Liu Jiali, Li Ling, Deng Ke, Xu Chang, Busse Jason W, Vandvik Per Olav, Li Sheyu, Guyatt Gordon H, Sun Xin
Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Centre and CREAT Group, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Centre, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.
BMJ. 2017 Jun 8;357:j2499. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j2499.
To assess the impact of incretin based treatment on all cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov. Randomised controlled trials that compared glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors with placebo or active anti-diabetic drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes. Paired reviewers independently screened citations, assessed risk of bias of included studies, and extracted data. Peto's method was used as the primary approach to pool effect estimates from trials, sensitivity analyses were carried out with other statistical approaches, and meta-regression was applied for six prespecified hypotheses to explore heterogeneity. The GRADE approach was used to rate the quality of evidence. 189 randomised controlled trials (n=155 145) were included, all of which were at low to moderate risk of bias; 77 reported no events of death and 112 reported 3888 deaths among 151 614 patients. Meta-analysis of 189 trials showed no difference in all cause mortality between incretin drugs versus control (1925/84 136 1963/67 478; odds ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.90 to 1.02, I=0%; risk difference 3 fewer events (95% confidence interval 7 fewer to 1 more) per 1000 patients over five years; moderate quality evidence). Results suggested the possibility of a mortality benefit with GLP-1 agonists but not DPP-4 inhibitors, but the subgroup hypothesis had low credibility. Sensitivity analyses showed no important differences in the estimates of effects. Current evidence does not support the suggestion that incretin based treatment increases all cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. Further studies are warranted to examine if the effect differs between GLP-1 agonists versus DPP-4 inhibitors.
评估基于肠促胰岛素的治疗对2型糖尿病患者全因死亡率的影响。随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。检索了Medline、Embase、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)以及ClinicalTrials.gov。纳入了将胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂或二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂与安慰剂或活性抗糖尿病药物进行比较的2型糖尿病患者随机对照试验。由两名评价员独立筛选文献、评估纳入研究的偏倚风险并提取数据。采用Peto方法作为汇总试验效应估计值的主要方法,用其他统计方法进行敏感性分析,并对六个预先设定的假设进行meta回归以探讨异质性。采用GRADE方法对证据质量进行评级。纳入了189项随机对照试验(n=155145),所有试验的偏倚风险均为低到中度;77项试验未报告死亡事件,112项试验在151614例患者中报告了3888例死亡。对189项试验的荟萃分析显示,肠促胰岛素药物与对照相比,全因死亡率无差异(1925/84136对1963/67478;比值比0.96,95%置信区间0.90至1.02,I²=0%;风险差为每1000例患者在五年内少3例事件(95%置信区间为少7例至多1例);中等质量证据)。结果提示GLP-1激动剂可能有益,但DPP-4抑制剂无此作用,不过亚组假设的可信度较低。敏感性分析显示效应估计值无重要差异。目前的证据不支持基于肠促胰岛素的治疗会增加2型糖尿病患者全因死亡率这一观点。有必要进一步研究GLP-1激动剂与DPP-4抑制剂的效果是否存在差异。