Baulac Michel, Coulbaut Safia, Doty Pamela, McShea Cindy, De Backer Marc, Bartolomei Fabrice, Vlaicu Mihaela
IHU-ICM and Department of Neurology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris.
UCB Pharma, Colombes, France.
Epileptic Disord. 2017 Jun 1;19(2):186-194. doi: 10.1684/epd.2017.0907.
To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of lacosamide in a real-life setting with the use of a flexible dose titration schedule and individualised maintenance doses up to the maximum approved dose of 400 mg/day. Adults with a diagnosis of focal seizures, with or without secondary generalization, were enrolled in this open-label Phase IV trial (NCT01235403). Lacosamide was initiated at 100 mg/day (50 mg bid) and uptitrated over a 12-week period to 200, 300 or 400 mg/day, based on safety and seizure control. Although dose increases were to be in increments of 100 mg/day, intermediate doses were permitted at each escalation step for one week for patients known to be particularly sensitive to starting new AEDs. After receiving a stable, effective dose for three weeks, patients entered the 12-week maintenance period. Primary outcomes were incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and withdrawal due to TEAEs. Seizure outcomes, all secondary, were median focal seizure frequency, ≥50% reduction in focal seizure frequency, and seizure freedom. One hundred patients with a mean age of 44 years were enrolled and 74 completed the trial. The incidence of TEAEs was 64.0% (n=100), with the most frequently reported (≥5% of patients) being dizziness, headache, and asthenia. Fourteen patients withdrew due to TEAEs, most frequently due to dizziness (six patients; 6.0%), vomiting (two patients; 2%), and tremor (two patients; 2%). Among patients with baseline and maintenance phase seizure data (n=75), median reduction in focal seizure frequency from baseline was 69.7% and the ≥50% responder rate was 69.3%. Among 74 patients who completed the maintenance phase, 21 (28.4%) were seizure-free. Flexible lacosamide dosing in this open-label trial was associated with a favourable tolerability and safety profile; the nature of the TEAEs was consistent with that observed in previous pivotal trials. Treatment with lacosamide was also associated with effective seizure control.
为评估拉科酰胺在实际应用中的安全性和有效性,采用灵活的剂量滴定方案以及高达最大批准剂量400mg/天的个体化维持剂量。诊断为局灶性癫痫发作(伴或不伴继发全面性发作)的成人患者被纳入这项开放标签的IV期试验(NCT01235403)。拉科酰胺起始剂量为100mg/天(50mg bid),并在12周内根据安全性和癫痫发作控制情况滴定至200、300或400mg/天。尽管剂量增加应以100mg/天的增量进行,但对于已知对开始使用新抗癫痫药物特别敏感的患者,在每次剂量递增步骤中允许使用一周的中间剂量。在接受稳定、有效剂量三周后,患者进入12周的维持期。主要结局为治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)的发生率以及因TEAE导致的停药情况。癫痫发作结局均为次要结局,包括局灶性癫痫发作频率中位数、局灶性癫痫发作频率降低≥50%以及无癫痫发作。100名平均年龄为44岁的患者被纳入研究,74名患者完成了试验。TEAE的发生率为64.0%(n = 100),最常报告的(≥5%的患者)为头晕、头痛和乏力。14名患者因TEAE停药,最常见的原因是头晕(6名患者;6.0%)、呕吐(2名患者;2%)和震颤(2名患者;2%)。在有基线和维持期癫痫发作数据的患者(n = 75)中,局灶性癫痫发作频率较基线的中位数降低为69.7%,≥50%的缓解率为69.3%。在完成维持期的74名患者中,21名(28.4%)无癫痫发作。在这项开放标签试验中,拉科酰胺的灵活给药与良好的耐受性和安全性特征相关;TEAE的性质与先前关键试验中观察到的一致。拉科酰胺治疗也与有效的癫痫发作控制相关。