• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量社区参与式研究的背景、过程和结果:一个映射综述。

Measuring Community-Engaged Research Contexts, Processes, and Outcomes: A Mapping Review.

机构信息

VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Health Services Research and Development Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy.

David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 2020 Jun;98(2):493-553. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12458. Epub 2020 May 19.

DOI:10.1111/1468-0009.12458
PMID:32428339
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7296434/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Policy Points Community-engaged research (CEnR) engenders meaningful academic-community partnerships to improve research quality and health outcomes. CEnR has increasingly been adopted by health care systems, funders, and communities looking for solutions to intractable problems. It has been difficult to systematically measure CEnR's impact, as most evaluations focus on project-specific outcomes. Similarly, partners have struggled with identifying appropriate measures to assess outcomes of interest. To make a case for CEnR's value, we must demonstrate the impacts of CEnR over time. We compiled recent measures and developed an interactive data visualization to facilitate more consistent measurement of CEnR's theoretical domains.

CONTEXT

Community-engaged research (CEnR) aims to engender meaningful academic-community partnerships to increase research quality and impact, improve individual and community health, and build capacity for uptake of evidence-based practices. Given the urgency to solve society's pressing public health problems and increasing competition for funding, it is important to demonstrate CEnR's value. Most evaluations focus on project-specific outcomes, making it difficult to demonstrate CEnR's broader impact. Moreover, it is challenging for partnerships to identify assessments of interest beyond process measures. We conducted a mapping review to help partnerships find and select measures to evaluate CEnR projects and to characterize areas where further development of measures is needed.

METHODS

We searched electronic bibliographic databases using relevant search terms from 2009 to 2018 and scanned CEnR projects to identify unpublished measures. Through review and reduction, we found 69 measures of CEnR's context, process, or outcomes that are potentially generalizable beyond a specific health condition or population. We abstracted data from descriptions of each measure to catalog purpose, aim (context, process, or outcome), and specific domains being measured.

FINDINGS

We identified 28 measures of the conditions under which CEnR is conducted and factors to support effective academic-community collaboration (context); 43 measures evaluating constructs such as group dynamics and trust (process); and 43 measures of impacts such as benefits and challenges of CEnR participation and system and capacity changes (outcomes).

CONCLUSIONS

We found substantial variation in how academic-community partnerships conceptualize and define even similar domains. Achieving more consistency in how partnerships evaluate key constructs could reduce measurement confusion apparent in the literature. A hybrid approach whereby partnerships discuss common metrics and develop locally important measures can address CEnR's multiple goals. Our accessible data visualization serves as a convenient resource to support partnerships' evaluation goals and may help to build the evidence base for CEnR through the use of common measures across studies.

摘要

未加标签

社区参与式研究(CEnR)通过建立有意义的学术-社区伙伴关系来提高研究质量和健康结果。CEnR 已经越来越多地被医疗保健系统、资助者和社区采用,以寻找解决棘手问题的方法。由于大多数评估都集中在项目特定的结果上,因此很难系统地衡量 CEnR 的影响。同样,合作伙伴也难以确定评估感兴趣结果的适当措施。为了证明 CEnR 的价值,我们必须随着时间的推移展示 CEnR 的影响。我们汇编了最近的措施,并开发了一个交互式数据可视化工具,以促进更一致地衡量 CEnR 的理论领域。

背景

社区参与式研究(CEnR)旨在建立有意义的学术-社区伙伴关系,以提高研究质量和影响力,改善个人和社区的健康,并为采用基于证据的实践建立能力。鉴于解决社会紧迫的公共卫生问题的紧迫性和对资金竞争的加剧,证明 CEnR 的价值非常重要。大多数评估都集中在项目特定的结果上,因此很难证明 CEnR 的更广泛影响。此外,合作伙伴很难确定除了过程措施之外的感兴趣的评估。我们进行了一次映射审查,以帮助合作伙伴找到和选择评估 CEnR 项目的措施,并描述需要进一步开发措施的领域。

方法

我们使用 2009 年至 2018 年的相关搜索词在电子书目数据库中进行了搜索,并对 CEnR 项目进行了扫描,以确定未发表的措施。通过审查和简化,我们找到了 69 种衡量 CEnR 背景、过程或结果的措施,这些措施可能具有超越特定健康状况或人群的普遍性。我们从每个措施的描述中提取数据,以编目其目的、目标(背景、过程或结果)和正在测量的特定领域。

