Fudenberg Geoffrey, Imakaev Maxim
Center for the 3D Structure and Physics of the Genome, and Institute for Medical Engineering and Science (IMES), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Nat Methods. 2017 Jul;14(7):673-678. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4329. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
Chromosome conformation capture (3C) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are two widely used technologies that provide distinct readouts of 3D chromosome organization. While both technologies can assay locus-specific organization, how to integrate views from 3C, or genome-wide Hi-C, and FISH is far from solved. Contact frequency, measured by Hi-C, and spatial distance, measured by FISH, are often assumed to quantify the same phenomena and used interchangeably. Here, however, we demonstrate that contact frequency is distinct from average spatial distance, both in polymer simulations and in experimental data. Performing a systematic analysis of the technologies, we show that this distinction can create a seemingly paradoxical relationship between 3C and FISH, both in minimal polymer models with dynamic looping interactions and in loop-extrusion simulations. Together, our results indicate that cross-validation of Hi-C and FISH should be carefully designed, and that jointly considering contact frequency and spatial distance is crucial for fully understanding chromosome organization.
染色体构象捕获(3C)和荧光原位杂交(FISH)是两种广泛使用的技术,它们提供了关于三维染色体组织的不同读数。虽然这两种技术都可以检测位点特异性组织,但如何整合来自3C或全基因组Hi-C以及FISH的观点远未解决。通过Hi-C测量的接触频率和通过FISH测量的空间距离通常被认为是对同一现象的量化并可互换使用。然而,在这里我们证明,无论是在聚合物模拟还是实验数据中,接触频率都与平均空间距离不同。通过对这些技术进行系统分析,我们表明这种差异会在具有动态环化相互作用的最小聚合物模型以及环挤压模拟中,在3C和FISH之间产生看似矛盾的关系。总之,我们的结果表明,Hi-C和FISH的交叉验证应仔细设计,并且共同考虑接触频率和空间距离对于全面理解染色体组织至关重要。