Gwirtsman H E, Ahles S, Halaris A, DeMet E, Hill M A
J Clin Psychiatry. 1983 Dec;44(12):449-53.
In a double-blind study, 49 geriatric patients suffering from primary major depression were treated with maprotiline or doxepin. Efficacy and safety were assessed by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Zung Self-Rating Depression and Anxiety scales, side effects profile, routine laboratory tests, and measurements of blood levels. Although marked improvement was obtained with both antidepressants, patients on maprotiline showed statistically greater improvement than those on doxepin. No significant differences were detected between the two drugs with respect to side effects. A significant positive correlation was obtained between dosage and blood levels of maprotiline and doxepin, but there was no correlation between blood levels and clinical response. Overall, results suggest that maprotiline may be superior to doxepin in the treatment of geriatric depression.
在一项双盲研究中,49名患有原发性重度抑郁症的老年患者接受了马普替林或多塞平治疗。通过汉密尔顿抑郁量表、zung自评抑郁和焦虑量表、副作用情况、常规实验室检查以及血药浓度测量来评估疗效和安全性。虽然两种抗抑郁药均取得了显著改善,但服用马普替林的患者在统计学上比服用多塞平的患者改善更明显。两种药物在副作用方面未检测到显著差异。马普替林和多塞平的剂量与血药浓度之间存在显著正相关,但血药浓度与临床反应之间无相关性。总体而言,结果表明马普替林在治疗老年抑郁症方面可能优于多塞平。