IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017 Nov;25(11):2188-2195. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2017.2712418. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
Conventional deep brain stimulation of basal ganglia uses high-frequency regular electrical pulses to treat Parkinsonian motor symptoms but has a series of limitations. Relatively new and not yet clinically tested, optogenetic stimulation is an effective experimental stimulation technique to affect pathological network dynamics. We compared the effects of electrical and optogenetic stimulation of the basal gangliaon the pathologicalParkinsonian rhythmic neural activity. We studied the network response to electrical stimulation and excitatory and inhibitory optogenetic stimulations. Different stimulations exhibit different interactions with pathological activity in the network. We studied these interactions for different network and stimulation parameter values. Optogenetic stimulation was found to be more efficient than electrical stimulation in suppressing pathological rhythmicity. Our findings indicate that optogenetic control of neural synchrony may be more efficacious than electrical control because of the different ways of how stimulations interact with network dynamics.
传统的基底神经节深部脑刺激采用高频规则电脉冲来治疗帕金森病运动症状,但存在一系列局限性。相对较新且尚未临床测试的光遗传学刺激是一种有效的实验刺激技术,可影响病理性网络动力学。我们比较了基底神经节电刺激和光遗传学刺激对病理性帕金森节律性神经活动的影响。我们研究了网络对电刺激和兴奋性及抑制性光遗传学刺激的反应。不同的刺激与网络中病理性活动表现出不同的相互作用。我们针对不同的网络和刺激参数值研究了这些相互作用。研究发现,与电刺激相比,光遗传学刺激在抑制病理性节律性方面更有效。我们的研究结果表明,由于刺激与网络动力学相互作用的方式不同,光遗传学控制神经同步可能比电控制更有效。