Grieb Suzanne Dolwick, Pichon Latrice, Kwon Simona, Yeary Karen Kim, Tandon Darius
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2017;11(1):13-22. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2017.0002.
In 2007 the journal Progress in Community Health Partnerships was launched to advance the field of community-engaged research and the journal's editors engaged in a Delphi process to identify priorities for the journal and field. Ten years later, the increased adoption of community-engaged research continues to improve public health.
The purpose of this manuscrip t is to i dentify community-engaged research priorities for the next 10 years.
The study engaged leaders in community-engaged research using a two-round Delphi process, whereby leaders in the field were asked to identify and then rank order topics in community-engaged research that needed to be prioritized for the next decade.
In stage 1, 41 respondents generated 441 priorities across 8 categories (e.g., theory, epidemiology, intervention science) that were collapsed into 90 priority topics, ranging from 8 to 15 per category. In stage 2, 73 respondents ranked five prioritized items for each category. The prioritized items are provided, with the following themes present across all categories: 1) improvements to equity among partners, 2) partnership sustainability, and 3) increased efforts to translate community-engaged research into policy change.
We compare the findings from this Delphi process with the priorities identified in 2007 to reflect on how the field has progressed. It is our hope that community and academic stakeholders will be able to use these priorities as a guide to their community-engaged research in the coming years.
2007年,《社区健康伙伴关系进展》杂志创刊,旨在推动社区参与研究领域的发展,该杂志的编辑开展了德尔菲法流程,以确定该杂志及该领域的优先事项。十年后,社区参与研究的更多采用持续改善了公共卫生状况。
本手稿的目的是确定未来十年社区参与研究的优先事项。
该研究采用两轮德尔菲法流程让社区参与研究领域的领导者参与其中,即要求该领域的领导者确定并按优先顺序排列社区参与研究中未来十年需要优先考虑的主题。
在第一阶段,41名受访者提出了441项优先事项,涵盖8个类别(如理论、流行病学、干预科学),这些优先事项被归纳为90个优先主题,每个类别有8至15个主题。在第二阶段,73名受访者对每个类别中的五个优先事项进行了排序。现将优先事项列出,所有类别中均呈现以下主题:1)合作伙伴间公平性的改善;2)伙伴关系的可持续性;3)将社区参与研究转化为政策变革的更多努力。
我们将此次德尔菲法流程的结果与2007年确定的优先事项进行比较,以反思该领域的进展情况。我们希望社区和学术利益相关者能够在未来几年将这些优先事项作为其社区参与研究的指南。