发现

我们确定了 28 种衡量 CEnR 进行条件和支持有效学术-社区合作因素的措施(背景);43 种评估群体动态和信任等结构的措施(过程);以及 43 种衡量 CEnR 参与和系统及能力变化的影响的措施(结果)。

结论

我们发现,即使是相似的领域,学术-社区伙伴关系在概念化和定义方面也存在很大差异。通过在伙伴关系中评估关键结构的方式实现更大的一致性,可以减少文献中明显的衡量混淆。一种混合方法,即伙伴关系讨论共同指标并制定当地重要措施,可以解决 CEnR 的多个目标。我们易于访问的数据可视化工具可用作支持伙伴关系评估目标的便利资源,并通过在研究中使用共同措施来帮助建立 CEnR 的证据基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58d4/7296434/4edfadcc4c4a/MILQ-98-493-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58d4/7296434/2e290c315201/MILQ-98-493-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58d4/7296434/4edfadcc4c4a/MILQ-98-493-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58d4/7296434/2e290c315201/MILQ-98-493-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58d4/7296434/4edfadcc4c4a/MILQ-98-493-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring Community-Engaged Research Contexts, Processes, and Outcomes: A Mapping Review.测量社区参与式研究的背景、过程和结果:一个映射综述。
Milbank Q. 2020 Jun;98(2):493-553. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12458. Epub 2020 May 19.
2
A roadmap for preventing and responding to trauma: Practical guidance for advancing community-engaged research.预防和应对创伤的路线图:推进社区参与式研究的实用指南。
Psychol Trauma. 2022 Sep;14(6):948-955. doi: 10.1037/tra0001159. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
3
Data Collection and Management in Community Engaged Research: Lessons Learned From Two Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships.社区参与研究中的数据收集与管理:从两个基于社区的参与式研究伙伴关系中汲取的经验教训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Autumn;9(3):413-22. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0057.
4
Community-Engaged Research: Common Themes and Needs Identified by Investigators and Research Teams at an Emerging Academic Learning Health System.社区参与式研究:新兴学术学习健康系统中的研究人员和研究团队确定的常见主题和需求。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 8;18(8):3893. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083893.
5
Training Academic and Community Investigator Teams for Community-Engaged Research: Program Development, Implementation, Evaluation and Replication.培训学术和社区参与研究团队:项目开发、实施、评估和复制。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(2):229-242. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0019.
6
Developing relevant assessments of community-engaged research partnerships: A community-based participatory approach to evaluating clinical and health research study teams.制定社区参与研究伙伴关系的相关评估:一种基于社区参与的方法来评估临床和健康研究团队。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 May 11;7(1):e123. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.544. eCollection 2023.
7
Community-Engaged Research: Exploring a Tool for Action and Advocacy.社区参与式研究:探索行动和倡导的工具。
J Trauma Dissociation. 2020 Jul-Sep;21(4):452-467. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2020.1770150.
8
Trust in Community-Engaged Research Partnerships: A Methodological Overview of Designing a Multisite Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Initiative.对社区参与研究伙伴关系的信任:设计多中心临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)计划的方法概述
Eval Health Prof. 2020 Sep;43(3):180-192. doi: 10.1177/0163278718819719. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
9
Convergence Despite Divergence: Views of Academic and Community Stakeholders about the Ethics of Community-Engaged Research.尽管存在分歧,但仍有共识:学术和社区利益相关者对社区参与式研究的伦理观点。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Apr 18;29(2):309-316. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.2.309. eCollection 2019 Spring.
10
Partnerships, Processes, and Outcomes: A Health Equity-Focused Scoping Meta-Review of Community-Engaged Scholarship.伙伴关系、流程和结果:以健康公平为重点的社区参与式学术研究的范围元综述。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2020 Apr 2;41:177-199. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094220. Epub 2020 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Routes of Well-Being, Spiritual Harmony and Recovery in Mental Health: The Community as a Policy-Maker.心理健康中的幸福、精神和谐与康复途径:作为政策制定者的社区
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2025;14:8390. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8390. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
2
Mechanisms and Intermediate Outcomes of a Community Translation to Adapt a Whole Family-Inclusive Lifestyle Intervention: A Pilot Evaluation.一项社区转化以适配全家庭包容性生活方式干预的机制及中间结果:一项试点评估
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2025 Jul 15;12(3):124-133. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.2135. eCollection 2025 Summer.
3
