Hartmann A A
J Hosp Infect. 1985 Mar;6 Suppl A:73-80. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(85)80049-9.
The efficacy and safety of povidone-iodine (PVP-I) and 60% v/v% n-propanol on the forehead of patient's were examined using a newly developed method. Significantly higher reduction factors (RFs) of the total resident flora were obtained using PVP-I immediately after and 3-6 h after application (1.4, 1.4, 1.4) than with isopropanol (0.6, 0.6, 0.8) using the detergent scrub method. No significant difference was found using the cyanoacrylate method. Propionibacter spp. showed similar results. With Staphylococcus epidermidis, RFs of 1.8 were obtained with both bath agents using the detergent scrub method, but using the cyanoacrylate method significantly higher RFs were obtained with isopropanol immediately and 3 h after application (1.3, 1.3) than with PVP-I (0.4, 0.5). This phenomenon seems to be due to the limit of complete elimination of the resident bacterial counts in vivo.
使用一种新开发的方法,对聚维酮碘(PVP-I)和60%(体积/体积)正丙醇在患者前额的有效性和安全性进行了检查。与使用异丙醇(0.6、0.6、0.8)的去污剂擦洗法相比,使用PVP-I在涂抹后立即以及涂抹后3 - 6小时获得的总常驻菌群的减少因子(RFs)显著更高(1.4、1.4、1.4)。使用氰基丙烯酸酯法未发现显著差异。丙酸杆菌属显示出类似的结果。对于表皮葡萄球菌,使用去污剂擦洗法时两种沐浴剂获得的RFs均为1.8,但使用氰基丙烯酸酯法时,异丙醇在涂抹后立即和3小时获得的RFs(1.3、1.3)显著高于PVP-I(0.4、0.5)。这种现象似乎是由于体内常驻细菌计数完全消除的限度所致。