Husain Zain A, Sahgal Arjun, De Salles Antonio, Funaro Melissa, Glover Janis, Hayashi Motohiro, Hiraoka Masahiro, Levivier Marc, Ma Lijun, Martínez-Alvarez Roberto, Paddick J Ian, Régis Jean, Slotman Ben J, Ryu Samuel
Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Sep;27(3):295-302. doi: 10.3171/2017.1.SPINE16684. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
OBJECTIVE The aim of this systematic review was to provide an objective summary of the published literature pertaining to the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) specific to previously untreated spinal metastases. METHODS The authors performed a systematic review, using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, of the literature found in a search of Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to March 2015. The search strategy was limited to publications in the English language. RESULTS A total of 14 full-text articles were included in the analysis. All studies were retrospective except for 2 studies, which were prospective. A total of 1024 treated spinal lesions were analyzed. The median follow-up time ranged from 9 to 49 months. A range of dose-fractionation schemes was used, the most common of which were 16-24 Gy/1 fraction (fx), 24 Gy/2 fx, 24-27 Gy/3 fx, and 30-35 Gy/5 fx. In studies that reported crude results regarding in-field local tumor control, 346 (85%) of 407 lesions remained controlled. For studies that reported actuarial values, the weighted average revealed a 90% 1-year local control rate. Only 3 studies reported data on complete pain response, and the weighted average of these results yielded a complete pain response rate of 54%. The most common toxicity was new or progressing vertebral compression fracture, which was observed in 9.4% of cases; 2 cases (0.2%) of neurologic injury were reported. CONCLUSION There is a paucity of prospective data specific to SBRT in patients with spinal metastases not otherwise irradiated. This systematic review found that SBRT is associated with favorable rates of local control (approximately 90% at 1 year) and complete pain response (approximately 50%), and low rates of serious adverse events were found. Practice guidelines are summarized based on these data and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society consensus.
目的 本系统评价旨在对已发表的有关立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)用于既往未治疗的脊柱转移瘤的文献进行客观总结。方法 作者按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,对截至2015年3月在Medline、PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆检索到的文献进行了系统评价。检索策略仅限于英文出版物。结果 共有14篇全文文章纳入分析。除2篇前瞻性研究外,所有研究均为回顾性研究。共分析了1024个接受治疗的脊柱病灶。中位随访时间为9至49个月。使用了一系列剂量分割方案,最常见的是16 - 24 Gy/1次分割(fx)、24 Gy/2 fx、24 - 27 Gy/3 fx和30 - 35 Gy/5 fx。在报告野内局部肿瘤控制粗略结果的研究中,407个病灶中的346个(85%)仍得到控制。对于报告精算值的研究,加权平均值显示1年局部控制率为90%。只有3项研究报告了完全疼痛缓解的数据,这些结果的加权平均值得出完全疼痛缓解率为54%。最常见的毒性是新出现或进展性椎体压缩骨折,在9.4%的病例中观察到;报告了2例(0.2%)神经损伤。结论 对于未接受其他放疗的脊柱转移瘤患者,缺乏关于SBRT的前瞻性数据。本系统评价发现,SBRT与良好的局部控制率(1年时约90%)和完全疼痛缓解率(约50%)相关,且严重不良事件发生率较低。基于这些数据和国际立体定向放射外科学会的共识总结了实践指南。