Suppr超能文献

评估垫料和高架平台对商品肉鸡接触性皮炎和羽毛清洁度以及鸡舍垫料状况的影响。

Evaluating the effects of bedding materials and elevated platforms on contact dermatitis and plumage cleanliness of commercial broilers and on litter condition in broiler houses.

作者信息

Kaukonen E, Norring M, Valros A

机构信息

a Research Centre for Animal Welfare, Department of Production Animal Medicine , University of Helsinki , Helsinki , Finland.

出版信息

Br Poult Sci. 2017 Oct;58(5):480-489. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2017.1340588. Epub 2017 Jul 20.

Abstract
  1. Experiment 1, comparing wood shavings and ground straw bedding with peat, was performed on 7 broiler farms over two consecutive batches during the winter season. Experiment 2, assessing the effect of elevated (30 cm) platforms, was conducted in three farms replicated with 6 consecutive batches. 2. Footpad lesions were inspected at slaughter following the Welfare Quality® (WQ) assessment and official programme. Hock lesions, plumage cleanliness and litter condition were assessed using the WQ assessment. Litter height, pH, moisture and ammonia were determined. 3. Footpad condition on wood shavings appeared to be worse compared with peat using both methods of assessment and was accompanied by inferior hock skin health. WQ assessment resulted in poorer footpad and hock skin condition on ground straw compared with peat. Farms differed in footpad and hock skin condition. Footpad and hock lesions were not affected by platform treatment. Peat appeared more friable than ground straw. The initial pH of wood shavings was higher and moisture was lower than in peat, but at the end of production period there were no differences. Ground straw exhibited higher initial and lower end pH, and was drier in the beginning than peat. Litter condition and quality were not affected by platform treatment. 4. This study provides new knowledge about the applicability of peat as broiler bedding and shows no negative effects of elevated platforms on litter condition or the occurrence of contact dermatitis in commercial environments. The results suggest a complicated relationship between litter condition, moisture and contact dermatitis. Furthermore, it is concluded that the farmer's ability to manage litter conditions is important, regardless of the chosen litter material. Peat bedding was beneficial for footpad and hock skin health compared with wood shavings and ground straw.
摘要
  1. 实验1在7个肉鸡养殖场进行,在冬季连续两批肉鸡饲养期间,比较了刨花、粉碎秸秆垫料与泥炭的效果。实验2评估了抬高(30厘米)平台的效果,在3个养殖场进行,连续6批重复实验。2. 在屠宰时按照福利质量(WQ)评估和官方程序检查脚垫损伤情况。使用WQ评估方法评估跗关节损伤、羽毛清洁度和垫料状况。测定垫料高度、pH值、湿度和氨气含量。3. 两种评估方法均显示,与泥炭相比,刨花上的脚垫状况似乎更差,同时跗关节皮肤健康状况也较差。WQ评估结果表明,与泥炭相比,粉碎秸秆上的脚垫和跗关节皮肤状况更差。不同养殖场的脚垫和跗关节皮肤状况存在差异。脚垫和跗关节损伤不受平台处理的影响。泥炭似乎比粉碎秸秆更易碎。刨花的初始pH值较高,湿度低于泥炭,但在生产期结束时没有差异。粉碎秸秆的初始pH值较高,末期较低,且开始时比泥炭更干燥。垫料状况和质量不受平台处理的影响。4. 本研究提供了关于泥炭作为肉鸡垫料适用性的新知识,并表明在商业环境中,抬高平台对垫料状况或接触性皮炎的发生没有负面影响。结果表明垫料状况、湿度和接触性皮炎之间存在复杂的关系。此外,得出的结论是,无论选择何种垫料材料,养殖户管理垫料状况的能力都很重要。与刨花和粉碎秸秆相比,泥炭垫料有利于脚垫和跗关节皮肤健康。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验