Suppr超能文献

癌症、炎症及无标准风险因素对心肌梗死患者的影响

Impact of Cancer, Inflammation, and No Standard Risk Factors in Patients With Myocardial Infarction.

作者信息

Yaginuma Hiroaki, Saito Yuichi, Goto Hiroki, Asada Kazunari, Shiko Yuki, Sato Takanori, Hashimoto Osamu, Kitahara Hideki, Kobayashi Yoshio

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

Biostatistics Section, Clinical Research Center, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

出版信息

JACC Asia. 2024 May 28;4(7):507-516. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2024.03.008. eCollection 2024 Jul.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The lack of standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs), including hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and smoking, is reportedly associated with poor outcomes in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Among patients with no SMuRFs, cancer and chronic systemic inflammatory diseases (CSIDs) may be major etiologies of AMI.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with cancer, CSIDs, and no SMuRFs in AMI.

METHODS

This multicenter registry included 2,480 patients with AMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients were divided into 4 groups: active cancer, CSIDs, no SMuRFs, and those remaining. The coprimary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major bleeding events, during hospitalization and after discharge.

RESULTS

Of 2,480 patients, 104 (4.2%), 94 (3.8%), and 120 (4.8%) were grouped as cancer, CSIDs, and no SMuRFs, respectively. During the hospitalization, MACE rates were highest in the no SMuRFs group, followed by the cancer, CSIDs, and SMuRFs groups (22.5% vs 15.4% vs 12.8% vs 10.2%;  < 0.001), whereas bleeding risks were highest in the cancer group, followed by the no SMuRFs, CSIDs, and SMuRFs groups (15.4% vs 10.8% vs 7.5% vs 4.9%;  < 0.001). After discharge, the rates of MACE (33.3% vs 22.7% vs 11.3% vs 9.2%;  < 0.001) and bleeding events (8.6% vs 6.7% vs 3.8% vs 2.9%; 0.01) were higher in the cancer group than in the CSIDs, no SMuRFs, and SMuRFs groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with active cancer, CSIDs, and no SMuRFs differently had worse outcomes after AMI in ischemic and bleeding endpoints during hospitalization and/or after discharge, compared with those with SMuRFs.

摘要

背景

据报道,缺乏包括高血压、糖尿病、血脂异常和吸烟在内的标准可改变心血管危险因素(SMuRFs)与急性心肌梗死(AMI)的不良预后相关。在没有SMuRFs的患者中,癌症和慢性全身性炎症性疾病(CSIDs)可能是AMI的主要病因。

目的

本研究的目的是评估AMI患者中患有癌症、CSIDs且无SMuRFs患者的临床特征和预后。

方法

这项多中心注册研究纳入了2480例接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的AMI患者。患者被分为4组:活动性癌症组、CSIDs组、无SMuRFs组和其余患者组。共同主要终点是住院期间和出院后的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)和大出血事件。

结果

在2480例患者中,分别有104例(4.2%)、94例(3.8%)和120例(4.8%)被归为癌症组、CSIDs组和无SMuRFs组。住院期间,无SMuRFs组的MACE发生率最高,其次是癌症组、CSIDs组和有SMuRFs组(22.5%对15.4%对12.8%对10.2%;P<0.001),而出血风险在癌症组最高,其次是无SMuRFs组、CSIDs组和有SMuRFs组(15.4%对10.8%对7.5%对4.9%;P<0.001)。出院后,癌症组的MACE发生率(33.3%对22.7%对11.3%对9.2%;P<0.001)和出血事件发生率(8.6%对6.7%对3.8%对2.9%;P=0.01)高于CSIDs组、无SMuRFs组和有SMuRFs组。

结论

与有SMuRFs的患者相比,患有活动性癌症、CSIDs且无SMuRFs的患者在AMI后住院期间和/或出院后的缺血和出血终点方面预后更差。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验