A Proposal for Addressing Bioethical Concerns Along the 10-Step Framework for Community Engagement.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring the Impact of Patient-Engaged Research: How a Methods Workshop Identified Critical Outcomes of Research Engagement.衡量患者参与研究的影响:一个方法研讨会如何确定研究参与的关键成果。
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2017 Nov 6;4(4):237-246. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1458. eCollection 2017 Fall.
2
Enhancing Capacity of Community-Academic Partnerships to Achieve Health Equity: Results From the CBPR Partnership Academy.增强社区-学术伙伴关系的能力以实现健康公平:基于 CBPR 伙伴关系学院的研究结果。
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Jul;21(4):552-563. doi: 10.1177/1524839918818830. Epub 2018 Dec 29.
3
Defining and Measuring Community Engagement and Community-Engaged Research: Clinical and Translational Science Institutional Practices.
关于在社区参与的十步框架中解决生物伦理问题的提案。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70345. doi: 10.1111/hex.70345.
4
A short pragmatic tool for evaluating community engagement: Partnering for Health Improvement and Research Equity.一种用于评估社区参与度的简短实用工具:促进健康改善与研究公平的伙伴关系。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 11;13:1539864. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1539864. eCollection 2025.
5
Academic Hegemony and Monitoring of Shared Power in Community-Engaged Research Trials: The Mid-Atlantic Center for Cardiometabolic Health Equity, 2023-2024.社区参与研究试验中的学术霸权与共享权力监督:大西洋中部心脏代谢健康公平中心,2023 - 2024年
Am J Public Health. 2025 Jul;115(S2):S164-S173. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2025.308188.
6
Increasing community members' engagement in cancer research: the making research CLEAR program.提高社区成员对癌症研究的参与度:“让研究清晰明了”项目
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jun 19;11(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00741-z.
7
Inclusion of Community-Based Participatory Research in High-Impact Medical Journals.高影响力医学期刊中基于社区参与式研究的纳入情况。
Health Equity. 2025 May 27;9(1):290-295. doi: 10.1089/heq.2024.0151. eCollection 2025.
8
Community-Engaged Research in Early Home Visiting: A Scoping Review of Peer-Reviewed Literature.早期家访中的社区参与式研究:同行评审文献的范围综述
Prev Sci. 2025 May 29. doi: 10.1007/s11121-025-01812-z.
9
Evaluation of a Participatory Action Project to Address Opioid Misuse: Breaking Down Barriers Through Partnership Processes.一项应对阿片类药物滥用的参与式行动项目评估:通过伙伴关系流程消除障碍
Gateways. 2024;17(1). doi: 10.5130/ijcre.v17i1.9202. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
10
Methods for community-engaged data collection and analysis in implementation research.实施研究中社区参与式数据收集与分析方法
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Apr 7;6(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00722-z.
界定与衡量社区参与及社区参与研究:临床与转化科学机构实践
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2018;12(2):145-156. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2018.0034.
4
Using Garden Cafés to engage community stakeholders in health research.利用花园咖啡馆让社区利益相关者参与健康研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 10;13(8):e0200483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200483. eCollection 2018.
5
A conceptual framework for evaluating health equity promotion within community-based participatory research partnerships.一个用于评估基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系中健康公平促进情况的概念框架。
Eval Program Plann. 2018 Oct;70:25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
6
Overcoming Challenges to Evidence-Based Policy Development in a Large, Integrated Delivery System.在大型综合医疗服务体系中克服循证政策制定面临的挑战。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec;53(6):4789-4807. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12986. Epub 2018 Jun 3.
7
Searching for the Impact of Participation in Health and Health Research: Challenges and Methods.探索参与健康和健康研究的影响:挑战与方法。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 May 13;2018:9427452. doi: 10.1155/2018/9427452. eCollection 2018.
8
Impact of Participatory Health Research: A Test of the Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model.参与式健康研究的影响:对基于社区的参与式研究概念模型的检验。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Apr 24;2018:7281405. doi: 10.1155/2018/7281405. eCollection 2018.
9
Evaluation of Communities of Practice performance developing implementation research to enhance maternal health decision-making in Mexico and Nicaragua.评估实践社区在开展实施研究以改善墨西哥和尼加拉瓜孕产妇健康决策方面的表现。
Implement Sci. 2018 Mar 12;13(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0735-8.
10
Patient and public engagement in priority setting: A systematic rapid review of the literature.患者和公众参与优先事项设定:文献系统快速综述。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 2;13(3):e0193579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193579. eCollection 2018.