Bolli G, De Feo P, Perriello G, De Cosmo S, Ventura M, Campbell P, Brunetti P, Gerich J E
J Clin Invest. 1985 May;75(5):1623-31. doi: 10.1172/JCI111869.
To assess the role of hepatic autoregulation in defense against hypoglycemia, we compared the effects of complete blockade of glucose counterregulation with those of blockade of only neurohumoral counterregulation during moderate (approximately 50 mg/dl) and severe (approximately 30 mg/dl) hypoglycemia induced by physiologic hyperinsulinemia during subcutaneous infusion of insulin in normal volunteers. Compared with observations in control experiments, neurohumoral counterregulatory blockade (somatostatin, propranolol, phentolamine, and metyrapone), during which identical moderate hypoglycemia was achieved using the glucose clamp technique, resulted in suppressed glucose production (0.62 +/- 0.08 vs. 1.56 +/- 0.07 mg/kg per min at 12 h, P less than 0.01) and augmented glucose utilization (2.17 +/- 0.18 vs. 1.57 +/- 0.07 mg/kg per min at 12 h, P less than 0.01). Complete blockade of counterregulation (neurohumoral blockade plus prevention of hypoglycemia) did not further enhance the suppressive effects of insulin on glucose production. However, when severe hypoglycemia was induced during neurohumoral counterregulatory blockade, glucose production was nearly two times greater (1.05 +/- 0.05 mg/kg per min at 9 h) than that observed during complete counterregulatory blockade (0.58 +/- 0.08 mg/kg per min at 9 h, P less than 0.01) and that observed during mere neurohumoral blockade with moderate hypoglycemia (0.59 +/- 0.06 mg/kg per min at 9 h, P less than 0.01). These results demonstrate that glucose counterregulation involves both neurohumoral and hepatic autoregulatory components: neurohumoral factors, which require only moderate hypoglycemia for their activation, augment glucose production and reduce glucose utilization; hepatic autoregulation requires severe hypoglycemia for its activation and may thus serve as an emergency system to protect the brain when other counterregulatory factors fail to prevent threatening hypoglycemia.
为评估肝脏自身调节在抵御低血糖中的作用,我们在正常志愿者皮下输注胰岛素诱导中度(约50mg/dl)和重度(约30mg/dl)低血糖期间,比较了完全阻断葡萄糖对抗调节的效果与仅阻断神经体液对抗调节的效果。与对照实验中的观察结果相比,使用葡萄糖钳夹技术达到相同中度低血糖的神经体液对抗调节阻断(生长抑素、普萘洛尔、酚妥拉明和甲吡酮)导致葡萄糖生成受到抑制(12小时时为0.62±0.08 vs. 1.56±0.07mg/kg每分钟,P<0.01),葡萄糖利用增加(12小时时为2.17±0.18 vs. 1.57±0.07mg/kg每分钟,P<0.01)。完全阻断对抗调节(神经体液阻断加预防低血糖)并未进一步增强胰岛素对葡萄糖生成的抑制作用。然而,当在神经体液对抗调节阻断期间诱导重度低血糖时,葡萄糖生成比完全对抗调节阻断期间(9小时时为约0.58±0.08mg/kg每分钟,P<0.01)以及仅在中度低血糖的神经体液阻断期间(9小时时为约0.59±0.06mg/kg每分钟,P<0.01)观察到的葡萄糖生成几乎高出两倍(9小时时为1.05±0.05mg/kg每分钟)。这些结果表明,葡萄糖对抗调节涉及神经体液和肝脏自身调节成分:神经体液因子只需中度低血糖即可激活,可增加葡萄糖生成并减少葡萄糖利用;肝脏自身调节需要重度低血糖来激活,因此可能作为一种应急系统,在其他对抗调节因子未能预防危及生命的低血糖时保护大脑。