1 San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Turin, Italy.
2 Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Italy.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018 Oct;7(7):631-638. doi: 10.1177/2048872617706501. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
The prevalence and outcome of patients with cancer that experience acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have to be determined.
The BleeMACS project is a multicentre observational registry enrolling patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention worldwide in 15 hospitals. The primary endpoint was a composite event of death and re-infarction after one year of follow-up. Bleedings were the secondary endpoint. 15,401 patients were enrolled, 926 (6.4%) in the cancer group and 14,475 (93.6%) in the group of patients without cancer. Patients with cancer were older (70.8±10.3 vs. 62.8±12.1 years, P<0.001) with more severe comorbidities and presented more frequently with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction compared with patients without cancer. After one year, patients with cancer more often experienced the composite endpoint (15.2% vs. 5.3%, P<0.001) and bleedings (6.5% vs. 3%, P<0.001). At multiple regression analysis the presence of cancer was the strongest independent predictor for the primary endpoint (hazard ratio (HR) 2.1, 1.8-2.5, P<0.001) and bleedings (HR 1.5, 1.1-2.1, P=0.015). Despite patients with cancer generally being undertreated, beta-blockers (relative risk (RR) 0.6, 0.4-0.9, P=0.05), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (RR 0.5, 0.3-0.8, P=0.02), statins (RR 0.3, 0.2-0.5, P<0.001) and dual antiplatelet therapy (RR 0.5, 0.3-0.9, P=0.05) were shown to be protective factors, while proton pump inhibitors (RR 1, 0.6-1.5, P=0.9) were neutral.
Cancer has a non-negligible prevalence in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, with a major risk of cardiovascular events and bleedings. Moreover, these patients are often undertreated from clinical despite medical therapy seems to be protective. Registration:The BleeMACS project (NCT02466854).
需要确定经历急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的癌症患者的患病率和结局。
BleeMACS 项目是一项多中心观察性研究,在全球 15 家医院中招募了接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者。主要终点是一年随访后死亡和再梗死的复合事件。出血是次要终点。共纳入 15401 例患者,癌症组 926 例(6.4%),无癌症组 14475 例(93.6%)。癌症患者年龄较大(70.8±10.3 岁 vs. 62.8±12.1 岁,P<0.001),合并症更严重,与无癌症患者相比,更常表现为非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死。一年后,癌症患者更常发生复合终点事件(15.2% vs. 5.3%,P<0.001)和出血(6.5% vs. 3%,P<0.001)。多因素回归分析显示,癌症的存在是主要终点(风险比(HR)2.1,1.8-2.5,P<0.001)和出血(HR 1.5,1.1-2.1,P=0.015)的最强独立预测因素。尽管癌症患者的治疗通常不足,但β受体阻滞剂(相对风险(RR)0.6,0.4-0.9,P=0.05)、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(RR 0.5,0.3-0.8,P=0.02)、他汀类药物(RR 0.3,0.2-0.5,P<0.001)和双联抗血小板治疗(RR 0.5,0.3-0.9,P=0.05)被证明是保护因素,而质子泵抑制剂(RR 1,0.6-1.5,P=0.9)则为中性。
接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,癌症的患病率不容忽视,心血管事件和出血的风险较大。此外,尽管医学治疗似乎具有保护作用,但这些患者的治疗往往不足。注册:BleeMACS 项目(NCT02466854)。