Suppr超能文献

左乙拉西坦辅助治疗局灶性癫痫:一项评估灵活滴定和给药对安全性及癫痫发作结局影响的开放标签试验。

Adjunctive lacosamide for focal epilepsy: an open-label trial evaluating the impact of flexible titration and dosing on safety and seizure outcomes.

作者信息

Baulac Michel, Coulbaut Safia, Doty Pamela, McShea Cindy, De Backer Marc, Bartolomei Fabrice, Vlaicu Mihaela

机构信息

IHU-ICM and Department of Neurology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris.

UCB Pharma, Colombes, France.

出版信息

Epileptic Disord. 2017 Jun 1;19(2):186-194. doi: 10.1684/epd.2017.0907.

Abstract

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of lacosamide in a real-life setting with the use of a flexible dose titration schedule and individualised maintenance doses up to the maximum approved dose of 400 mg/day. Adults with a diagnosis of focal seizures, with or without secondary generalization, were enrolled in this open-label Phase IV trial (NCT01235403). Lacosamide was initiated at 100 mg/day (50 mg bid) and uptitrated over a 12-week period to 200, 300 or 400 mg/day, based on safety and seizure control. Although dose increases were to be in increments of 100 mg/day, intermediate doses were permitted at each escalation step for one week for patients known to be particularly sensitive to starting new AEDs. After receiving a stable, effective dose for three weeks, patients entered the 12-week maintenance period. Primary outcomes were incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and withdrawal due to TEAEs. Seizure outcomes, all secondary, were median focal seizure frequency, ≥50% reduction in focal seizure frequency, and seizure freedom. One hundred patients with a mean age of 44 years were enrolled and 74 completed the trial. The incidence of TEAEs was 64.0% (n=100), with the most frequently reported (≥5% of patients) being dizziness, headache, and asthenia. Fourteen patients withdrew due to TEAEs, most frequently due to dizziness (six patients; 6.0%), vomiting (two patients; 2%), and tremor (two patients; 2%). Among patients with baseline and maintenance phase seizure data (n=75), median reduction in focal seizure frequency from baseline was 69.7% and the ≥50% responder rate was 69.3%. Among 74 patients who completed the maintenance phase, 21 (28.4%) were seizure-free. Flexible lacosamide dosing in this open-label trial was associated with a favourable tolerability and safety profile; the nature of the TEAEs was consistent with that observed in previous pivotal trials. Treatment with lacosamide was also associated with effective seizure control.

摘要

为评估拉科酰胺在实际应用中的安全性和有效性,采用灵活的剂量滴定方案以及高达最大批准剂量400mg/天的个体化维持剂量。诊断为局灶性癫痫发作(伴或不伴继发全面性发作)的成人患者被纳入这项开放标签的IV期试验(NCT01235403)。拉科酰胺起始剂量为100mg/天(50mg bid),并在12周内根据安全性和癫痫发作控制情况滴定至200、300或400mg/天。尽管剂量增加应以100mg/天的增量进行,但对于已知对开始使用新抗癫痫药物特别敏感的患者,在每次剂量递增步骤中允许使用一周的中间剂量。在接受稳定、有效剂量三周后,患者进入12周的维持期。主要结局为治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)的发生率以及因TEAE导致的停药情况。癫痫发作结局均为次要结局,包括局灶性癫痫发作频率中位数、局灶性癫痫发作频率降低≥50%以及无癫痫发作。100名平均年龄为44岁的患者被纳入研究,74名患者完成了试验。TEAE的发生率为64.0%(n = 100),最常报告的(≥5%的患者)为头晕、头痛和乏力。14名患者因TEAE停药,最常见的原因是头晕(6名患者;6.0%)、呕吐(2名患者;2%)和震颤(2名患者;2%)。在有基线和维持期癫痫发作数据的患者(n = 75)中,局灶性癫痫发作频率较基线的中位数降低为69.7%,≥50%的缓解率为69.3%。在完成维持期的74名患者中,21名(28.4%)无癫痫发作。在这项开放标签试验中,拉科酰胺的灵活给药与良好的耐受性和安全性特征相关;TEAE的性质与先前关键试验中观察到的一致。拉科酰胺治疗也与有效的癫痫发作控制相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验