• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Commentary: The Social Dilemma of Autonomous Vehicles.评论：自动驾驶汽车的社会困境
Front Psychol. 2017 May 24;8:808. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00808. eCollection 2017.
2
Human Decisions in Moral Dilemmas are Largely Described by Utilitarianism: Virtual Car Driving Study Provides Guidelines for Autonomous Driving Vehicles.在道德困境中，人类的决策在很大程度上由功利主义描述：虚拟汽车驾驶研究为自动驾驶车辆提供了指导方针。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):399-418. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0020-x. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
3
Judging the morality of utilitarian actions: How poor utilitarian accessibility makes judges irrational.评判功利主义行为的道德性：功利主义可及性的匮乏如何使法官变得不理性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Dec;23(6):1961-1967. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1029-2.
4
Autonomous Vehicles Require Socio-Political Acceptance-An Empirical and Philosophical Perspective on the Problem of Moral Decision Making.自动驾驶汽车需要社会政治层面的接受——关于道德决策问题的实证与哲学视角
Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Feb 28;12:31. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00031. eCollection 2018.
5
The Immoral Machine.不道德的机器
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2020 Jan;29(1):71-79. doi: 10.1017/S096318011900080X.
6
Transfer effects between moral dilemmas: a causal model theory.道德困境间的传递效应：因果模型理论。
Cognition. 2014 Apr;131(1):28-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.004. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
7
The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles.自动驾驶汽车的社会困境。
Science. 2016 Jun 24;352(6293):1573-6. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2654.
8
Social behavior for autonomous vehicles.自主车辆的社会行为。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 10;116(50):24972-24978. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820676116. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
9
Polysubstance dependent patients display a more utilitarian profile in moral decision-making than alcohol-dependent patients, depressive patients and controls.与酒精依赖患者、抑郁患者和对照组相比，物质使用障碍患者在道德决策中表现出更实用的特征。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 Oct 1;132(3):434-40. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.03.005. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
10
Ethics under uncertainty: the morality and appropriateness of utilitarianism when outcomes are uncertain.不确定情况下的伦理学：结果不确定时功利主义的道德性与适当性
Am J Psychol. 2014 Fall;127(3):367-82.

引用本文的文献

1
A Study of Common Principles for Decision-Making in Moral Dilemmas for Autonomous Vehicles.自动驾驶汽车道德困境决策通用原则研究
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Sep 19;12(9):344. doi: 10.3390/bs12090344.
2
Morality, Risk-Taking and Psychopathic Tendencies: An Empirical Study.道德、冒险与精神病态倾向：一项实证研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 3;13:834734. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.834734. eCollection 2022.
3
Prevention and Harm Reduction Interventions for Adult Gambling at the Local Level: An Umbrella Review of Empirical Evidence.地方层面成人赌博的预防与危害减少干预措施：实证证据的综合评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 8;18(18):9484. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189484.
4
Are Impulsive Decisions Always Irrational? An Experimental Investigation of Impulsive Decisions in the Domains of Gains and Losses.冲动决策总是不合理的吗？收益和损失领域中冲动决策的实验研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 12;18(16):8518. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168518.
5
Moral Decision Making: From Bentham to Veil of Ignorance via Perspective Taking Accessibility.道德决策：从边沁到无知之幕——经由视角可及性
Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 May 1;11(5):66. doi: 10.3390/bs11050066.
6
Moral Judgements on the Actions of Self-Driving Cars and Human Drivers in Dilemma Situations From Different Perspectives.不同视角下对自动驾驶汽车和人类驾驶员在两难情境中行为的道德评判
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 1;10:2415. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02415. eCollection 2019.
7
Interindividual neural differences in moral decision-making are mediated by alpha power and delta/theta phase coherence.个体间道德决策的神经差异受 alpha 功率和德尔塔/θ 相位相干性的调节。
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 14;9(1):4432. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40743-y.
8
People making deontological judgments in the Trapdoor dilemma are perceived to be more prosocial in economic games than they actually are.在陷门困境中做出道义判断的人在经济游戏中被认为比实际更具有亲社会倾向。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0205066. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205066. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles.自动驾驶汽车的社会困境。
Science. 2016 Jun 24;352(6293):1573-6. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2654.
2
Judging the morality of utilitarian actions: How poor utilitarian accessibility makes judges irrational.评判功利主义行为的道德性：功利主义可及性的匮乏如何使法官变得不理性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Dec;23(6):1961-1967. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1029-2.
3
An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment.一项关于道德判断中情感参与的功能磁共振成像研究。
Science. 2001 Sep 14;293(5537):2105-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1062872.

Commentary: The Social Dilemma of Autonomous Vehicles.

作者信息

Martin Rose, Kusev Ivaylo, Cooke Alex J, Baranova Victoria, Van Schaik Paul, Kusev Petko

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Kingston University LondonLondon, UK.

Department of Management, Huddersfield Business School, University of HuddersfieldHuddersfield, UK.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 May 24;8:808. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00808. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00808
PMID:28596744
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5443156/
Abstract
摘要