and systems: a multi-country analysis from ten settings in Latin America and the Caribbean.

本文引用的文献

1
Embedding research in health policy and systems in the Americas.将研究融入美洲地区的卫生政策与体系。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2017 Oct 19;41:e68. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2017.68.
2
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2015 Dec;38(6):479-86.
3
Gestational syphilis and stillbirth in the Americas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.美洲地区的妊娠期梅毒与死产:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
嵌入实施研究以加强卫生政策和体系:拉丁美洲和加勒比十个国家的多国分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Oct 15;17(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0484-4.
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2015 Jun;37(6):422-9.
4
Antenatal syphilis screening using point-of-care testing in low- and middle-income countries in Asia and Latin America: a cost-effectiveness analysis.在亚洲和拉丁美洲的低收入和中等收入国家使用即时检验进行产前梅毒筛查:一项成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2015 May 26;10(5):e0127379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127379. eCollection 2015.
5
Assessment of the impact of rapid syphilis tests on syphilis screening and treatment of pregnant women in Zambia.赞比亚快速梅毒检测对孕妇梅毒筛查和治疗影响的评估。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Jun;130 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.04.015. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
6
Rapid Syphilis Tests as Catalysts for Health Systems Strengthening: A Case Study from Peru.快速梅毒检测作为加强卫生系统的催化剂:来自秘鲁的案例研究
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 26;8(6):e66905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066905. Print 2013.
7
Untreated maternal syphilis and adverse outcomes of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.未经治疗的母体梅毒与妊娠不良结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Mar 1;91(3):217-26. doi: 10.2471/BLT.12.107623. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
8
Global estimates of syphilis in pregnancy and associated adverse outcomes: analysis of multinational antenatal surveillance data.全球妊娠梅毒估计数及相关不良结局:多国产前监测数据分析。
PLoS Med. 2013;10(2):e1001396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001396. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
9
Improving the coverage of the PMTCT programme through a participatory quality improvement intervention in South Africa.通过参与式质量改进干预措施提高南非 PMTCT 项目的覆盖率。
BMC Public Health. 2009 Nov 5;9:406. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-406.
10
Missed opportunities for congenital syphilis and HIV perinatal transmission prevention.先天性梅毒和艾滋病毒围产期传播预防的错失机会。
Rev Saude Publica. 2008 Oct;42(5):851-8. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102008000500010.