Meng Lu, Wolff Marilyn B, Mattick Kelly A, DeJoy David M, Wilson Mark G, Smith Matthew Lee
Workplace Health Group, Department of Health Promotion and Behavior, College of Public Health, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Department of Health Promotion and Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Texas A&M Health Science Center, College Station, TX, USA.
Saf Health Work. 2017 Jun;8(2):117-129. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2016.11.004. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
Chronic disease rates have become more prevalent in the modern American workforce, which has negative implications for workplace productivity and healthcare costs. Offering workplace health interventions is recognized as an effective strategy to reduce chronic disease progression, absenteeism, and healthcare costs as well as improve population health. This review documents intervention and evaluation strategies used for health promotion programs delivered in workplaces. Using predetermined search terms in five online databases, we identified 1,131 published items from 1995 to 2014. Of these items, 27 peer-reviewed articles met the inclusion criteria; reporting data from completed United States-based workplace interventions that recruited at-risk employees based on their disease or disease-related risk factors. A content rubric was developed and used to catalogue these 27 published field studies. Selected workplace interventions targeted obesity ( 13), cardiovascular diseases ( 8), and diabetes ( 6). Intervention strategies included instructional education/counseling ( 20), workplace environmental change ( 6), physical activity ( 10), use of technology ( 10), and incentives ( 13). Self-reported data ( 21), anthropometric measurements ( 17), and laboratory tests ( 14) were used most often in studies with outcome evaluation. This is the first literature review to focus on interventions for employees with elevated risk for chronic diseases. The review has the potential to inform future workplace health interventions by presenting strategies related to implementation and evaluation strategies in workplace settings. These strategies can help determine optimal worksite health programs based on the unique characteristics of work settings and the health risk factors of their employee populations.
慢性病发病率在现代美国劳动力中变得越来越普遍,这对工作场所的生产力和医疗成本产生了负面影响。提供工作场所健康干预措施被认为是一种有效的策略,可减少慢性病的进展、旷工率和医疗成本,并改善人群健康状况。本综述记录了在工作场所实施的健康促进项目所采用的干预和评估策略。通过在五个在线数据库中使用预先确定的搜索词,我们从1995年至2014年共识别出1131篇已发表的文章。其中,27篇经过同行评审的文章符合纳入标准;这些文章报告了在美国完成的工作场所干预措施的数据,这些干预措施根据员工的疾病或与疾病相关的风险因素招募了有风险的员工。我们制定了一个内容分类标准,并用于对这27篇已发表的实地研究进行分类。选定的工作场所干预措施针对肥胖症(13项)、心血管疾病(8项)和糖尿病(6项)。干预策略包括指导性教育/咨询(20项)、工作场所环境改变(6项)、体育活动(10项)、技术应用(10项)和激励措施(13项)。在进行结果评估的研究中,最常使用的是自我报告数据(21项)、人体测量(17项)和实验室测试(14项)。这是第一篇专注于针对慢性病风险较高员工的干预措施的文献综述。该综述有可能通过介绍与工作场所环境中的实施和评估策略相关的策略,为未来的工作场所健康干预提供参考。这些策略可以帮助根据工作场所的独特特征及其员工群体的健康风险因素,确定最佳的工作场所健康项目。