Department of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Section of Periodontics, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Division of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
J Periodontol. 2017 Sep;88(9):846-853. doi: 10.1902/jop.2017.160528. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
This retrospective study aims to assess compliance to supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) among patients treated with dental implants with different periodontitis histories and the possible influence of their compliance on peri-implant marginal bone level.
Dental records of 106 patients treated with at least one dental implant were reviewed. A single operator who did not provide care to the patients recorded the following during the first year of implant function (first year of follow-up), during the first 5 years of follow-up, and during the entire follow-up duration: 1) number of recalls; 2) compliance, calculated from registered attendance; 3) periodontal disease history; 4) peri-implant radiographic bone level from most recent examination; and 5) clinical parameters including probing depth and bleeding on probing. Clinical and radiographic parameters were assessed at site level and analyzed for possible associations among them and with demographic parameters.
Collected data were based on 156 implants with an average of 6.5 ± 3.4 years (range: 1 to 13 years) in function. Patients with periodontitis history demonstrated greater compliance than patients without periodontitis history during the two longer follow-up times. Over time, the majority of patients demonstrated partial compliance (71% to 80% of patients). Peri-implant bone level averaged 0.9 ± 1.1 mm, without significant association with compliance level; however, positive periodontitis history and more years in function were significantly associated with greater peri-implant bone loss.
Patients with implants partially comply with scheduled SPT, regardless of periodontitis history. Patients who had received periodontal treatment demonstrated better compliance than those without prior periodontal therapy experiences.
本回顾性研究旨在评估不同牙周炎病史患者接受牙种植体治疗后对支持性牙周治疗(SPT)的依从性,以及其依从性对种植体边缘骨水平的可能影响。
回顾了 106 名至少接受过一颗牙种植体治疗的患者的牙科记录。一名未为患者提供治疗的操作人员在种植体功能的第一年(随访的第一年)、前 5 年的随访期间和整个随访期间记录了以下内容:1)就诊次数;2)根据注册出勤率计算的依从性;3)牙周病史;4)最近检查的种植体周围放射学骨水平;5)临床参数,包括探诊深度和探诊出血。在部位水平评估临床和放射学参数,并分析它们之间以及与人口统计学参数的可能关联。
收集的数据基于 156 颗种植体,平均功能时间为 6.5 ± 3.4 年(范围:1 至 13 年)。有牙周炎病史的患者在两个较长的随访时间内比无牙周炎病史的患者表现出更高的依从性。随着时间的推移,大多数患者表现出部分依从性(71%至 80%的患者)。种植体周围骨水平平均为 0.9 ± 1.1 毫米,与依从性水平无显著相关性;然而,阳性牙周炎病史和更长的功能时间与更大的种植体周围骨丢失显著相关。
无论是否有牙周炎病史,接受牙种植体治疗的患者对计划的 SPT 仅部分依从。接受过牙周治疗的患者比没有牙周治疗经验的患者表现出更好的依从性。