Eder Milton Mickey, Holzer Jessica, Calhoun Karen, Strong Larkin L
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2017;11(1):1-11. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2017.0001.
The organizers founded Progress in Community Health Partnerships with a commitment to improving our understanding of community-based participatory research (CBPR) and its use in community-academic/institutional health partnerships. Following Rogers's Diffusion of Innovations, they reasoned that expanded adoption would occur through academic and community partner recognition of CBPR's relative advantage over previous approaches; its compatibility with the values, past experience and needs of potential adopters; its ease of understanding and use; its capacity for experimentation and refinement; and its production of observable results. We now assess the journal's progress toward realizing the vision, as well as issues and problems the organizers identified. We map the journal's content over its first decade onto the initial vision by examining the record of submissions and publications across the eight types of articles and the journal's record of rejections and publications. In remembering that Rogers's study of innovations requires both technical and social change, we discuss the difference between understanding how to do something and actually putting an innovation into action that becomes standard practice at both individual and systemic levels. We observe that the large number of Original Research and Works-in-Progress/Lessons Learned manuscripts, submitted and published, reflect traditional expectations for faculty research productivity. We suggest that sustainability, which rated of lower importance within the initial vision, has gained in importance among community and academic partners; however, it will gain added attention only with changed university expectations of researchers. We further suggest that the study of partnerships involved in researching and improving public health should be expanded beyond the current focus on CBPR.
组织者创立了《社区健康伙伴关系进展》,致力于增进我们对基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)及其在社区 - 学术/机构健康伙伴关系中的应用的理解。遵循罗杰斯的《创新的扩散》,他们推断,扩大采用将通过学术和社区伙伴认识到CBPR相对于以往方法的相对优势;它与潜在采用者的价值观、过去经验和需求的兼容性;其易于理解和使用;其进行实验和完善的能力;以及其产生可观察结果的能力来实现。我们现在评估该期刊在实现这一愿景方面的进展,以及组织者所确定的问题。我们通过检查八种类型文章的投稿和发表记录以及该期刊的拒稿和发表记录,将该期刊头十年的内容映射到最初的愿景上。鉴于罗杰斯对创新的研究需要技术和社会变革,我们讨论了理解如何做某事与实际将一项创新付诸行动并使其在个人和系统层面都成为标准做法之间的差异。我们观察到,提交并发表的大量原创研究和正在进行的工作/经验教训手稿反映了对教师研究生产力的传统期望。我们认为,在最初的愿景中重要性较低的可持续性,在社区和学术伙伴中变得更加重要;然而,只有在大学对研究人员的期望发生变化时,它才会受到更多关注。我们进一步建议,对参与研究和改善公共卫生的伙伴关系的研究应超越目前对CBPR的关注范围进行扩展。