Suppr超能文献

曲米帕明与马普替林:抗抑郁、抗焦虑及心脏毒性比较

Trimipramine and maprotiline: antidepressant, anxiolytic, and cardiotoxic comparison.

作者信息

Pecknold J C, Familamiri P, McClure D J, Elie R, Chang H

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 1985 May;46(5):166-71.

PMID:2859273
Abstract

A 5-week placebo washout comparison of trimipramine 150 mg/day and maprotiline 150 mg/day was carried out in 15 male and 24 female patients with unipolar major affective disorder. There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, sex, weight, height, or vital signs. Both groups showed significant improvement over time, with no difference between the groups on the Severity and Improvement factors of the Clinical Global Impression scale, on the total and factor subscales of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and on the Anxiety Status Inventory. The maprotiline group showed a greater increase in weight over the study period than did the trimipramine group. There was a significant lowering of systolic blood pressure in the trimipramine group only and a significant and linear increase in pulse rate by Week 3 in the maprotiline group. Analysis of ECG showed that the atrial rates were significantly increased in the maprotiline group (p less than .002) but not in the trimipramine group. Trimipramine had significantly fewer anticholinergic, neurologic, and cardiovascular adverse effects than maprotiline.

摘要

对15名男性和24名女性单相重度情感障碍患者进行了为期5周的安慰剂洗脱期比较,比较对象为每日150毫克的曲米帕明和每日150毫克的马普替林。两组在年龄、性别、体重、身高或生命体征方面无显著差异。两组均随时间显示出显著改善,在临床总体印象量表的严重程度和改善因子、汉密尔顿抑郁量表的总分及因子分量表以及焦虑状态量表上,两组之间无差异。在研究期间,马普替林组的体重增加幅度大于曲米帕明组。仅曲米帕明组的收缩压显著降低,而马普替林组在第3周时心率显著且呈线性增加。心电图分析显示,马普替林组的心房率显著增加(p小于0.002),而曲米帕明组未出现这种情况。曲米帕明的抗胆碱能、神经和心血管不良反应明显少于马普替林。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验